1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: The pattern of change of concentration of different groups of microorganisms in the rumen was found to be characteristic of the group and little affected by the time of day, the nature of the diet, or the host animal. The dilution rate of rumen liquor and the rate of change of concentration of several groups of micro-organisms were measured at intervals following feeding; this allowed calculation of the apparent specific growth rate. The changes in concentration of the ophryoscolecid ciliate protozoa, the selenomonads and the oval organism described by Eadie could be explained as the resultant of the changes in dilution rate due to the act of eating and in growth rate in response to incoming nutrients. Rates of change in concentration greater than could be accounted for on the basis of growth and dilution alone were found with the peptostreptococci, the polymastigate flagellate protozoa and the holotrich ciliate protozoa. It is suggested that the peptostreptococci underwent lysis or engulfment by other organisms and that the polymastigates became sequestered, probably close to the rumen wall. The concentration changes of the holotrichs were more difficult to understand, but it would appear that little division took place for some 18 hr after feeding, followed by several divisions in quick succession. The oscillospirae showed two peaks in concentration; no explanation can be offered for this.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-45-2-213
1966-11-01
2021-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/45/2/mic-45-2-213.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-45-2-213&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abou Akkada A. B., Shazly K. 1964; Effect of absence of protozoa from the rumen on microbial activity and growth of lambs.. Appl. Microbiol 12:384
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey C. B. 1961; Saliva secretion and its relation to feeding in cattle. 3. The rate of secretion of mixed saliva in the cow during eating, with an estimate of the total daily secretion of mixed saliva.. Br. J. Nutr 15:443
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey C. B., Balch C. C. 1961; Saliva secretion and its relation to feeding in cattle. 2. The composition and rate of secretion of mixed saliva in the cow during rest.. Br. J. Nutr 15:383
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Braune R. 1913; Untersuchungen über die im Wiederkäuermagen vorkommenden Protozoen.. Arch. Protistenk 32:111
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Browning I., Varnedoe N. B., Swinford L. R. 1952; Time of nuclear, cytoplasmic and cortical division of the ciliated protozoan, Tetrahymena geleii.. J. cell. comp. Physiol 39:371
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryant M. P., Robinson I. M. 1961; An improved non-selective culture medium for ruminal bacteria and its use in determining diurnal variation in numbers of bacteria in the rumen.. J. Dairy Sci 44:1446
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell A. S. 1930; Fission in Isotricha prostoma.. Arch. Protistenk 72:141
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Clarke R. T. J. 1965; Diurnal variation in the numbers of rumen ciliate protozoa in cattle.. N.Z. Jl agric. Res 8:1
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crick F. H. C. 1948; Cited as personal communication by Hughes (1952).
  10. Dogiel V., Federowa T. 1925; A note on the reproduction of Isotricha (Dasytricha) ruminantium.. Russk. Arkh. Protist 4:75
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Downes A. M., McDonald I. W. 1964; The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as a soluble rumen marker.. Br. J. Nutr 18:153
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eadie J. M. 1962a; The development of rumen microbial populations in lambs and calves under various conditions of management.. J. gen. Microbiol 29:563
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eadie J. M. 1962b; Inter-relationships between certain rumen ciliate protozoa.. J. gen. Microbiol 29:579
    [Google Scholar]
  14. El-TabeyShehata A. M. 1958; The effect of different rations on the numbers of free ruminal bacteria in sheep.. Appl. Microbiol 6:422
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hughes A. F. 1952 The Mitotic Cycle London: Butterworth.;
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hungate R. E., Bryant M. P., Mah R. A. 1964; The rumen bacteria and protozoa.. A. Rev. Microbiol 18:131
    [Google Scholar]
  17. James T. W. 1960; Controlled division synchrony and growth in protozoan micro-organisms.. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 90:550
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson B. C., Hamilton T. S., Robinson W. B., Garey J. C. 1944; On the mechanism of non-protein nitrogen utilization by ruminants.. J. Anim. Sci 3:287
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lubinsky G. 1957; Studies in the evolution of the Ophryoscolecidae (Ciliata: Oligotricha). III. Phylogeny of the Ophryoscolecidae based on their comparative morphology.. Can. J. Zool 35:141
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meyer R. M., Bartley E. E., Morril J. L., Stewart W. E. 1964; Salivation in cattle. I. Feed and ruminal factors affecting salivation and its relation to bloat.. J. Dairy Sci 47:1339
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Moir R. J., Masson M. J. 1952; An illustrated scheme for the microscopic identification of the rumen micro-organisms of sheep.. J. Path. Bact 64:343
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Monod J. 1949; The growth of bacterial cultures.. A. Rev. Microbiol 3:371
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nottle M. C. 1956; Ruminal flora studies in the sheep. VI. Diurnal, daily and seasonal fluctuations in the concentration of ‘free’ rumen bacteria and in rumen pH.. Aust. J. biol. Sci 9:593
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Purser D. B. 1961; A diurnal cycle for holotrieh protozoa of the rumen.. Nature, Lond 190:831
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Purser D. B., Moir R. J. 1959; Ruminal flora studies in the sheep. IX. The effect of pH on the ciliate population of the rumen in vivo.. Aust. J. agric. Res 10:555
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith C. L., Dendy P. P. 1962; Relation between the mitotic index, duration of mitosis, generation time and fraction of dividing cells in a cell population.. Nature, Lond 193:555
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith J. H. C., Benitez A. 1955; Chlorophylls: analysis in plant materials.. Paech K., Tracey M. V. Modern Methods of Plant Analysis 4144 Berlin: Springer.;
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stacy B. D., Warner A. C. I. 1966; Balances of water and sodium in the rumen during feeding: osmotic stimulation of sodium absorption in the sheep.. Q. Jl Exp. Physiol 51:79
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sugden B., Oxford A. E. 1952; Some cultural studies with holotrich ciliate protozoa of the sheep’s rumen.. J. gen. Microbiol 7:145
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Warner A. C. I. 1962a; Enumeration of rumen micro-organisms.. J. gen. Microbiol 28:119
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Warner A. C. I. 1962b; Some factors influencing the rumen microbial population.. J. gen. Microbiol 28:129
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Warner A. C. I. 1964; Production of volatile fatty acids in the rumen: methods of measurement.. Nutr. Abstr. Rev 34:339
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Warner A. C. I. 1966a; Periodic changes in the concentrations of micro-organisms in the rumen of a sheep fed a limited ration every three hours.. J. gen. Microbiol 45:237
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Warner A. C. I. 1966b; Diurnal changes in the concentrations of micro-organisms in the rumens of sheep fed to appetite in pens or at pasture.. J. gen. Microbiol 45:243
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-45-2-213
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-45-2-213
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error