1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

The times taken by and species of the genus to establish in the rumens of young animals were found to differ from those of other rumen ciliate species. The antagonistic relationships between certain rumen ciliates were examined and concurrent experiments were made in small vessels termed vivars which were suspended within the rumen of a sheep. A Millipore membrane separated the rumen contents from the contents of the vivars. Within these vessels it was possible to reproduce population changes first observed and to determine with certainty that in a population change where became irreversibly dominant this had been caused by predation by Polyplastron. This organism will eliminate Epidinium, , Eremo-plastron and Ostracodinium from a population. The cause, factors affecting it and the ultimate effect on the population are discussed. It was not possible to cause a reversal of the population within a vivar suspended in sheep, but since the prey of Polyplastron still existed and since the reverse change was seen to occur in cattle, this problem still remains unsolved. There was also some evidence of antagonism between Epidinium and Ophryoscolex.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-49-2-175
1967-11-01
2021-10-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/49/2/mic-49-2-175.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-49-2-175&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abou Akkada A. R., Howard B. H. 1960; The biochemistry of rumen protozoa. 3. The carbohydrate metabolism of Entodinium. Biochem. J 76:445
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrewartha H. G. 1961 In Introduction to the Study of Animal Populations Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown T. J. 1964; The inter-relationship of two dominant ciliate species in an activated sludge plant. J. Protozool 11:38
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Coleman G. S. 1963; The growth and metabolism of rumen ciliate protozoa. Symp. Soc. gen. Microbiol 13:298
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawson J. A. 1919; An experimental study of an amicronucleate Oxytricha. 1. Study of the normal animal, with an account of cannibalism. J. exp. Zool 29:473
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dogiel V. A. 1947; The phylogeny of the stomach-infusorians of ruminants in the light of palaeonto-logical and parasitological data. Quart. J. micr. Sci 88:97
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Duckworth J., Woodham A. A. 1961; Leaf protein concentrates. 1. Effect of source of raw material and method of drying on protein value for chicks and rats. J. Sci. Fd Agric 12:7
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eadie J. M. 1962a; The development of rumen microbial populations in lambs and calves under various conditions of management. J. gen. Microbiol 29:563
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Eadie J. M. 1962b; Inter-relationships between certain rumen ciliate protozoa. J. gen. Microbiol 29:579
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eadie J. M., Oxford A. E. 1955; Factors involved in the production of a novel kind of derangement of storage mechanism in living holotrich ciliate protozoa from sheep rumen. J. gen. Microbiol 12:298
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Elton C. 1958 In The Ecology of Invasions London: Methuen and Co. Ltd;
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fina L. R., Keith C. L., Bartley E. E., Hartman P. A., Jacobson N. L. 1962; Modified in vivo artificial rumen (vivar) techniques. J. Anim. Sci 21:930
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gelei J. von. 1925; Über den Kannibalismus bei Stentoren. Arch. Protistenk 52:404
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Giese A. C. 1938; Cannibalism and gigantism in Blepharisma. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc 57:245
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Giese A. C., Alden R. H. 1938; Cannibalism and giant formation in Stylonychia. J. exp. Zool 78:117
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lubinsky G. 1957; Note on the phylogenetic significance of predatory habits in the Ophryoscolecidae (Ciliata: Oligotricha). Can. J. Zool 35:579
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Padmavathi P. B. 1961; Giant cannibals in Blepharisma undulans (Protozoa: Ciliata). Arch. Protistenk 105:341
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Proctor V. W. 1957; Studies of algal antibiosis using Hematococcus and Chlamydomonas. Limnol. Oceanogr 2:125
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rice T. R. 1954; Biotic influences affecting population growth of planktonic algae. Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 54:227
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tartar V. 1961 In The Biology of Stentor International Series of Monographs on Pure and Applied Biology, Division Zoology London: Pergamon Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ullyett G. C. 1950; Competition for food and allied phenomena in sheep blowfly populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 234:77
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-49-2-175
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-49-2-175
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error