1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Sixty-three wild strains of were investigated. All 55 strains comprising groups 1 and 1 were found to be cryptic with regard to sucrose fermentation; they possessed competent enzyme systems but did not normally ferment the sugar. No enzyme capable of cleaving this sugar was extracted from the 3 strains of group 2 and the 5 strains belonging to group 3. Partially purified enzyme preparations from two strains of is and two cryptic strains were investigated; all four were constitutive β-D-fructofuranosidases capable of splitting raffinose to melibiose and fructose. Sucrose uptake studies showed that strains of groups 1, 1 and 2 did not accumulate sucrose from 1% (w/v) solution; the strains of group 3 accumulated large amounts of sucrose. None of the strains was permeable to maltose. The permeability barrier for sucrose was overcome by increasing its concentration to 5% (w/v). Under these conditions groups l and 1 strains fermented sucrose in peptone water within 36 hr. Sodium deoxycholate also changed the permeability barrier of some of the cryptic strains, enabling them to ferment 1% (w/v) sucrose promptly. After 3–11 days in 1% (w/v) sucrose peptone water all 55 cryptic , as well as the strains of group 3 fermented sucrose.

This fermentation was not caused by wild-type organisms, but resulted from the selection of sucrose-positive mutants which arose from the former and were capable of prompt sucrose fermentation. The mutants of strains of group 3 arose at lower rates than those from the cryptic strains. It is concluded that selective permeability to sucrose and β-D-fructofuranosidase activity are genetically distinct properties of Proteus. A scheme for the classification of phenotypes of is presented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-29-3-455
1962-11-01
2024-11-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/29/3/mic-29-3-455.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-29-3-455&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bacon J. S. D. 1955; Methods for measuring transglycosylase activity of invertases. Methods in Enzymology 1 258 Ed. by Colowick S. P., Kaplan N. O. New York: Academic Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldwin E. 1947 Dynamic Aspects of Biochemistry Cambridge University Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berenblum I., Chain E. 1938; An improved method for the colorimetric determination of phosphate. Biochem. J. 32 295
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chilton M. L., Fulton McD. 1946; A presumptive medium for differentiating paracolon from Salmonella cultures. J. Lab. din. Med. 31 824
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coetzee J. N., Hawtrey A. O. 1962; A change in phenotype associated with the bacteriophage carrier state in a strain of Proteus mirabilis. Nature, Lond. 194 1196
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coetzee J. N., Sacks T. G. 1960a; The late sucrose fermenting property of Proteus mirabilis. S. Afr. J. Lab. clin. Med. 6 49
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coetzee J. N., Sacks T. G. 1960b; Morphological variants of Proteus hauseri. J. gen. Microbiol. 23 209
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen G. N., Monod J. 1957 Bacterial permeases. Bact. Rev. 21 169
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Colvin J. R., Martin S. M., Dearing G. G. 1961; Extracellular glucose. 1. Phosphate in Acetobader xylinum and its role in cellulose synthesis. Canad. J. Biochem. 39 493
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gornall A. G., Bardwill C. J., David M. M. 1949; Determination of serum proteins by means of the Biuret reaction. J. biol. Chem. 177 751
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Haslewood G. A., Strookman T. A. 1939; A method for the estimation of ‘true’ sugar in 0-05 ml. of blood. Biochem. J. 33 920
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hassid W. Z. 1951; Metabolism of Polysaccharides and Disacharides. Phosphorus Metabolism p. 11 Ed. by McElroy W. D., Glass B. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hough L., Jones J. K. N., Wadman W. H. 1950; Quantitative analysis of mixtures of sugars by the method of partition chromatography. Part Y. Improved methods for the separation and detection of the sugars and their methylated derivatives on the paper chromatogram. J. chem. Soc. ii 1702
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kauffmann F. 1951 Enterobaderiaceae. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kriebel R. M. 1934; A comparative bacteriological study of a group of non-lactose-fermenting bacteria isolated from stools of healthy foodhandlers. J. Bad. 27 357
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Krikler M. S. 1953; The Serology of Proteus vulgaris. Ph.D. Thesis University of London;
  17. Li K., Barksdale L., Garmise L. 1961; Phenotypic alterations associated with the bacteriophage carrier state of Shigella dysenteriae. J. gen. Microbiol. 24 355
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lineweaver H., Burk D. 1934; The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 56 658
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lowe G. H., Evans J. H. 1957; A simple medium for the rapid detection of salmonellalike paracolon organisms. J. clin. Path. 10 318
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lowe G. H. 1960; A study of the factors controlling lactose-fermentation in the coliform and paracolon groups. J. gen. Microbiol. 23 127
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mackie & McCartney’s Handbook of Bacteriology 1960 Ed. by Cruickshank R. , 10th ed.. Edinburgh: E. and S. Livingstone Ltd.;
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Neuberg C., Mandl I. 1951; Invertase. The Enzymes 1 1 527 Ed. Summer J. B. New York: Academic Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pethica B. A. 1958; Lysis by physical and chemical methods. J. gen. Microbiol. 18 473
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rustigan R., Stuart C. A. 1945; The biochemical and serological relationships of the organisms of the genus Proteus. J. Bad. 49 419
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Salton M. R. J. 1957; The action of lytic agents on the surface structures of the bacterial cell. 2nd int. Conf. Surface Activity (London) 4 245 London: Butterworths.;
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-29-3-455
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-29-3-455
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error