1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Preparations of the Rothamsted culture of tobacco necrosis virus always gave two and usually three zones when centrifuged in sucrose density gradients. The top zone consisted of polyhedral particles with a sedimentation constant of 50 S, the middle zone of larger polyhedral particles with 116 S, and the bottom zone when present, consisted of the 50 S particles aggregated in groups of 12. Neither the small particles (50 S) nor their aggregates were infective when inoculated either to tobacco or French bean plants, but they became so when inoculated together with the large particles (116S). The small and large particles are serologically unrelated and seem to be different viruses, one of which depends on the other for some process that allows it to multiply to detectable amounts.

The Rothamsted culture produces local lesions of different sizes in French bean. Virus isolated from single large lesions and passed through a succession of single lesions gave, when bulked in tobacco, preparations containing up to 500 large to 1 small particle. Evidence is given which suggests that the few small particles were acquired as contaminants when the virus was bulked in tobacco, and it seems probable that small particles would not be produced in leaves infected only with the large particles. Virus obtained from small lesions when bulked gave preparations containing particles of both sizes, with ratios of large to small particles up to 1:10. Inocula of large particles produced only large lesions, whereas mixed inocula produced large and small lesions, in proportions which depended on the ratio of the two kinds of particles in the inoculum. Two different tobacco necrosis viruses activated the small particles, but tobacco mosaic and some other viruses did not.

Particles of the two activating viruses differed in size and in their stability when negatively stained in phosphotungstate. When fixed and negatively stained they appeared to be angular, but much less so than when shadowed. Small particles tended to pack in regular arrays, and one type of packing suggested that they have a fivefold axis of symmetry.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-25-3-459
1961-07-01
2022-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/25/3/mic-25-3-459.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-25-3-459&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bawden F. C. 1941; The serological reactions of viruses causing tobacco necrosis. Brit. J. exp. Path 22:59
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bawden F. C., Kassanis B. 1947; Primula obconica, a carrier of tobacco necrosis viruses. Ann. appl. Biol 34:127
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bawden F. C., Pirie N. W. 1942; A preliminary description of preparations of some of the viruses causing tobacco necrosis. Brit. J. exp. Path 23:314
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bawden F. C., Pirie N. W. 1945; Further studies on the purification and properties of a virus causing tobacco necrosis. Brit. J. exp. Path 26:277
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bawden F. C., Pirie N. W. 1950; Some factors affecting the activation of virus preparations made from tobacco leaves infected with a tobacco necrosis virus. J. gen. Microbiol 4:464
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bawden F. C., Pirie N. W. 1957; A virus-inactivating system from tobacco leaves. J. gen. Microbiol 16:696
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bercks R. 1960; Serological relationships between beet mosaic virus, potato virus Y and bean yellow mosaic virus. Virology 12:311
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brakke M. K. 1953; Zonal separation by density gradient centrifugation. Arch. Biochim. Biophys 45:275
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fulton J. P. 1952; A tobacco necrosis virus associated with strawberry plants. Plant Dis. Reptr 36:313
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Harrison B. D., Nixon H. L. 1959; Separation and properties of particles of tobacco rattle virus with different lengths. J. gen. Microbiol 21:569
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harrison B. D., Nixon H. L. 1960; Purification and electron microscopy of three soil-borne plant viruses. Virology 12:104
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kassanis B. 1960; Comparison of the early stages of infection by intact and phenol-disrupted tobacco necrosis virus. Virology 10:353
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kassanis B. 1961; The transmission of potato aucuba mosaic virus by aphids from plants also infected by potato viruses A or Y. Virology 13:93
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kassanis B., Nixon H. L. 1960; Activation of one plant virus by another. Nature; Lond: 187713
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lauffer M. A. 1944; The influence of concentration upon the sedimentation rate of tobacco mosaic virus. J. Amer. Chem. Soc 66:1195
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nixon H. L., Fisher H. L. 1958; An improved spray droplet technique for quantitative electron microscopy. Brit. J. appl. Phys 9:68
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ogston A. G. 1942; Addendum: Examination in the ultracentrifuge. Brit. J. exp. Path 23:328
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pirie N. W., Smith K. M., Spooner E. T. C., McClement W. D. 1938; Purified preparations of tobacco necrosis virus (Nicotiana virus II). Parasitology 30:543
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rochow W. F., Ross A. F. 1955; Virus multiplication in plants doubly infected with potato viruses X and Y. Virology 1:10
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith K. M., Bald J. G. 1935; A description of a necrotic virus disease affecting tobacco and other plants. Parasitology 27:231
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wetter C., Quantz L., Brandes J. 1959; Verwandtschaft zwischen dem Stauchevirus der Erbse und dem Rotkleeademmosaik-Virus (red clover vein mosaic virus). Phytopath. Z 35:201
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-25-3-459
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-25-3-459
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error