1887

Abstract

Summary: Indole synthesis from glucose, ammonium chloride and serine by washed suspensions of 7–4 was inhibited by bacteriostatic concentrations of chloramphenicol and the tetracyclines (Aureomycin, Terramycin, and Achromycin). Indole synthesis was also inhibited by streptomycin but only by concentrations higher than those necessary for bacteriostasis. The inhibition by chloramphenicol and the tetracyclines does not appear to be due to inhibition of adaptive enzyme formation because these antibiotics still inhibited indole synthesis when added to suspensions which were forming indole at maximum rate. Streptomycin, in the same type of test, seemed to inhibit some adaptive process.

Indole synthesis by suspensions of antibiotic-resistant variants of 7–4 was not inhibited by concentrations of antibiotics which inhibited synthesis by the parent strain. Suspensions of organisms resistant to high concentrations of streptomycin formed at least the same amount of indole in the presence of any concentration of streptomycin tested, as they did in its absence. Streptomycin often stimulated indole synthesis by such organisms. Suspensions of organisms which required streptomycin for growth, after growth in suboptimal concentrations of streptomycin, did not produce appreciable amounts of indole. The addition of streptomycin restored the activity in organisms grown in a liquid defined medium but did not do so with organisms grown on heart infusion agar. Streptomycin-resistant and streptomycin-dependent strains resembled the parent strain in that they utilized malate +pyruvate, or oxalacetate, for indole formation in place of glucose. Strains resistant to various concentrations of chloramphenicol, Aureomycin and Terramycin showed a correlation between the amounts of antibiotic required to inhibit indole synthesis and to inhibit growth in a glucose + tryptophan + inorganic salts medium. The results indicate that some of the antibiotics interfere, either directly or indirectly, with indole synthesis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-15-3-446
1956-12-01
2024-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/15/3/mic-15-3-446.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-15-3-446&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bergmann E. D., Sicher S. 1952; Mode of action of chloramphenicol. Nature; Lond: 170931
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergmann E. D., Sicher S., Volcani B. E. 1954; The action of Chloromycetin, Aureomycin and Terramycin on the biosynthesis of indole in Escherichia coli. Bull. Res. Court. Israel 4:19
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis B. D., Mingioli E. 1950; Mutants of Escherichia coli requiring methionine or vitamin B12. J. Bact 60:17
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Foster J. W., Pittillo R. F. 1953; Metabolite reversal of antibiotic inhibition, especially reversal of Aureomycininhibition by riboflavin. J. Bact 66:478
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gale E. F., Folkes J. P. 1953; The assimilation of amino acids by bacteria. 15. Actions of antibiotics on nucleic acid and protein synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem. J 53:493
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson M. I., Gibson F. 1951; Development of resistance to dihydrostreptomycin by Bacterium coli. Nature; Lond: 167113
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gibson F., Jones M. J., Teltscher H. 1955a; Synthesis of indole and anthranilic acid by mutants of Escherichia coli. Nature; Lond: 175853
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibson F., Jones M. J., Teltscher H. 1955b; Effect of antibiotics on indole synthesis by Escherichia coli 7–4. Nature; Lond: 176164
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibson F., Jones M. J., Teltscher H. 1956; The synthesis of indole by washed cell suspensions of Escherichia coli. Biochem. J 64:132
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hahn F. E., Wisseman C. L. 1951; Inhibition of adaptive enzyme formation by antimicrobial agents. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y 76:533
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Herrel W. E., Heilman F. R., Wellman W. E. 1950; Some bacteriologic, pharmacologic and clinical observations on Terramycin. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 53:448
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Oginsky E. L., Smith P. H., Umbreit W. W. 1949; The action of streptomycin. I. The nature of the reaction inhibited. J. Bact 58:747
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pansy F. E., Khan P., Pagano J. F., Donovick R. 1950; The relationship between Aureomycin, chloramphenicol and Terramycin. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y 75:618
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Roote S. M., Polglase W. J. 1955; The effect of dihydrostreptomycin on the formation of adaptive enzymes by a strain of Escherichia coli. Canad. J. Biochem. Physiol 33:792
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Saz A. K., Marmur J. 1953; The inhibition of organic nitro-reductase by Aureomycin in cell-free extracts. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y 82:783
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith P. H., Oginsky E. L., Umbreit W. W. 1949; The action of streptomycin. II. The metabolic properties of resistant and dependent strains. J. Bact 58:761
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Truhaut R., Lambin S., Boyer M. 1951; Contribution a l’étude du mécanisme d’action de la chloromycétine vis-à-vis d’Eberthella typhi role du tryptophane. Bull. Soc. Chim. biol., Paris 33:387
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Umbreit W. W. 1952; The mode of action of streptomycin in Symposium sur le Mode d’Action des Antibiotiques. p. 63 Paris: Sedes;
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wisseman C. L., Smadel J. E., Hahn F. E., Hopps H. E. 1954; Mode of action of chloramphenicol. I. Action of chloramphenicol on assimilation of ammonia and on synthesis of proteins and nucleic acids in Escherichia coli. J. Bact 67:662
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Woolley D. W. 1950; A study of non-competitive antagonism with Chloromycetin and related analogues of phenylalanine. J. biol. Chem 185:293
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-15-3-446
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-15-3-446
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error