1887

Abstract

SUMMARY:conidiophores are positively phototropic to unilateral stimulation with white light. The response is restricted to the apical 240 μ of the conidiophore. The curvatures start about 22 min. after the onset of stimulation and proceed at a rate of about 2.5° min.. During the response the rate of extension of the proximal wall (with respect to the direction of the incident illumination) decreases by about 5 % as compared to its previous rate of growth, whilst that of the distal wall increases by about 5 % thusthere is no net change in the rate of wall growth during phototropism. The sign of the phototropic response is reversed when conidiophores are unilaterally stimulated with ultraviolet radiation (280 mμ) or with white light whilst submerged in liquid paraffin. Conidiophores cultured on media containing 1-lyxo-flavin or diphenylamine show normal phototropic responses.

A tenfold increase or decrease in light intensity is followed after approximately 12 min. by a slight change (about 11 %) in the rate of conidiophore growth. However, changes in light intensity between 139 and 268 lux do not affect the growth rate. There is an acceleration in growth rate when conidiophores previously held in red light for some hours are re-illuminated with whitelight.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-54-3-427
1968-12-01
2021-07-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/54/3/mic-54-3-427.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-54-3-427&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. BANBURY G. H. 1959; Phototropism of lower plants.. Ency. Plant. Physiol. 17:530
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BRENNER D. M., CARROLL G. C. 1968; Fine-structural correlates of growth in hyphae of Asco- desmis sphaerospora.. J. Bact. 95:658
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CARLILE M. J. 1965; The photobiology of fungi.. A. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 16:175
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CASTLE E. S. 1961a; Phototropism, adaptation and light-growth responses of Phycomyces.. J. gen. Physiol. 45:39
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CASTLE E. S. 1961b; Phototropic inversion in Phycomyces.. Science N. Y. 133:1424
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CURRY G. M., GRUEN A. E. 1957; Negative phototropism of Phycomyces in the ultraviolet.. Nature, Lond. 179:1028
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DENNISON D. S. 1959; Gallic acid in Phycomyces sporangiophores.. Nature, Lond. 184:2036
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DELBRUCK N., REICHARDT W. 1956; I. System analysis for the light growth reactions of Phyco- myces.. In Cellular Mechanisms in Differentiation and Growth. pp. 344 Ed. by Rudnick D. New York: Princeton University Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GRESSEL J. B., HARTMANN K. M. 1968; Morphogenesis in Trichoderma: Action spectrum of photoinduced sporulation.. Planta (Berl.) 79:271
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HAUPT W. 1965; Perception of environmental stimuli orientating growth and movement in lower plants.. A. Rev. Plant Physiol. 16:267
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LYTHGOE J. N. 1961; Effect of light and temperature on growth and development of Thamnidium elegans.. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 44:199
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MANOCHA M. S., COLVIN J. R. 1968; Structure of the cell wall of Pythium debaryanum.. J. Bact. 95:1140
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MARCHANT R., PEAT A., BANBURY G. H. 1967; The ultrastructural basis of hyphal growth. New Phytol.. 66:623
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MCCLURE W. K., PARK D., ROBINSON P. M. 1968; Apical organization in the somatic hyphae of fungi.. J. gen. Microbiol. 50:177
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MORONEY M. J. 1956; Facts from Figures, 3rd edn.. London: William Clowes and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PAGE R. M. 1956; Studies on the development of asexual reproductive structures in Pilobolus.. Mycologia 48:206
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SHROPSHIRE W. 1963; Photoresponses of the fungus Phycomyces.. Physiol. Rev. 43:38
    [Google Scholar]
  18. TRINCI A. P. J., BANBURY G. H. 1967; A study of the growth of tall conidiophores of Aspergillus giganteus.. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 50:525
    [Google Scholar]
  19. TRINCI A. P. J., BANBURY G. H. 1969; Effect of light on growth and carotenogenesisof the tall conidiophores of Aspergillus giganteus.. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. (in the Press.)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TRINCI A. P. J., PEAT A., BANBURY G. H. 1968; Fine structure of phialide and conidiophore development. in Aspergillus giganteus Wehmer. Ann. Bot. 32:241
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WELTY R. E., CHRISTENSEN C. M. 1965; Negative phototropic growth of Aspergillus restrictus.. Mycologia 57:311
    [Google Scholar]
  22. WESTAPHAL W. H. 1947; Physuik.. Berlin and Heidelberg:: Springer.;p. 464
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-54-3-427
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-54-3-427
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error