1887

Abstract

Summary:Direct observation techniques were used to determine the antibiotic effects of eight actinomycete species on in soil and In actinomycete-inoculated sterilized soils, the inhibition of germination of fungal spores corresponded with the degree of inhibition of the fungus produced by the same actinomycetes in Petri plate culture. The effects of the actinomycetes on the vegetative growth of in soybean-supplemented soils varied with the individual actinomycetes and, with one exception, were identical with the effects caused by the actinomycete antibiotics These hyphal changes in soil included: suspension of further mycelial development; lysis; characteristic morphological effects such as stunting, distortion, excessive branching and the formation of hyphal protuberances. Lysis of the fungal hyphae only occurred in the presence of soil and was shown to be due to the combined effect of the antibiotic and some unidentified soil factor. Evidence was also obtained which demonstrated the ability of the actinomycetes to produce antibiotics in unsupplemented soils. Additional proof of antibiotic activity in soil was obtained by using the antibiotic actinomycin and strains of , the organism responsible for its production. In Petri plate culture, both crystalline actinomycin and the actinomycetes produced a characteristic swelling, distortion and stunting of the vegetative growth of When introduced into sterile soils, identical morphological changes were evidenced by the fungus in the presence of either the pure antibiotic or the actinomycetes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-15-2-372
1956-10-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/15/2/mic-15-2-372.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-15-2-372&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Blair I.D. 1943; Behaviour of the fungus Rhizoctonia solani Kühn in the soil. Ann. appl. Biol. 30:118
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blair I.D. 1945; Techniques for soil fungus studies. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A 26:258
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brian P.W., Curtis P.J., Hemming H.G. 1946; A substance causing abnormal development of fungal hyphae produced by Penicillium janczewskii Zal. Trans. Brit, mycol. Soc. 29:173
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chinn S.H.F. 1953; A slide technique for the study of fungi and actinomycetes in soil with special reference to Helminthosporium sativum. Canad. J. Bot. 31:718
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen J.J., Davies F.R. 1940; Variation in Helminthosporium sativum produced by Bacillus mesentericus. Phytopathology 30:1017
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dobbs C.G., Hinson W.H. 1953; A widespread fungistasis in soils. Nature; Lond.: 172197
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gottlieb D., Siminoff P. 1952; The production and role of antibiotics in soil. II. Chloromycetin. Phytopathology 42:91
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gregory K.F., Allen O.N., Riker A.J., Peterson W.H. 1952; Antibiotics as agents for the control of certain damping-off fungi. Amer. J. Bot. 6:405
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grossbard E. 1952; Antibiotic production by fungi on organic manures and in soil. J. gen. Microbiol. 6:295
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jefferys E.G., Hemming H.G. 1953; Fungistasis in soils. Nature; Lond.: 172872
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lachance R.O. 1951; Antagonisme des Microorganismes du Sol Envers le Colletotrichum Linicola, Agent de l’Anthracnose du Lin. Canad. J. Bot. 29:438
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Legge B.J. 1952; Use of glass fibre material in soil mycology. Nature; Lond.: 169759
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchell R.B., Hooton D.R., Clark F.E. 1941; Soil bacteriological studies on the control of the Phymatotrichum. Root-rot of cotton. J. Agric. Res. 63:535
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Reilly H.C., Schatz A., Waksman S.A. 1945; Antifungal properties of some antibiotic substances. J. Bact. 49:585
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rombouts J.E. 1953; Abnormal development of fungi induced by antibiotics. Proc. VI Congr. int. Microbiol. 5:205
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Stevenson I.L. 1956; Antibiotic activity of actinomycetes in soil and their controlling effects on root-rot of wheat. J. gen. Microbiol. 14:440
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tveit M. 1953; Control of seed-borne diseases of cereals by Chaetomium cochlioides, Pall. Proc. VI Congr. int. Microbiol. 6:350
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-15-2-372
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-15-2-372
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error