1887

Microbiology Society logo

Volume 40, Issue 1

Some Effects of Nystatin on the Growth of Four Aspergillus Species Free

Abstract

SUMMARY

At subinhibitory concentrations nystatin exerted its main effect on four species of Aspergillus in the lag phase of growth. Subsequent growth and sporulation appeared to be normal, indicating the lack of permanent damage to survivors. Starting with an inoculum of spores the increased lag period was caused by the inhibition of swelling and germination; starting with an inoculum of mycelium, by the temporary cessation of hyphal elongation. At low concentrations of nystatin the lag period increased in proportion to the increase in initial nystatin concentration. Under these conditions the length of the lag was limited by the natural breakdown of the antibiotic in the medium rather than by any metabolic activity or adaptive response of the fungi. However, the lag period increased sharply, as the inhibitory nystatin concentration for each species was approached, to values greater than can be explained solely by the increased concentration of antibiotic. This was not due to the time taken for growth by any especially resistant spores but to the greatly decreased viability and slow outgrowth of normal survivors. This loss in viability was due to factors other than K leakage. Plasmolysis of germinated spores and mycelium occurred in some Aspergillus species at high concentrations of nystatin. The action of nystatin was relatively slow; no significant loss of viability or lengthening of the lag phase was noted until after exposure to the antibiotic for at least one hour, even at very high concentrations. Since the fungicidal effect on and . was appreciably slower than on . and . , it is possible that differences in the rate of absorption of nystatin in part determine sensitivity to nystatin. Spore germination took place at higher nystatin concentrations than did hyphal growth. The lethal dose for spores, which was three to four times higher than the fungistatic value, was also higher than for the mycelium.

  • Received:
  • Published Online:
© Society for General Microbiology 1965
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-40-1-107
1965-07-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/40/1/mic-40-1-107.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-40-1-107&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bradley S. G., Jones L. A. 1960; Mechanisms of action of antibiotics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 89:122
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Cirillo V. P., Harsch M., Lampen J. O. 1964; Action of the polyene antibiotics Filipin, nystatin and N-acetylcandidin on the yeast cell membrane. J. gen. Microbiol 35:249
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenberg G. M., Weiss W., Flippin H. F. 1956; Microbial studies and preliminary clinical experiences with nystatin Antibiot. Ann 1955–56837
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Horsefall J. G. 1945; Fungicides and their action. Annales Cryptogamici et Phyto-pathologici 2 Verdoon F., Mass Waltham. U.S.A.: Chronica Botanica Co;
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Kinsky S. C. 1961; Alterations in the permeability of Neurospora crassa due to polyene antibiotics. J. Bact 82:889
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Kinsky S. C. 1962; Effect of polyene antibiotics on protoplasts of Neurospora crassa. J. Bact 83:351
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Kubitsa R. A., Derse P. H. 1959; A comparison of triacetin and nystatin with respect to their stability and effect on Candida albicans. Antibiot. & Chemother 9:546
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Lampen J. O., Arnow P. 1959; Significance of nystatin uptake for its antifungal action. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med 101:792
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Lampen J. O., Arnow P. 1961; Inhibition of algae by nystatin. J. Bact 82:247
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Lampen J. O., Arnow P. M., Safferman R. S. 1960; Mechanism of protection by sterols against polyene antibiotics. J. Bact 80:200
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lampen J. O., Arnow P. M., Borowska Z., Laskin A. I. 1962; Location and role of sterol at nystatin binding sites. J. Bact 84:1152
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Lampen J. O., Morgan E. R., Slocum A., Arnow P. 1959; Absorption of nystatin by microorganisms. J. Bact 78:282
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Littman M. L., Pisano M. A., Lancaster R. M. 1958; Induced resistance of Candida species to nystatin and amphotericin B. Antibiot. Ann 1957–58 981
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Manning L. K., Robertson B. M. 1959; A case of aspergillosis treated with nystatin. Br. med. J. i345
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Marini F., Arnow P. M., Lampen J. O. 1961; The effect of monovalent cations on the inhibition of yeast metabolism by nystatin. J. gen. Microbiol 24:51
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Stewart G. T. 1956; Laboratory and clinical studies with nystatin in post-antibiotic mycotic infections. Br. med. J. i658
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Stout H. A., Pagano J. F. 1956; Resistance studies with nystatin. Antibiot. Ann 1955–56 704
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Szybalski W. 1952; Microbial selection 1. Gradient plate technique for study of bacterial resistance. Science 116:46
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-40-1-107
Loading
Some Effects of Nystatin on the Growth of Four Aspergillus Species
Microbiology 40, 107 (1965); https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-40-1-107
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-40-1-107
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-40-1-107
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error