1887

Abstract

Sixty-four strains of were isolated from fermentation samples from 23 malt whisky distilleries located in the major whisky producing regions of Scotland. The strains were assigned to 26 ribotype patterns. Strains of some ribotype patterns were widely distributed and recovered from distilleries throughout Scotland, while strains representing other ribotypes were particular to a specific region or even a certain distillery. Repeated sampling of a single distillery over a 12 month period showed that the range of bacteria present, as indicated by ribotyping, was stable, but was influenced by changes in malt supply and the period of closure for annual maintenance. Partial 16S rDNA sequence analysis of ribotype representatives revealed , , and as the major species present in the distilleries; however, four isolates could not be identified by this procedure. Determination of the full 16S rDNA gene sequence from one of these isolates (strain R7-84) revealed >985% similarity to and its phylogenetic neighbours. DNA from two other strains showed greater than 70% hybridization to DNA from R7-84 under non-stringent renaturation conditions and DNA from strain R7-84 shared less than 65% hybridization with members of the group. It is proposed that these three strains should be placed in a new species for which the name represented by the type strain R7-84 is suggested.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-147-4-1007
2001-04-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/147/4/1471007a.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-147-4-1007&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Banks, J. G. E. A. ( 1998; ). Detection and identification of Lactobacillus lindneri from brewery environments. J Inst Brew 104, 47-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryan-Jones, D. G. ( 1975; ). Lactic acid bacteria in distillery fermentations. In Lactic Acid Bacteria in Beverages and Foods , pp. 165-176. Edited by J. G. Carr, C. V. Cutting & G. C. Whiting. London:Academic Press.
  3. Collins, M. D., Rodrigues, U. M., Ash, C., Aguirre, M., Farrow, J. A. E., Martinez-Murcia, A., Phillips, B. A., Wiliams, A. M. & Wallbanks, S. ( 1991; ). Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 77, 5-12.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dellaglio, F. L., Dicks, M. T., Du Toit, M. & Torriani, S. ( 1991; ). Designation of ATCC 334 in place of ATCC 393 (NCDO 61) as the neotype strain of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei and rejection of the name Lactobacillus paracasei (Collins et al., 1989): request for an opinion. Int J Syst Bacteriol 41, 340-342.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Silva, S., Pettersson, B., Aquino de Muro, M. & Priest, F. G. ( 1998; ). A DNA probe for the detection and identification of Bacillus sporothermodurans using the 23S–16S rDNA spacer region and phylogenetic analysis of some field isolates which form highly heat resistant endospores. Syst Appl Microbiol 21, 398-407.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dolan, T. C. S. ( 1974; ). Some aspects of the impact of brewing science on Scotch whisky fermentations. J Inst Brew 82, 177-181.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Du Plessis, E. M. & Dicks, L. M. T. ( 1995; ). Evaluation of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR as a method to differentiate Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus amylovorans, Lactobacillus gallinarum, Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus johnsonii. Curr Microbiol 31, 114-118.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Felsenstein, J. (1993). phylip: Phylogeny Inference Package, version 3.51c. Seattle, WA: Department of Genetics, University of Washington.
  9. Fitzsimons, N. A., Cogan, T. M., Condon, S. & Beresford, T. ( 1999; ). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of non-starter lactic acid bacteria in mature Cheddar cheese. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 3418-3426.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Geddes, P. A. & Riffkin, H. L. ( 1989; ). Influence of lactic acid bacteria on aldehyde, ester and higher alcohol formation during Scotch whisky fermentations. In Distilled Beverage Flavour , pp. 193-199. Edited by J. R. Piggot & A. Paterson. Chichester:Ellis Horwood.
  11. Giraffa, G., Gatti, M., Rossetti, L., Senini, L. & Neviani, E. ( 2000; ). Molecular diversity within Lactobacillus helveticus as revealed by genotypic characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 1259-1265.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grimont, F. & Grimont, P. A. D. ( 1986; ). Ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene restriction patterns as potential taxonomic tools. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 137B, 165-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayford, A. E., Petersen, A., Vogensen, F. K. & Jakobsen, M. ( 1999; ). Use of conserved randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fragments and RAPD pattern for characterization of Lactobacillus fermentum in Ghanaian fermented maize dough. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 3213-3221.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jahnz, U., Fitch, A. & Priest, F. G. ( 1996; ). Evaluation of an rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe for the detection of mosquitocidal strains of Bacillus sphaericus in soils – characterization of novel strains lacking toxin genes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 20, 91-99.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Johansson, M.-L., Quednau, M., Ahrné, S. & Molin, G. ( 1995; ). Classification of Lactobacillus plantarum by restriction endonuclease analysis of total chromosomal DNA using conventional agarose gel electrophoresis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 670-675.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jukes, T. H. & Cantor, C. R. ( 1969; ). Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism , pp. 21-132. Edited by H. N. Munro. New York:Academic Press.
