1887

Abstract

The hypothesis that biodegradable surfactants stimulate the attachment of biodegradation-competent bacteria to surfaces has been re-evaluated using a variant of the surfactant-degrading bacterium sp. DES1 designated sp. DES2. This variant was identical to the parental strain in terms of its carbon-utilization patterns and alcohol dehydrogenase and alkylsulfatase complements (enzymes involved in surfactant biodegradation), but differed markedly in its growth characteristics when using sodium dodecyl triethoxysulfate or triethylene glycol dodecyl ether as secondary carbon sources. sp. DES1 exhibited diauxie in these surfactant-based culture media in contrast to sp. DES2, which exhibited single-phase growth. sp. DES2 did not attach to river sediment in a microcosm system when challenged with a dose of either surfactant, although it did biodegrade the substrate. In contrast, sp. DES1 attached to the river sediment whilst biodegrading the test substrate. It is concluded that the ether-scission system, which is responsible for primary biodegradation of both substrates, is deregulated in sp. DES2 in contrast to that in sp. DES1, and that, contrary to a previous hypothesis, biodegradable surfactants do not necessarily stimulate the attachment of biodegradation-competent bacteria during their biodegradation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-143-11-3649
1997-11-01
2021-07-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/143/11/mic-143-11-3649.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-143-11-3649&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anderson D.J., Day M.J., Russell N.J., White G.F. 1988; Temporal and geographical distributions of epithilic sodium dodecyl sulfate-degrading bacteria in a polluted South Wales river.. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:555–560
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aronstein B.N., Alexander M. 1993; Effect of a non-ionic surfactant added to the soil surface on the biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons within the soil.. Appl Microbiol Bio-technol 39:386–390
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aronstein B.N., Calvillo Y.M., Alexander M. 1991; Effect of surfactants at low concentrations on the desorption and biode-gradation of sorbed aromatic compounds in soil.. Environ Sci & Technol 25:1728–1731
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarke K.R., Joint I.R. 1986; Methodology for estimating numbers of free-living and attached bacteria in estuarine water.. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:1110–1120
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Costerton J.W. 1984; Direct ultrastructural examination of adherent bacterial populations in natural and pathogenic eco-systems.. In Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology pp. 115–123 Klug M.J., Reddy C.A. Edited by Washington, DC:: American Society for Microbiology.;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards D.A., Adeel Z., Luthy R.G. 1994; Distribution of nonionic surfactant and phenanthrene in a sediment/aqueous system.. Environ Sci & Technol 28:1550–1560
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fendinger N.J., Versteg D.J., Weeg E., Dyer S., Rapaport R.A. 1994; Environmental behavior and fate of anionic surfactants.. In Environmental Chemistry of Lakes and Reservoirs pp. 527–557 Baker L.A. Edited by Washington, DC:: American Chemical Society.;
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fletcher M. 1991; The physiological activity of bacteria attached to solid surfaces.. Adv Microb Physiol 32:53–85
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Geesey G.C., Mutch R., Green R.B., Costerton J.W. 1978; Sessile bacteria: an important component of the microbial population in small mountain streams.. Limnol Oceanogr 23:1214–1223
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Griffiths E.T., Hales S.G., Russell N.J., White G.F. 1987; Identification of hydrophobic metabolites formed during biode-gradation of alkyl ethoxysulfate surfactants by Pseudomonas sp. DES1.. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 9:217–229
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hales S.G. 1981 Microbial degradation of linear ethoxylate sulfates. PhD thesis University of Wales, UK.:
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hales S.G., Dodgson K.S., White G.F., Jones N., Watson G.K. 1982; Initial stages in the biodegradation of the surfactant sodium dodecyltriethoxy sulfate by Pseudomonas sp. strain DES1.. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:790–800
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hales S.G., Watson G.K., Dodgson K.S., White G.F. 1986; A comparative study of the biodegradation of the surfactant sodium dodecyl triethoxysulfate by four detergent-degrading bacteria.. J Gen Microbiol 132:953–961
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayashi K. 1975; A rapid determination of sodium dodecyl sulfate with methylene blue.. Anal Biochem 67:503–506
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hermansson M., Marshall K.C. 1985; Utilization of surface localized substrate by non-adhesive marine bacteria.. Microb Ecol 11:91–105
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Holm P.E., Nielson P.H., Albrechtsen H.-J., Christensen T.H. 1992; Importance of unattached bacteria and bacteria attached to sediment in determining potentials for degradation of xenobiotic organic contaminants in an aerobic aquifer.. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3020–3026
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kefford B., Kjelieberg S., Marshall K.C. 1982; Bacterial scavenging: utilization of fatty acids localized at a solid-liquid interface.. Arch Microbiol 133:257–260
