1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: The results of testing a bacteriophage to a strain of clover nodule bacteria using young (1 day) and old (5 days) bacterial cultures both fit to the hypothesis that phage multiplication can be initiated by single phage particles. As the same phage preparations gave more plaques on solid media and higher proportions of liquid cultures in which phage multiplication could be detected, with young than with old bacterial cultures, the fit to the hypothesis is not an evidence that every single phage particle will multiply. It may be so when young bacterial cultures are used, although there is no positive evidence for it. With older bacterial cultures definitely only a proportion of viable phage particles succeed in starting phage multiplication, the proportion decreasing with the increasing age of bacterial cultures used for testing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-2-346
1951-05-01
2021-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/5/2/mic-5-2-346.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-2-346&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andrewes C. H., Elford W. J. 1933; Observations on anti-phage sera. I. ‘The Percentage Law.’. Brit. J. exp. Path 14:367
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bronfenbrenner J. J., Korb C. 1925; Studies on the bacteriophage of d’Herelle. III. Some of the factors determining the number and size of plaques of bacterial lysis on agar. J. exp. Med 42:483
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryan W. R., Beard J. W. 1940; Host influence on the characterization of response to the papilloma protein and to vaccinia virus. J. infect. Dis 67:5
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burnet F. M., Freeman M. 1937; A comparative study of the inactivation of a bacteriophage by immune serum and bacterial polysaccharide. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci 15:49
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark H. 1927; On the titration of the bacteriophage and the particulate hypothesis. J. gen. Physiol 11:71
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis E. L., Delbrück M. 1939; The growth of bacteriophage. J. gen. Physiol 22:365
    [Google Scholar]
  7. d’Herelle F. 1917; Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste de bacilles dysentériques. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 165:373
    [Google Scholar]
  8. d’Herelle F. 1920; Sur le microbe bactériophage. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris 83:247
    [Google Scholar]
  9. d’Herelle F. 1926 The Bacteriophage and its Behaviour Smith G. H. Translated by London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kleczkowska J. 1945; The production of plaques by Rhizobium bacteriophage in poured plates and its value as a counting method. J. Bact 50:71
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kleczkowski A. 1950; Interpreting relationships between the concentrations of plant viruses and numbers of local lesions. J. gen. Microbiol 4:53
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-2-346
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-2-346
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error