  17. Kandler, O. & Kunath, P. ( 1983; ). Lactobacillus kefir sp. nov., a component of the microflora of kefir. Syst Appl Microbiol 4, 286-294.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MacKenzie, K. G. & Kenny, M. C. ( 1965; ). Non-volatile organic acid and pH changes during the fermentation of distiller’s wort. J Inst Brew 71, 160-165.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Maidak, B. L., Cole, J. R., Parker, C. T., Jr & 11 other authors ( 1999; ). A new version of the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Res 27, 171–173.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Makanjuola, D. B. & Springham, D. G. ( 1984; ). Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from different stages of the Scotch whisky fermentation. J Inst Brew 90, 13-19.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mori, K., Yamazaki, K., Ishiyama, T., Katsumata, M., Kobayashi, K., Kawai, Y., Inoue, N. & Shinano, H. ( 1997; ). Comparative sequence analyses of the genes coding for 16S rRNA of Lactobacillus casei-related taxa. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 54-57.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nielsen, P., Fritze, D. & Priest, F. G. ( 1995; ). Phenetic diversity of alkaliphilic Bacillus strains; proposal for nine new species. Microbiology 141, 1745-1761.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Olive, D. M. & Bean, P. ( 1999; ). Principles and applications of methods for DNA-based typing of microbial organisms. J Clin Microbiol 37, 1661-1669.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Palmer, G. H. ( 1997; ). Scientific review of Scotch malt whisky. Ferment 10, 367-379.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pilone, G. J., Clayton, M. G. & Van Duivendoben, R. J. ( 1991; ). Characterization of wine lactic acid bacteria: single broth culture tests of heterofermentation, mannitol from fructose and ammonia from arginine. Am J Enol Vitic 42, 153-157.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Priest, F. G. & Barbour, E. A. ( 1985; ). Numerical taxonomy of lactic acid bacteria and some related taxa. In Computer-Assisted Bacterial Systematics , pp. 137-163. Edited by M. Goodfellow, D. Jones & F. G. Priest. London:Academic Press.
  27. Rodtong, S. & Tannock, G. W. ( 1993; ). Differentiation of Lactobacillus strains by ribotyping. Appl Environ Microbiol 59, 3480-3484.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Saitou, N. & Nei, M. ( 1987; ). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406-425.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Schleifer, K. H. & Ludwig, W. ( 1995; ). Phylogeny of the genus Lactobacillus and related genera. Syst Appl Microbiol 18, 461-467.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith, S. (1992). GDE: Genetic Data Environment, version 2.2. Ann Arbor, MI: Millipore Imaging Systems.
  31. Sohier, D., Coulon, J. & Lonvaud-Funel, A. ( 1999; ). Molecular identification of Lactobacillus hilgardii and genetic relatedness with Lactobacillus brevis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 1075-1081.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Stackebrandt, E. & Goebel, B. M. ( 1994; ). Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 846-849.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tynkkynen, S., Satokari, R., Saarela, M., Mattila-Sandholm, T. & Saxelin, M. ( 1999; ). Comparison of ribotyping, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in typing of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 3908-3914.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Walter, J., Tannock, G. W., Tilsala-Timisjarvi, A., Rodtong, S., Loach, D. M., Munro, K. & Alatossova, T. ( 2000; ). Detection and identification of gastrointestinal Lactobacillus species using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and species-specific primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 297-303.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ward, L. J. & Timmins, M. J. ( 1999; ). Differentiation of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus by polymerase chain reaction. Lett Appl Microbiol 29, 90-92.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wayne, L. G. ( 1994; ). Actions of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology on requests for opinions published between January 1985 and July 1993. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 177-178.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhong, W., Millsap, K., Bialkowska-Hobrzanska, H. & Reid, G. ( 1998; ). Differentiation of Lactobacillus species by molecular typing. Appl Environ Microbiol 64, 2418-2423.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-147-4-1007
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-147-4-1007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error