1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: , strain ‘Hildenborough’, was able to use sulphite, thiosulphate, tetrathionate, metabisulphite or dithionite in place of sulphate for growth. Resting cell suspensions reduced these ions using the theoretical amounts of hydrogen and forming the theoretical amount of sulphide, except in the case of dithionite, which probably decomposed spontaneously to sulphate and sulphur before being reduced.

The organism was unable to grow with or to reduce dithionate, perdisulphate, ‘formaldehydesulphoxylate’, sulphamate, benzenesulphonate, methanesulphonate, -hydroxyethane-sulphonate, sodium ethylsulphate, dimethylsulphone or cystine. Elementary sulphur, if purified by re-distillation, was also not attacked. Five other strains of , four of them cultivated autotrophically, were also unable to grow with pure elementary sulphur.

Colloidal sulphur permitted slow growth, or slow hydrogen absorption when a resting cell suspension was used. This effect was not due to oxide impurities in the sulphur permitting growth, as an ultra-filtrate of colloidal sulphur had considerably less activity.

A study of the rates of H uptake suggested that sulphur, thiosulphate and tetrathionate were not intermediates in normal sulphate reduction, but that sulphite was.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-4-725
1951-12-01
2021-08-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/5/4/mic-5-4-725.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-4-725&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baars E. K. 1930 Over Sulphatreductie door Bacterien Dissertation, W. D. Meinema, N.V., Delft, Holland:
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beijerinck W. M. 1895; Über Spirillum desulfuricans als Ursache von Sulfat-reduktion. Zbl. Baku (2 Abt.) 1:149104
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butlin K. R., Adams M. E. 1947; Autotrophic growth of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature; Lond: 160154
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Butlin K. R., Adams M. E., Thomas M. 1949a; The morphology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. J. gen. Microbiol 3:iii
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Butlin K. R., Adams M. E., Thomas M. 1949b; The isolation and cultivation of sulphate-reducing bacteria. J. gen. Microbiol 3:46
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Delden A. van. 1903; Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Sulphatreduktion durch Bakterien. Zbl. Bakt 2 Abt 11:31–113
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Difco Manual 1948, 8th ed. Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan:
  8. Ephraim F. 1934 A Textbook of Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd ed. London: Gurney & Jackson;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Partington J. R. 1946 General and Inorganic Chemistry London: MacMillan;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Postgate J. R. 1949; Inhibition of sulphate-reduction by selenate. Nature; Lond: 164670
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Postgate J. R. 1951; On the nutrition of D. desulphuricans. J. gen. Microbiol 5:714
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Report 1950 Chemistry Research 1949 H.M. Stationery Office, London:
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Starkey R. L. 1938; A study of spore formation and other morphological characteristics of Vibrio desulphuricans. Arch. Mikrobiol 9:268
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stephenson M., Stickland L. 1931; The reduction of sulphate to sulphide by molecular hydrogen. Biochem. J 25:215
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Subba Rao M. S., Sreenivasaya M. 1947; Rate of reduction of sulphate by Vibrio desulphuricans, Konae. Curr. Sci 9:285
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ZoBell C. E., Rittenberg S. C. 1948; Sulphate-reducing bacteria in marine sediments. J. marine Res 7:602
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-4-725
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-4-725
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error