1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Species of the genus have a guanine + cytosine (GC) content in DNA within the range 30·7-36·4 moles %. All the Gram-positive cocci so far designated as micrococci and sarcinas which produce acid from glucose when grown under anaerobic or aerobic conditions and have a GC content in DNA within this range should be also classified as . On the other hand species of the genus have a GC content in DNA within the range 66·3-73·3%. All the Gram-positive cocci hitherto designated as sarcinas and staphylococci which do not produce acid from glucose under aerobic or anaerobic conditions or only aerobically and which have a GC content in DNA within this range, should be also classified as . The range of GC content as outlined is approximate; it will be made more accurate (perhaps a little broader) when more data are available on the DNA base composition of the species belonging to the family Micrococcaceae.

On the basis of their DNA base composition the strains belonging to the genus are divided into three groups: group 1 (70·8-73·3 moles % GC); group 2 (67·5-69·5 moles % GC); group 3 (66·3-67·0 moles % GC). Similarly the strains belonging to the genus have been divided into three groups: group 5 (36·4 moles % GC); group 6 (33·3-34·2 moles % GC); group 7 (30·7-32·7 moles % GC). Strains within each group are believed to be phylogenetically related. When subjected to Adansonian analysis, the strains of the individual groups were clustered into subgroups. Each subgroup comprised the strains with approximately the same DNA base composition and a high % similarity of physiological and biochemical characters. Strains clustered into subgroups are believed to be genetically closely related, some may be identical. The following subgroups are suggested: micrococcus subgroups 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b; staphylococcus subgroups 5a, 6a, 7a. Arabic numerals refer to the designation of the group.

The classification of micrococci presented in this paper is substantially the same as that of Baird-Parker (1965) . The authors are of the same opinion as Baird-Parker (1965) that should be reclassified with the Gram-negative genera.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-44-2-281
1966-08-01
2021-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/44/2/mic-44-2-281.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-44-2-281&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baird-Parker A. C. 1963; A classification of micrococci and staphylococci based on physiological and biochemical tests.. J. gen. Microbiol 30:409
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baird-Parker A. C. 1965; The classification of staphylococci and micrococci from world-wide sources.. J. gen. Microbiol 38:363
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans J. B. 1965; Current views and problems relating to the taxonomy of the Micrococcaceae.. Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl. Taxon 15:111
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hill L. R. 1959; The Adansonian classification of the staphylococci.. J. gen. Microbiol 20:277
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kocur M., Martinec T. 1962; Taxonomic study of the genus Micrococcus . Folia Přírod. fakulty UJEP3
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pohja M. S., Gyllenberg N. G. 1962; Numerical taxonomy of micrococci of fermented meat origin.. J. appl. Bact 25:341
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rosypal S., Boháček J., Rosypalová A. 1966; DNA base composition of Micrococcus varians . Publ. Fac. Sci. Univ. J. E. Purkyně. No. 471115
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rosypal S., Kocur M. 1963; The taxonomic significance of the oxidation of carbon compounds by different strains of Micrococcus luteus . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 29:313
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosypal S., Kocur M., k K. 1963; A study of violet-pigmented micrococci. Yellow-pigmented mutants of Staphylococcus flavocyaneus.. J. gen. Microbiol 32:189
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosypal S., Rosypalová A. 1966; A comment to the definition of the genera Micrococcus and Staphylococcus . Publ. Fac. Sci. Univ. J. E. Purkyně. No. 471105
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosypalová A., Boháček J., Rosypal S. 1966a; Deoxyribonucleic acid base composition of violet cocci.. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 32:105
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosypalová A., Boháček J., Rosypal S. 1966b; Deoxyribonucleic acid base composition of some micrococci and sarcinae.. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek32 (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosypalová, Rosypal S. 1966; Some physiological properties of violet-pigmented micrococci. Their oxidation pattern and ability to grow in minimal synthetic medium.. Publ. Fac. Sci. Univ. J. E. Purkyně. (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Silvestri L. G., Hill L. R. 1965; Agreement between deoxyribonucleic acid base composition and taxometric classification of Gram-positive cocci.. J. Bact 90:136
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sneath P. H. A. 1957; The application of computers to taxonomy.. J. gen. Microbiol 17:201
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Subcommittee om Taxonomy of Staphylococci and Micrococci (1965). Recommendations.. Int. Bull bact. Nomencl. Taxon 15:109
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sueoka N. 1961; Variation and heterogeneity of base composition of deoxyribonucleic acids: compilation of old and new data.. J. mol. Biol 3:31
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-44-2-281
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-44-2-281
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error