1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: The limitations of methods previously used for counting rumen ciliates, and the value of developing a method of known accuracy, are discussed. Two counting-chambers, one based on the Sedgwick-Rafter cell, the other on the MacMaster eelworm-counting cell, were constructed and tested. A MacMaster-type cell was adopted. The preparations of suitable suspensions for counting organisms from washed suspensions and from rumen contents are described. The counting technique adopted was found to be reliable; its accuracy depends upon the number of organisms counted. In one sheep on a constant diet, day-to-day differences in rumen ciliate population were far greater than the differences found throughout the rumen at any one time, or the variations due to technique.

Erratum

An erratum has been published for this content:
CORRIGENDA
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-17-2-414
1957-10-01
2021-10-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/17/2/mic-17-2-414.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-17-2-414&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adam K. M. G. 1951; The quantity and distribution of the ciliate protozoa in the large intestine of the horse. Parasitology 41:301
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adam K. M. G. 1953; In vivo observations on the ciliate protozoa inhabiting the large intestine of the horse. J. gen. Microbiol 9:376
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anscombe F. J. 1948; The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 35:246
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferber K. E. 1928; Die Zahl und Masse der Infusorien im Pansen und ihre Bedeutung für den Eiweissaufbau der Wiederkäuer. Z. Tierz. ZüchtBiol 12:31
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferber K. E., Winogradawa-Federowa T. 1929; Zählung und Teilungsquote der Infusorien im Pansen der Wiederkauer. Biol. Zbl 49(6):321
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilbert J. Y. 1942; The errors of the Sedgwick-Rafter counting chamber in the enumeration of Phytoplankton. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc 61:217
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gutierrez J. 1955; Experiments on the culture and physiology of holotrichs from the bovine rumen. Biochem. J 60:516
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall R. P., Johnson D. F., Loefer J. B. 1935; A method for counting protozoa in the measurement of growth under experimental conditions. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc 54:298
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Heald P. J., Oxford A. E., Sugden B. 1952; A convenient method for preparing massive suspensions of virtually bacteria-free ciliate protozoa of the genera Isotricha and Dasytricha for monometric studies. Nature; Lond: 1691055
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hungate R. E. 1942; The culture of Eudiplodinium neglectum, with experiments on the digestion of cellulose. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole 83:303
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson B. C., Hamilton R. S., Robinson W. R., Garey J. C. 1944; On the mechanism of non-protein-nitrogen utilization by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci 3:287
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mangold E. 1929 Handbuch der Ernährung und des Stoffwechsels der Landmirtschaftlichen Nutztiere Band II Berlin: Julius Springer;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Moir R. J. 1951; The seasonal variation in the ruminal micro-organisms of grazing sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res 2:322
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Moir R. J., Somers M. 1956; A factor influencing the protozoal population in Sheep. Nature; Lond: 1781472
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mowry H. A., Becker E. R. 1930; Experiments on the biology of infusoria inhabiting the rumen of goats. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci 5:35
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Oxford A. E. 1955; The rumen protozoa: their chemical composition, metabolism, requirements for maintenance and culture and physiological significance for the host. Exp. Parasitol 4:569
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Quenouille M. H. 1950 Introductory Statistics London: Butterworth-Springer;
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Student 1907; On the error of counting with a haemocytometer. Biometrika 5351
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wath J. G.Van der, Myburgh S. 1941; Studies on the alimentary tract of merino sheep in South Africa. VI. The role of infusoria in ruminant digestion with some remarks on ruminant bacteria. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci 17:61
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Weller R. A., Gray F. V. 1954; The passage of starch through the stomach of the sheep. J. exp. Biol 31:40
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams V. J., Moir R. J. 1951; Ruminal Flora Studies in the sheep. III. The influence of different sources of nitrogen upon nitrogen retention and upon the total number of free micro-organisms in the rumen. Aust. J. sci. Res 4B:377
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-17-2-414
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-17-2-414
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error