1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

A study is made of the effect of experimental errors of microbiological tests upon similarity values used in numerical taxonomy. For the coefficient approximations are given for the mean and standard error of similarity values when some test results are erroneous, if the true value of similarity (), the average probability in 1, 0 data of erroneous tests results (), and the number of tests () are known. Formulae are given for estimating from an analysis of variance, and for including or excluding chosen factors that affect test reproducibility.

Whenis over about 10% the error of similarity values becomes unacceptably large. Test error also increases the existing sampling error. It is generally better to employ many tests even if they are not as reproducible as desired, rather than to use only a few extremely reproducible tests.

Examples are given suggesting that within one laboratory can usually be kept below 5%, but the discrepancies between laboratories may often be much larger. It is advisable to replicate some of the strains in numerical taxonomic studies, so as to afford a check on test reproducibility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-72-2-377
1972-09-01
2021-08-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/72/2/mic-72-2-377.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-72-2-377&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CARMICHA J.W., SNEAT P.H.A. 1969; Taxometric maps.. Systematic Zoology 18:402–415
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DAVIS G.H.C., FOMIN L., WILSON E., NEWTON K.G. 1969; Numerical taxonomy oflisteria, streptcocci and possibly related bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 57:333–348
    [Google Scholar]
  3. FISHE D.R., ROHLF F.J. 1969; Robustness of numerical taxonomic methods and errors in homology.. Systematic Zoology 18:33–36
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GOODALL D.W. 1967; The distribution of the matching coefficient.. Biometrics 23:647–656
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GOTTLIEB D. 1961; An evaluation of criteria and procedures used in the description and characterization of the streptomycetes. A cooperative study. Applied Microbiology 99:55–65
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GREWA M.S. 1962; The rate of genetic divergence of sublines in the C57BL strain of mice.. Genetical Research 3:226–237
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GYLLENBE H.G. 1963; A general method for deriving determination schemes for random collections of microbial isolates.. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, series A IV (Biologica) No. 69:23 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. JOHNSON R. 1972; Aspects of the taxonomy of Bordetella and related organisms.. Ph.D. Thesis University of Leicester;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LAPAGE S.P., BASCOMB S. 1968; Use of selenite reduction in bacterial classification. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 31:568–580
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LAPAGE S.P., BASCOMB S., WILLCOX W.R., CURTIS M.A. 1970; Computer identification of bacteria. . In Automation, Mechanization and Data Handling in Microbiology pp. 1–22 Edited by Baillie A., Gilbert R.J. London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LISTON J., WEIBE W., COLWELL R.R. 1963; Quantitative approach to the study of bacterial species.. Journal of Bacteriology 85:1061–1070
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LOCKHART W.R. 1967; Factors affecting reproducibility of numerical classifications.. Journal of Bacteriology 94:826–831
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MORONEY M.J. 1956 Facts from Figures. , 3rd edn. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. OWEN D.B. 1962; Handbook of Statistical Tables. London: Pergamon;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SNEATH P.H.A. 1968; Vigour and pattern in taxonomy.. Journal of General Microbiology 54:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SNEATH P.H.A. 1971; Theoretical aspects of microbiological taxonomy.. In Recent Advances in Micro‐biology, X Znternational Congress for Microbiology pp. 581–586 Edited by Pérez-Miravete A., Peláez D. Mexico D.F.: Associacion Mexicana de Microbiologia;
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SNEATH P.H.A. 1972 Computer taxonomy.. In Methods in Microbiology vol 7A pp. 29–98, Edited by. Norris J.R., Ribbons D.W. London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SNEDECOR G.W. 1956 Statistical Methods applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology. 5th edn Ames, Iowa: State University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SOKAL R.R, ROHLF F.J. 1969 Biometry. the Principles andpractice of Statistics in Biological Research. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman;
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SOKAL R.R., SNEATH P.H.A. 1963 Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco Freeman W. H.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. TAYLOR G.R., GUTHRIE R.K., SHIRLING E.B. 1970; Serological characteristics of Streptomyces species using cell wall immunizing antigens.. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 16:107–115
    [Google Scholar]
  22. TAYLOR R.J. 1971; Intraindividual phenolic variation in the genus Tiarella (Saxifragaceae); its genetic regulation and application to systematics. Taxon 20:467–472
    [Google Scholar]
  23. TAYLOR R.J., CAMPBELL D. 1969; Biochemical systematics and phylogenetic interpretations in the genusAquilegia.. Evolution 23:153–162
    [Google Scholar]
  24. TREMAINE J.H., ARGYLE E. 1970; Cluster analysis of viral proteins. Phytopathology 66:654–659
    [Google Scholar]
  25. WASHINGTON J.A., YU P.K.W., MARTIN W.J. 1971; Evaluation of accuracy of multitest micromethod system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.. Applied Microbiology 22:267–269
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WAYNE L.G. 1967; Selection of characters for an Adansonian analysis of mycobacteriaI taxonomy.. Journal of Bacteriology 93:1382–1391
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WEIMARCK G. 1970; Spontaneous and induced variation in some chemical leaf constituents in Hierochloe(Gramineae).. Botaniska Notiser 123:231–268
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WILLIAMS W.T., LANCE G.N. 1969; Application of computer classification techniques to problems in land survey.. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 42:345–354
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-72-2-377
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-72-2-377
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error