1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

A correlation was observed between the sensitivity of different microorganisms to griseofulvin and their ability to take up the antibiotic, especially into their nucleic acid and protein fractions. The insensitive yeasts and and the bacterium did not bind an appreciable amount of [4-methoxy-H] griseofulvin. The poorly sensitive filamentous fungi and accumulated a considerable quantity of antibiotic, mostly in the water-soluble pool. This was in contrast to the highly sensitive dermatophytes and in which the nucleic acid and protein fraction contained about half of the total bound griseofulvin (as relatively stable complexes). It is proposed that uptake of griseofulvin is essential for antibiotic action and that the degree of sensitivity shown by an organism is dependent upon the tendency of its macromolecules to complex with the accumulated griseofulvin. Griseofulvin was not degraded by the insensitive or the poorly sensitive organisms tested. Metabolic products of griseofulvin were detected, however, in culture fluids of the sensitive dermatophytes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-39-2-285
1965-05-01
2021-08-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/39/2/mic-39-2-285.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-39-2-285&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abbot M. T. J., Gkove J. F. 1959; Uptake and translation of organic compounds by fungi. II. Griseofulvin. Exp. Cell. Res 17:105
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anand N., Davis B. D., Armitage R. K. 1960; Uptake of streptomycin by Escherichia coli. Nature, Lond 185:23
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boothroyd B., Napier E. J., Somerfield G. A. 1961; The demethylation of griseo-fulvin by fungi. Biochem. J 80:34
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brian P. W. 1949; Studies on the biological activity of griseofulvin. Ann. Bot 13:59
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eagle H. 1954; The binding of penicillin in relation to its cytotoxic action. I. Correlation between the penicillin sensitivity and combining activity of intact bacteria and cell-free extracts. J. exp. Med 99:207
    [Google Scholar]
  6. El-Nakeeb M. A. 1963; Antibiotic action and cellular binding of griseofulvin. Ph.D. Thesis Rutgers University;
    [Google Scholar]
  7. El-Nakeeb M. A., Lampen J. O. 1964; Formation of complexes of griseofulvin and nucleic acids of fungi and its relation to griseofulvin sensitivity. Biochem. J 92:59
    [Google Scholar]
  8. El-Nakeeb M. A., Lampen J. O. 1965a; Uptake of griseofulvin-H3 by the sensitive dermatophyte, Microsporum gypseum. J. Bad 89:564
    [Google Scholar]
  9. El-Nakeeb M. A., Lampen J. O. 1965b; Distribution of griseofulvin-H3 taken up by Microsporum gypseum; complexes of the antibiotic with cell constituents. J. Bad. (in the press)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Nakeeb M. A., McLellan W. L. Jr., Lampen J. O. 1965; Antibiotic action of griseofulvin on dermatophytes. J. Bad 89:557
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hancock R. 1962; Uptake of 14C streptomycin by some microorganisms and its relation to their streptomycin sensitivity. J. gen. Microbiol 28:493
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Roth F. J., Sallman B., Blank H. 1959; In vitro studies on the antifungal antibiotic griseofulvin. J. invest. Derm 33:403
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rowley D., Cooper P. D., Roberts P. W., Lester Smith E. 1960; The site of action of penicillin. I. Uptake of penicillin on bacteria. Biochem. J 46:157
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Szybalski W., Mashima S. 1959; Uptake of streptomycin by sensitive, resistant, and dependent bacteria. Biochem. biophys. res. Commun. 1:249
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-39-2-285
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-39-2-285
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error