1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Slide cultures consisting of small agar blocks were inoculated with the L-forms of two group A streptococci strains -8 and grown in broth. The size of the L-form elements was measured on photographs taken immediately after inoculation of the slide cultures. The diameter of the elements varied between 0·2 and 3·0 . The frequency distribution of the diameters has a bimodal form. This bimodality probably represents the size distribution of two classes of L-form elements which can arbitrarily be divided at the diameter of 0·7 .

The reproductive elements of the streptococcal L-forms were found, with a few exceptions, to have a minimal diameter of 0·7 (average diameter 1·4 and 1·2 , respectively; standard deviation 0·3 ).

Slide culture experiments with concentrated filtrates of 0·45 filters showed that the reproductive elements present in the filtrates ranged in size from 0·8 to 1·7 with an average diameter of 1·2 (standard deviation 0·2 ). The filterability of the streptococcal L-form might therefore be mainly due to the plasticity of the L-form elements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-52-3-413
1968-08-01
2022-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/52/3/mic-52-3-413.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-52-3-413&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. vanBoven C. P. A., Ensering H. E., Hijmans W. 1968; Size determination by the filtration method of the reproductive element of group A streptococcal L-forms. J. gen. Microbiol 52:403
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chairman W. N. 1963; Some experiments concerning the limitations and errors in size measurement of small objects by visual microscopy.. Jl R. microsc. Soc 82:81
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Coussons R. T., Cole R. M. 1968; The size and replicative capacities of small bodies of group A streptococcal L-forms.. The Present Status of Research on Group A Streptococcus Ed. by Caravano R. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation.;
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dienes L. 1967; Morphology and reproductive processes of the L-forms of bacteria. I. Streptococci and staphylococci.. J. Bact 93:693
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dienes L. 1968; Morphology and reproductive processes of bacteria with defective cell wall.. Microbial Protoplasts, Spheroplasts and L-forms Ed. by Guze L. B. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dienes L., Bullivant S. 1967; Comparison of the morphology of PPLO and L-forms of bacteria with light and electron microscopy.. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 143:719
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dienes L., Madoff S. 1966; Development and growth of L-forms of bacteria and PPLO on membrane filters.. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med 121:334
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dienes L., Madoff S. 1968; Comparison of the morphology of PPLO and L-forms of bacteria with light and electron microscopy.. The Present Status of Research on Group A Streptococcus Ed. by Caravano R. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation.;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fodor M., nyi L. 1964; Studies on L-forms of Staphylococcus aureus strains of different antibiotic and phage sensitivity.. Acta microbiol. hung 11:155
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Klieneberger-Nobel E. 1962Pleuropneumonia-like Organisms (PPLO) Mycoplasmataceae. London and New York: Academic Press.;
  11. Ross K. F. A. 1957; The size of living bacteria.. Q. Jl microsc. Sci 98:435
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ross K. F. A., Galavazi G. 1964; The size of bacteria, as measured by interference microscopy.. Jl R. microsc. Soc. 84:13
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Roux J. 1960; La multiplication des formes L.. Annls Inst. Pasteur, Paris 99:286
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ryter A., Landman O. E. 1964; Electron microscope study of the relationship between meso- some loss and the stable L-state (or protoplast state) in Bacillus subtilis.. J. Bact 88:457
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sensenbrenner M., Bader-Hirsch A. M., Terranova T., Mandel P. 1964; Recherches sur le bacille Proteus p 18 et les formes L qui en dérivent. I. Étude quantitative des acides ribo- et desoxyribonucléiques.. Bull. Soc. Chim. biol 46:483
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Taubeneck U. 1959; New Grid-replica for precise localization in slide cultures.. J. Bact 77:506
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Taubeneck U. 1962; Untersuchungen über die L-Form von Proteus mirabilis Hauser. II. Entwick- lung und Wesen der L-Form.. Z. allg. Mikrobiol 2:132
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Thorsson R. C., Weibull C. 1958a; Electron microscopy of a stable Proteus L-form.. Nature, Lond 181:1348
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Thorsson R. C., Weibull C. 1958b; Studies on the structure of bacterial L-forms, protoplasts and protoplast-like bodies.. J. Ultrastruct. Res 1:412
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Weibull C. 1963; Size of minimal reproductive units of bacterial L-forms.. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med 113:32
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Weibull C., Beckman H. 1961; Chemical and metabolic properties of various elements found in cultures of a stable L-form.. J. gen. Microbiol 24:379
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Weibull C., Lundin B-M. 1962; Growth of elements of various sizes found in cultures of a stable Proteus L-form.. J. gen. Microbiol 27:241
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Weibull C., Mohri T., Afzelius B. A. 1965; The morphology and fine structure of small particles present in cultures of a Proteus L-form.. J. Ultrastruct. Res 12:81
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-52-3-413
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-52-3-413
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error