1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Strains of agrobacteria, rhizobia and other organisms were collected from various sources and tested for their ability to utilize 61 compounds as sole carbon sources, oxidative or fermentative glucose metabolism, hydrolysis of starch, casein and gelatin, anaerobic arginine metabolism and production of 3-ketolactose. The resulting data was used in a numerical analysis and the strains were grouped on the basis of overall similarity.

The resultant groupings confirmed the idea that the genera and be combined, and four species of fast-growing rhizobia were recognized: Group I, Group II, Group III, related to and the Biotype 2 strains of Keane, Kerr & New (1970); Group IV, Crown-gall organisms were associated with groups I and III. The four species were defined without reference to pathogenicity or nodulating ability and it appears at present that crown-gall organisms can only be distinguished by pathogenicity testing.

H36 probably belongs in the genus whereas 1948 and 180 do not.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-72-3-565
1972-10-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/72/3/mic-72-3-565.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-72-3-565&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baird-Parker A. C. 1963; A classification of Micrococci and Staphlococci based on physiological and biochemical tests.. Journal of General Microbiology 30:409–427
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology; (1957) 7th edn. , Edited by. Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Smith N. London:: Bailliere, Tyndall & Cox.;
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernaerts M. J., De Ley J. 1963; A biochemical test for crown gall bacteria.. Nature, London: 197:406–407
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Conn H. J. 1942; The validity of the genus Alcaligenes.. Journal of Bacteriology 44:353–360
    [Google Scholar]
  5. COWAN S. T., STEEL K. J. 1965 Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria,. pp. 139–146 Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DE LEY J. 1968; DNA base composition and hybridisation in the taxonomy of the phytopathogenic bacteria.. Annual Review of Plant Pathology 6:63–90
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Ley J., Bernaerts M., Rassel A., Guilmot J. 1966; Approach to an improved taxonomy of the genus Agrobacterium.. Journal of General Microbiology 43:7–17
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Graham P. H. 1963; Antigenic affinities of the root-nodule bacteria of legumes.. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 29:281–291
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GRAHAM P. H. 1964; Application of computer techniques to the taxonomy of root-nodule bacteria.. Journal of General Microbiology 35:511–517
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GRAHAM P. H. 1971; Serological studies with Agrobacterium radiobacter, A. tumefaciens and Rhizobium strains.. Archiv fur Mikrobiologie 78:70–75
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Heberlein G. T., De Ley J., Tijtgat R. 1967; Deoxyribonucleic acid homology and taxonomy of Agrobacterium, Rhizobium and Chromobacterium.. Journal of Bacteriology 94:116–124
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HUGH R., LEIFSON E. 1953; The taxonomic significance of fermentative versus oxidative metabolism of carbohydrates by various gram-negative bacteria.. Journal of Bacteriology 66:24–26
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KEANE P. J., KERR A., NEW P. B. 1970; Crown gall of stone fruit. II. Identification and nomenclature of Agrobacterium isolates.. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 23:585–595
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KERN H. (1965 a); Untersuchungen zur genetischen Transformation zwischen Agrobacterium tumefaciens und Rhizobium spec. I. Ubertragung der Fahigkeit zur Induktion pflanzlicher Tumoren auf Rhizobium spec.. Archiv fur Mikrobiologie 51:140–155
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kern H. (1965 b); Untersuchungen zur genetischen Transformation zwischen Agrobacterium tumefaciens und Rhizobium spec. II. Vergleichende morphologische, physiologische und biochemische Untersuchungen an den Partnern einer Transformation.. Archiv fiir Mikrobiologie 52:206–223
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KERN H. 1969; Interspezifische Transformationen zwischen Agrobacterium tumefaciens und Rhizobium leguminosarum.. Archiv fiir Mikrobiologie 66:63–68
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kerr A. 1969; Crown gall of stone fruit. I. Isolation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and related species.. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 22:111–116
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KERR A. 1971; Acquisition of virulence by non-pathogenic isolates of Agrobacterium radiobacter.. Physiological Plant Pathology 1:241–246
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KLEIN D. T., KLEIN R. M. 1953; Transmittance of tumor-inducing ability to avirulent crown-gall and related bacteria.. Journal of Bacteriology 66:220–228
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LEDERBERG J., LEDERBERG E. M. 1952; Replica plating and indirect selection of bacterial mutants.. Journal of Bacteriology 63:399–406
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LIPPINCOTT J. A., LIPPINCOTT B. B. 1965; Timing of events in crown-gall tumor development on Pinto bean leaves.. Developmental Biology 12:309–327
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LIPPINCOTT J. A., LIPPINCOTT B. B. 1969; Tumour-initiating ability and nutrition in the genus Agrobacterium.. Journal of General Microbiology 59:57–75
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MACGREGOR A. N., ALEXANDER M. 1971; Formation of tumor-like structures on legume roots by Rhizobium.. Journal of Bacteriology 105:728–732
    [Google Scholar]
  24. MOFFETT M. L., COLWELL R. R. 1968; Adansonian analysis of the Rhizobiaceae.. Journal of General Microbiology 51:245–266
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MOLLER V. 1955; Simplified tests for some amino acid decarboxylases and for the arginine dihydrolase system.. Acta pathologica et microbiologica scandinavica 36:158–172
    [Google Scholar]
  26. NUTMAN P. S. 1946; Variation within strains of clover nodule bacteria in the size of nodule produced and in the ‘effectivity’ of the symbiosis.. Journal of Bacteriology 51:411–432
    [Google Scholar]
  27. PREVOT A. R. 1961 Traite de systematique bacterienne.. Paris:: Dunod.;
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ROSLYCKY E. B., ALLEN O. N., MCCOY E. 1960; Certain properties of bacteriophages of Agrobacterium radiobacter.. Bacteriological Proceedings,p. 28
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ROSLYCKY E. B., ALLEN O. N., MCCOY F. 1962; Phages for Agrobacterium radiobacter with reference to host range.. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 8:71–78
    [Google Scholar]
  30. SANDS D. C., SCHROTH M. N., HILDEBRAND D. C. 1970; Taxonomy of phytopathogenic Pseudomonads.. Journal of Bacteriology 101:9–23
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith E. F., Townsend C. O. 1907 A plant tumour of bacterial origin.. Science, New York: 25671–673
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sneath P. H. A. (1957); Application of computers to taxonomy.. Journal of General Microbiology 17:201–226
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sneath P. H. A. (1962); The construction of taxonomic groups.. Symposia of the Society for General Microbiology 12:289–396
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SOKAL R. R., MICHENER C. D. 1958; A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships.. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38:1409–1438
    [Google Scholar]
  35. STANIER R. Y., PALLERONI N. J., DOUDOROFF M. 1966; The aerobic pseudomonads: a taxonomic study.. Journal of General Microbiology 43:159–271
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sundman V. 1964; A description of some lignanolytic soil bacteria and their ability to oxidize simple phenolic compounds.. Journal of General Microbiology 36:171–183
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vincent J. M., Humphrey B. 1970; Taxonomically significant group antigens in Rhizobium.. Journal of General Microbiology 63:379–382
    [Google Scholar]
  38. WHITE L. O. 1971; The taxonomy of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-72-3-565
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-72-3-565
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error