1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: When methionine was present in the growth medium of wild-type the incorporation of isotope from S-sulphate into both cysteine and methionine was greatly decreased. Under these conditions much of the cysteine formed must have arisen from methionine and it is concluded that the diminution of cysteine synthesis from sulphate is caused by the cysteine formed from the methionine and not directly by methionine itself.

Wild-type Coprinus accumulated large amounts of cystathionine when grown with methionine and this appeared to have arisen from the added methionine as isotope from S-sulphate was not incorporated into the accumulated compound. The cysteine formed from methionine may have been formed from this accumulated cystathionine.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-3-333
1964-09-01
2022-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/36/3/mic-36-3-333.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-3-333&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Davis B. D. 1955; Intermediates in amino acid biosynthesis. Advanc. Enzymol 16:247
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Delavier-Klutchko C. 1963; Synthesis and cleavage of cystathionine by microbial enzymes. Fed. Proc 22:234
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ellis R. J., Pasternak C. A. 1962; Repressors of sulphate activation in Escherichia coli . Biochem. J 84:97P
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer G. A. 1957; The cleavage and synthesis of cystathionine in wild type and mutant strains of Neurospora crassa . Biochim. biophys. Acta 25:50
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Horowitz N. H. 1947; Methionine synthesis in Neurospora. The isolation of cystathionine. J. biol. Chem 171:255
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lewis D. 1961; Genetical analysis of methionine suppressors in Coprinus. Genet. Res 2:141
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Matsuo Y., Greenberg D. M. 1958; A crystalline enzyme that cleaves homoserine and cystathionine. I. Isolation procedure and some physicochemical properties. J. biol. Chem 230:545
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pasternak C. A. 1961; The repression of sulphate activation in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis . Biochem. J 81:2P
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts R. B., Cowie D. B., Abelson P. H., Bolton E. T., Britten R. J. 1965 In Studies in Biosynthesis in Escherichia coli Publ. Carneg. Instn 607
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rowbury R. J. 1962 Factors influencing the control of methionine synthesis in micro-organisms D. Phil, thesis Oxford University:
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rowbury R. J., Woods D. D. 1961a; Further studies on the repression of methionine synthesis in Escherichia coli . J. gen. Microbiol 24:129
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rowbury R. J., Woods D. D. 1961b; Repression of cystathionase production in Escherichia coli . Biochem. J 79:36P
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Teas H. J., Horowitz N. H., Fling M. 1948; Homoserine as a precursor of threonine and methionine in Neurospora. J. biol. Chem 172:651
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wijesundera S., Woods D. D. 1960; Suppression of methionine synthesis in Escherichia coli by growth in the presence of this amino acid. J. gen. Microbiol 22:229
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-3-333
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-3-333
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error