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ladle M., House W.A., Armitage P.D., Farr I.S. 1989; Faunal characteristics of a site subject to sewage plant discharge.. Tenside Deterg 2:159–168
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Laha S., Luthy R.G. 1992; Effects of nonionic surfactants on the solubilisation and mineralisation of phenanthrene in soil-water systems.. Biotechnol Bioeng 40:1367–1380
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Marchesi J.R. 1992 Anionic surfactant biodegradation in biofilms on mineral particles. PhD thesis University of Wales, UK.:
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Marchesi J.R., House W.A., White G.F., Russell N.J., Farr I.S. 1991a; A comparative study of the adsorption of linear alkyl sulfates and alkylbenzene sulfonates on river sediments.. Colloids Surf 53:63–78
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Marchesi J.R., Russell N.J., White G.F., House W.A. 1991b; Effects of surfactant adsorption and biodegradability on the distribution of bacteria between sediments and water in a freshwater microcosm.. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2507–2513
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Marchesi J.R., Owen S.A., White G.F., House W.A., Russell N.J. 1994a; SDS-degrading bacteria attach to riverine sediment in response to the surfactant or its primary biodegradation product dodecan-1-ol.. Microbiology 140:2999–3006
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Marchesi J.R., White G.F., House W.A., Russell N.J. 1994b; Bacterial cell hydrophobicity is modified during the biodegradation of anionic surfactants.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 124:387–392
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Marshall K.C. 1988; Adhesion and growth of bacteria at surfaces in oligotrophic environments.. Can J Microbiol 34:503–506
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Owen S.A. 1995 Sorption and biodegradation of surfactants by biofilms on river sediments. PhD thesis University of Wales, UK.:
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Russell N.J. 1990; Cold adaptation of microorganisms.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 326:595–611
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Russell N.J., Anderson D.J., Day M.J., White G.F. 1991; Colonization of biofilms by bacteria capable of biodegrading sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at clean and polluted riverine sites.. Microb Ecol 22:85–98
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stotzky G. 1985; Mechanisms of adhesion to clays, with reference to soil systems.. In Bacterial Adhesion: Mechanisms and Physiological Significance pp. 195–253 Savage D.C., Fletcher M. Edited by New York:: Plenum.;
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Technical Committee on Detergents the Environment 1994; Second Report. pp. 53 Department of the Environment, London:: HMSO.;
  31. Thomas O.R.T. 1987 Development of solid support systems for the degradation of surfactants. PhD thesis University of Wales, UK.:
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tidswell E.C., Russell N.J., White G.F. 1996; Ether-bond scission in the biodegradation of alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactants by Pseudomonas sp. strain SC25A.. Microbiology 142:1123–1131
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Verran J., Taylor R. 1995; The effect of surface roughening and conditioning on adhesion.. In The Life and Death of Biofilm pp. 53–59 Wimpenny J., Handley P., Gilbert P., Lappin-Scott H. Edited by Cardiff:: Bioline.;
    [Google Scholar]
  34. White G.F. 1993; Bacterial biodegradation of ethoxylated surfactants.. Pestic Sci 37:159–166
    [Google Scholar]
  35. White G.F. 1994; Pollutant biodegradation: mountain or Mohammed ?. Microbiology 140:685
    [Google Scholar]
  36. White G.F. 1995; Biodegradation of surfactants.. In Preservation of Surfactant Formulations pp. 83–117 Morpeth F. Edited by Glasgow:: Blackie.;
    [Google Scholar]
  37. White G.F., Russell N.J. 1992; Biodegradation of anionic surfactants.. In Surfactants in Lipid Chemistry. Recent Synthetic, Physical, and Biodegradative Studies pp. 99–122 Tyman J.H.P. Edited by Cambridge, UK:: Royal Society for Chemistry.;
    [Google Scholar]
  38. White G.F., Russell N.J., Day M.J. 1985; A survey of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) resistance and alkylsulfatase production from clean and polluted river sites.. Environ Pollut Ser A Ecol Biol 37:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
  39. White G.F., Anderson D.J., Day M.J. 1989; Distribution of planktonic bacteria capable of degrading sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in a polluted South Wales river.. Environ Pollut 57:103–115
    [Google Scholar]
  40. White G.F., Higgins T.P., John D.M. 1997; Multiple mechanisms for biodegradation of nonionic surfactants in bacteria.. In Proceedings, International Symposium on Environmental Biotechnology. Ostende:: Royal Flemish Society of Engineers.;
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wolfaardt G.M., Lawrence J.R., Robarts R.D., Caldwell S.J., Caldwell D.E. 1994; Multicellular organisms in a degradative biofilm community.. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:434–446
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zobell C.E. 1943; The effect of solid surfaces upon bacterial activity.. J Bacteriol 46:39–56
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-143-11-3649
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-143-11-3649
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error