1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: The growth rates of nine yeasts, conventionally classified as ‘osmophilic’ and six yeasts, conventionally classified as ‘non-osmophilic’ were measured at 30° in media adjusted to known water activities with polyethylene glycol. The organisms were less tolerant of low water activities () in the presence of polyethylene glycol than in the presence of sugars. There was no significant difference between average minimal water activities supporting growth of the two groups of yeasts in polyethylene glycol, although differences in sugar tolerance were conspicuous. There was good correlation, however, between quantitative water relations of the organisms in polyethylene glycol and qualitative observations of ability to grow at specified sugar concentrations. The osmophilic organisms grew about half as fast as the non-osmophilic organisms at their respective optimal water activities. The osmophils had relatively broad water activity optima; the non-osmophils had sharp optima. Neither group of yeasts had a general requirement for a water activity lower than that of the basal medium (0.997 ) in order to grow, although there were two osmophilic strains which would not grow in the basal medium at 30°. The adjective ‘osmophilic’ is considered to be inaccurate; until the physiology of these yeasts is better understood we propose that they be designated simply as ‘sugar tolerant’. The quantitative results have provided a basis for selecting sugar tolerant organisms for biochemical and physiological investigations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-52-2-205
1968-07-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/52/2/mic-52-2-205.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-52-2-205&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Brown A. D. 1964; Aspects of bacterial response to the ionic environment.. Bact. Rev 28:296
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ingram M. 1957; Micro-organisms resisting high concentrations of sugars or salts.. Symp. Soc. gen. Microbiol 7:90
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lodder J., vanrij N. J. W. 1952 The Yeasts. A Taxonomic Study Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.;
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Onishi H. 1960; Studies on osmophilic yeasts. IX. Isolation of a new obligate halophilic yeast and some consideration on halophilism.. Bull, agric. chem. Soc. Japan 24:226
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Onishi H. 1963; Osmophilic yeasts.. Advanc. Food Res 12:53
    [Google Scholar]
  6. von Richter A. A. 1912; Über einen osmophilen Organismus, den Hefepilz Zygosaccharomyces mellis acidi sp.n.. Mykol. Zentbl 1:67
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Robinson R. A., Stokes R. H. 1949; Water activities of saturated solutions at 25°C.. Ind. Engng Chem 41:2013
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Scarr M. P., Rose D. 1966; Study of osmophilic yeasts producing invertase.. J. gen. Microbiol 45:9
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Scott W. J. 1956; Water relations of food spoilage micro-organisms.. Advanc. Food Res 7:83
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-52-2-205
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-52-2-205
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error