1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Three phases of , A, B and C, are distinguishable by cellular and colonial morphology, and to some extent serologically. Phase A is the modal form of freshly-isolated strains; it has a uniform bacillary morphology, swarms intermittently on nutrient agar, and forms stable suspensions in 0·85% saline. Phase B strains, though possessing flagella, are usually non-motile, non-swarming, and highly pleomorphie; usually form unstable suspensions. Phase C strains are uniformly filamentous, motile, often swarm in a continuous film, and stability in saline varies with the strain.

The somatic surface of phase A strains is characterized by a dominant type-specific antigen, and traces of a non-specific and a possibly strain-specific antigen. In phase B strains the type-specific antigen is largely lost, and the other two antigens dominate the surface. The antigenic surface of phase C strains does not differ markedly from that of phase A.

The phase variations A → B and A → C are reversible. Phase B resembles a partially R form, in which the mouse-virulence is significantly less than that of the parent phase A strain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-1-197
1951-02-01
2021-10-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/5/1/mic-5-1-197.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-1-197&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arkwright J. A. 1921; Variation in bacteria in relation to agglutination both by salts and by specific serum. J. Path. Bad 24:36
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Belyavin G., Miles E. M., Miles A. A. 1951; The serology of fifty strains of Proteus vulgaris. J. gen. Microbiol 5:178
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Duncan J. T. 1935; Inactivation of the ‘H’ antigen, by dilute mineral acid. Brit.J. exp. Path 16:405
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Felix A. 1923; über Varianten der Proteus X Stamme. Z. ImmunForsch 35:57
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Felix A., Rhodes M. 1931; Serological varieties of Typhus Fever. J. Hyg., Carrib 31:225
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Klieneberger-Nobel E. 1947; Morphological appearances of various stages of B. proteus and B. coli. J. Hyg., Camb 45:410
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kvittingen J. 1949; Studies of the life-cycle of Proteus Hauser. Acta path, microbiol. scand 26:24
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Leslie P. H., Gardner A. D. 1931; The phases of Haemophilus pertussis. J. Hyg., Camb 31:423
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Maccolini R. 1940; über einen Neuen in einigen Bact. Proteusstammen beobach-teten Dissoziationstyp. Z. ImmunForsch 97:127
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Macconkey A. 1905; Lactose fermenting bacteria in faeces. J. Hyg., Camb 5:333
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Miles A. A. 1951; The mouse pathogenicity and toxicity of Proteus vulgaris. J. gen. Microbiol 5: (In the Press.)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Miles A. A., Misra S. S. 1938; The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J. Hyg., Camb 38:732
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Moltke O. 1927; Contributions to the Characterization and Systematic Classification of B. proteus vulgaris (Hauser). Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pandit S. R., Wilson G. S. 1932; The relation between specific and non-specific agglutination in the Brucella group. J. Hyg., Camb 32:45
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Perch B. 1948; On the serology of the Proteus group. Acta path, microbiol. scand 25:703
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rauss K. F. 1936; The systematic position of Morgan’s bacillus. J. Path. Bact 42:183
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rustigian R., Stuart C. A. 1945; Biochemical and serological relationships of organisms of genus Proteus. J. Bact 49:419
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stamp Lord. 1947; The preservation of bacteria by drying. J. gen. Microbiol 1:251
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stamp Lord, Stone D. M. 1944; An agglutinogen common to certain strains of lactose and non-lactose fermenting coliform bacilli. J. Hyg., Camb 43:266
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Taylor J. F. 1928; B. proteus infections. J. Path. Bact 31:897
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Varela G., Zozaya J., Imaz F. 1944; Structural and serological analysis of intestinal group of Proteus. Rev. d. Inst, salub. y enferm. trop 5:15
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Weil E. 1920; tlber Varianten des Stammes X19. Wien. klin. Wschr 33:61
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Weil E. 1923; Variationsuntersuchungen bei X19. Z. ImmunForsch 35:25
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Weil E., Felix A. 1916; Zur serologischen Diagnose des Fleckfieber. Wien, klin. Wschr 29:33
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Weil E., Felix A. 1917; Weitere Untersuchungen fiber das wesen Fleckfieber-agglutination. Wien. klin. Wschr 30:1509
    [Google Scholar]
  26. White P. B. 1927; On the relation of the alcohol soluble constituents of bacteria to their spontaneous agglutination. J. Path. Bact 30:113
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-1-197
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-5-1-197
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error