1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Expanded descriptions of (Eppinger) Blanchard, based on 142 strains, and of (Lindenberg) Castellani & Chalmers, based on 62 strains, are presented and compared. Illustrations are given of the variation in morphology and appearance of the growth among strains of both species. The morphological and physiological similarity of ATCC strain no. 3318, the accepted type strain of Trevisan, to strains of is shown, and the resulting problem of nomenclature is discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-27-1-1
1962-01-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/27/1/mic-27-1-1.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-27-1-1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baldacci E. 1937; La conception d’espèce chez les actinomycètes par rapport á leui classification et á leur determination. Boll. Sez. ital. Soc. int. Microbiol 9:138
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradley S. G., Anderson D. L. 1958; Taxonomic implication of actinophage host-range. Science 128:413
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cummins C. S., Harris H. 1958; Studies on the cell-wall composition and taxonomy of Actinomycetales and related groups. J. gen. Microbiol 18:173
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Erikson D. 1935; The pathogenic aerobic organisms of the Actinomyces group. Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond. no 203:5
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon R. E., Mihm J. M. 1957; A comparative study of some strains received as nocardiae. J. Bact 73:15
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gordon R. E., Mihm J. M. 1958; Sporulation by two strains of Nocardia asteroides. J. Bact 75:239
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gordon R. E., Mihm J. M. 1959; A comparison of Nocardia asteroides and Nocardia brasiliensis. J. gen. Microbiol 20:129
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gordon R. E., Smith M. M. 1955; Proposed group of characters for the separation of StrepUmyces and Nocardia. J. Bad 69:147
    [Google Scholar]
  9. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Viruses 1958 p 9 Ed The Editorial Board of the International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature Ames: Iowa State College Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jensen H. L. 1931; Contributions to our knowledge of the Actinomycetales. II. The definition and subdivision of the genus Actinomyces, with a preliminary account of Australian soil actinomycetes. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W 56:345
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nocard M. E. 1888; Note sur la maladie des boeufs de la Guadeloupe connue sous le nom de farcin. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 2:293
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Puntoni C. 1931; Plurality specifica dell’ Actinomyces boois. Ann. Igiene 41:1
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Trevisan V. 1889 I Generiele Specie delle Batteriacee p. 9 Milano: Zanaboni e Gabuzzi;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Waksman S. A. 1957; Actinomycetaceae Buchanan. In Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th ed.. p. 718 Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Waksman S. A., Curtis R. E. 1916; The Actinomyces of the soil. Soil Sci 1:99
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Waksman S. A., Henrici A. T. 1948; Actinomycetaceae Buchanan. In Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 6th ed.. p. 901 Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company;
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Waksman S. A., Horning E., Welsch M., Woodruff H. B. 1942; Distribution of antagonistic actinomycetes in nature. Soil Sci 54:281
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-27-1-1
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-27-1-1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error