1887

Abstract

Summary: Interferon was produced in chick embryo cell cultures or in chick embryos by five viruses and in mouse embryo cell cultures or mouse lungs by two viruses. The slopes of the log dose response lines for the five chick inter-ferons were compared by using vaccinia virus as the assay virus. Analysis of variance showed that they did not differ significantly. Partially purified interferon gave the same slope as the crude preparations. These findings allowed a comparison to be made of relative yields of interferon induced by different viruses in the same cell system. Viruses differed widely in their ability to induce interferon. Chikungunya virus induced about 70 times more interferon than did vaccinia or Newcastle disease virus and 2.6 times more interferon than Kumba virus. The slopes of the log dose response lines for two interferon preparations were compared by using Chikungunya virus as the assay virus. Analysis of variance showed that they were not significantly different. A comparison of the vaccinia and Chikungunya assays for interferon showed that the Chikungunya assay was approximately 2.9 times more sensitive when the amount of interferon depressing the plaque count by 50% (PDD 50 doses) were compared. An analysis of variance showed that the difference in slope between the two assays was small but approaching significance. Mouse interferon, induced by two viruses, yielded parallel dose response lines. However, the slope of the curves for mouse interferon was significantly different from that for chick interferon. Because of this difference in slope, interferon production by the same virus in the two cell types could not be validly compared.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-34-3-475
1964-03-01
2022-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/34/3/mic-34-3-475.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-34-3-475&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Gifford G. E. 1963a; Variation of interferon yield with multiplicity of infection. Nature, Lond 200:91
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gifford G. E. 1963b; Studies on the specificity of interferon. J. gen. Microbiol, (in the Press)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Isaacs A., Hitchcock G. 1960; Role of interferon in recovery from virus infections. Lancet ii:69
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lampson G. P., Tytell A. A., Nemes M. M., Hilleman M. R. 1963; Purification and characterization of chick embryo interferon. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y 112:468
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lindenmann J., Gifford G. E. 1963; Studies on vaccinia virus plaque formation and its inhibition by interferon. III. A simplified plaque inhibition assay of interferon. Virology 19:302
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L., Randall R. J. 1951; Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. biol. Chem 193:265
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Porterfield J. S. 1960; A simple plaque inhibition test for the study of arthropod- borne viruses. Bull. Wld Hlth Org 22:373
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ruiz-Gomez J., Isaacs A. 1963; Optimal temperature for growth and sensitivity to interferon among different viruses. Virology 19:1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-34-3-475
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-34-3-475
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error