1887

Abstract

Two overlapping promoters, and , direct the transcription of the gene of . The proximal promoter, , is induced upon entry into stationary phase under the control of Eσ, the RNA polymerase that uses the σ (RpoS) sigma factor. Transcription from the distal promoter, , is independent of σ. Previous analysis demonstrated that the osmolarity of the growth medium modulates expression of both promoters. The use of an genomic library showed that the cloned gene was able to stimulate transcription of an reporter fusion. NhaR is a positive regulator of the LysR family, previously identified as an activator of , a gene encoding a Na/H antiporter involved in adaptation to Na and alkaline pH in and other enteric bacteria. NhaR was shown to activate only the expression of and to be necessary for the induction of this promoter by LiCl, NaCl and sucrose. Therefore, activation by NhaR is responsible for the osmotic induction of . In contrast to its action on , NhaR activation of is independent of H-NS. Activation of by NhaR requires a site located just upstream of the atypical −35 region of the promoter.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-147-10-2795
2001-10-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/147/10/1472795a.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-147-10-2795&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arnold C. N., McElhanon J., Lee A., Leonhart R., Siegele D. A. 2001; Global analysis of Escherichia coli gene expression during the acetate-induced acid tolerance response. J Bacteriol 183:2178–2186 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachmann B. J. 1996; Derivations and genotypes of some mutant derivatives of Escherichia coli K-12. . In Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology pp 2460–2488 Edited by Neidhardt F. C.and others Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouvier J., Gordia S., Kampmann G., Lange R., Hengge-Aronis R., Gutierrez C. 1998; Interplay between global regulators of Escherichia coli : effect of RpoS, Lrp and H-NS on transcription of the gene osmC . Mol Microbiol 28:971–980 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carmel O., Rahav-Manor O., Dover N., Shaanan B., Padan E. 1997; The Na+ specific interaction between the LysR-type regulator, NhaR, and the nhaA gene encoding the Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli . EMBO J 16:5922–5229 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Casadaban M. J. 1976; Transposition and fusion of the lac genes to selected promoters in Escherichia coli using bacteriophage lambda and Mu. J Mol Biol 104:541–555 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Conter A., Gangneux C., Suzanne M., Gutierrez C. 2001; Survival of Escherichia coli during long-term starvation: effects of aeration, NaCl and the rpoS and osmC gene products. Res Microbiol 152:17–26 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Debarbouille M., Shuman H. A., Silhavy T. J., Schwartz M. 1978; Dominant constitutive mutations in malT , the positive regulator gene of the maltose regulon in Escherichia coli . J Mol Biol 124:359–371 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dover N., Padan E. 2001; Transcription of nhaA , the main Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli , is regulated by Na+- and growth phase. J Bacteriol 183:644–653 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dover N., Higgins C. F., Carmel O., Rimon A., Pinner E., Padan E. 1996; Na+-induced transcription of nhaA , which encodes an Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli , is positively regulated by nhaR and affected by hns . J Bacteriol 178:6508–6517
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldberg E. B., Arbel T., Chen J., Karpel R., Mackie G. A., Schuldiner S., Padan E. 1987; Characterization of a Na+/H+ antiporter gene of Escherichia coli . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2615–2619 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gordia S., Gutierrez C. 1996; Growth-phase-dependent expression of the osmotically inducible gene osmC of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol 19:729–736 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gutierrez C., Devedjian J. C. 1991; Osmotic induction of gene osmC expression in Escherichia coli K12. J Mol Biol 220:959–973 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hengge-Aronis R. 1996a; Back to log phase: sigma S as a global regulator in the osmotic control of gene expression in Escherichia coli . Mol Microbiol 21:887–893 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hengge-Aronis R. 1996b; Regulation of gene expression during entry into stationary phase. . In Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology pp 1497–1512 Edited by Neidhardt F. C.and others Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hengge-Aronis R. 1999; Interplay of global regulators and cell physiology in the general stress response of Escherichia coli . Curr Opin Microbiol 2:148–152 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hengge-Aronis R., Lange R., Henneberg N., Fischer D. 1993; Osmotic regulation of rpoS -dependent genes in Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 175:259–265
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Karpel R., Olami Y., Taglicht D., Schuldiner S., Padan E. 1988; Sequencing of the gene ant which affects the Na+/H+ antiporter activity in Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem 263:10408–10414
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Karpel R., Alon T., Glaser G., Schuldiner S., Padan E. 1991; Expression of a sodium proton antiporter (NhaA) in Escherichia coli is induced by Na+ and Li+ ions. J Biol Chem 266:21753–21759
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kohara Y., Akiyama K., Isono K. 1987; The physical map of the whole E. coli chromosome: application of a new strategy for rapid analysis and sorting of a large genomic library. Cell 50:495–508 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kolter R., Siegele D. A., Tormo A. 1993; The stationary phase of the bacterial life cycle. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:855–874 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McCann M. P., Kidwell J. P., Matin A. 1991; The putative sigma factor KatF has a central role in development of starvation-mediated general resistance in Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 173:4188–4194
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mellies J., Wise A., Villarejo M. 1995; Two different Escherichia coli proP promoters respond to osmotic and growth phase signals. J Bacteriol 177:144–151
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller J. H. 1992 A Short Course in Molecular Genetics Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory;
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mongkolsuk S., Praituan W., Loprasert S., Fuangthong M., Chamnongpol S. 1998; Identification and characterization of a new organic hydroperoxide resistance ( ohr ) gene with a novel pattern of oxidative stress regulation from Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli . J Bacteriol 180:2636–2643
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Padan E., Schuldiner S. 1994; Molecular physiology of the Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli . J Exp Biol 196:443–456
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pichoff S., Vollrath B., Touriol C., Bouche J. P. 1995; Deletion analysis of gene minE which encodes the topological specificity factor of cell division in Escherichia coli . Mol Microbiol 18:321–329 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Polard P., Chandler M. 1995; An in vivo transposase-catalyzed single-stranded DNA circularization reaction. Genes Dev 9:2846–2858 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rahav-Manor O., Carmel O., Karpel R., Taglicht D., Glaser G., Schuldiner S., Padan E. 1992; NhaR, a protein homologous to a family of bacterial regulatory proteins (LysR), regulates nhaA , the sodium proton antiporter gene in Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem 267:10433–10438
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F., Maniatis T. 1989 Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory;
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Silhavy T. J., Berman M., Enquist L. 1984 Experiments with Gene Fusions Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory;
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ton-Hoang B., Betermier M., Polard P., Chandler M. 1997; Assembly of a strong promoter following IS 911 circularization and the role of circles in transposition. EMBO J 16:3357–3371 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Vidal-Ingigliardi D., Raibaud O. 1985; A convenient technique to compare the efficiency of promoters in Escherichia coli . Nucleic Acids Res 13:5919–5926 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Volker U., Andersen K. K., Antelmann H., Devine K. M., Hecker M. 1998; One of two osmC homologs in Bacillus subtilis is part of the sigmaB-dependent general stress regulon. J Bacteriol 180:4212–4218
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-147-10-2795
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-147-10-2795
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error