1887

Abstract

The adherence-mediating sites of the 153 kDa adhesin of (MgPa-protein) were characterized at the amino acid sequence level using six monoclonal anti-MgPa antibodies which showed adherence-inhibiting activity. For characterization of the regions to which antibody bound, three segments of the adhesin (N-terminal region, a D1-domain located approximately in the middle of the molecule and a D2-domain located near to the C-terminus) were synthesized as overlapping octapeptides. These regions were chosen in analogy to the three domains of that are involved in the adhesion process. Whereas two monoclonal antibodies (mAb 5B11 and mAb 6F3) bound exclusively to an epitope in the N-region, mAb 3B7 and mAb 6A2 reacted with two distinct epitopes of the D2-domain only. Binding to short synthetic peptides of different regions was analysed for mAb 3A12 (N-region and D1-region) and mAb 2B6 (N-region and D2-region). Close proximity of the N-region and the D2-region in the native MgPa-protein of was indicated in a competitive ELISA test, using freshly harvested cells. Epitope mapping and competition experiments with monoclonal anti-MgPa antibodies revealed interesting differences in the adherence-mediating sites of MgPa and the adhesin (P1-protein) of . Whereas a three-dimensional arrangement of protein loops is suggested for both native adhesins, the MgPa-protein and the P1-protein adherence-mediating epitopes are located in non-homologous regions of these two related proteins. Thus, the two mycoplasma species appear adapted to different host epithelial cells, i.e. to those of the human urogenital tract as the main binding site for and to those of the respiratory tract as the binding site for .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-138-9-1785
1992-09-01
2021-05-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/138/9/mic-138-9-1785.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-138-9-1785&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dallo S. F., Chavoya A., Su C. J., Baseman J. B. 1989; DNA and protein sequence homologies between the adhesins of Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infection and Immunity 57:1059–1065
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dryland A., Sheppard R. C. 1986; Peptide synthesis. Part 8. A system for solid-phase synthesis under low pressure continuous flow conditions. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions I:125–137
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenberg D., Schwarz E., Komaromy M., Wall R. 1984; Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. Journal of Molecular Biology 179:125–142
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Feldner J., Göbel U., Bredt W. 1982; Mycoplasma pneumoniae adhesin localised to tip structure by monoclonal antibody. Nature, London 298:765–767
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerstenecker B., Jacobs E. 1990; Topological mapping of the Pl-adhesin of Mycoplasma pneumoniae with adherence-inhibiting monoclonal antibodies. Journal of General Microbiology 136:471–476
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Geysen H. M., Meloen R. H., Barteling S. J. 1984; Use of peptide synthesis to probe viral antigens for epitopes to a resolution of a single amino acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 81:3998–4002
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayflick L. 1965; Tissue cultures and mycoplasmas. Texas Reports on Biology and Medicine 23:285–303
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hu P. C., Schaper U., Collier A. M., Clyde W. A. Jr, Horikawa M., Huang Y. S., Barile F. M. 1987; A Mycoplasma genitalium protein resembling the Mycoplasma pneumoniae attachment protein. Infection and Immunity 55:1126–1131
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacobs E., Schöpperle K., Bredt W. 1985; Adherence inhibition assay: a specific serological test for detection of antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 4:113–118
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacobs E., Bennewitz A., Bredt W. 1986; Reaction pattern of human anti-Mycoplasma pneumoniae antibodies in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and immunoblotting. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 23:517–522
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacobs E., Watter T., Schaefer H. E., Bredt W. 1991; Comparison of host responses after intranasal infection of guinea-pigs with Mycoplasma genitalium or with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Microbial Pathogenesis 10:221–229
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mader B., Hu P. C., Huang C. H., Schilz E., Jacobs E. 1991; The major MgPa-adhesin of Mycoplasma genitalium. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie 274:507–513
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Razin S., Jacobs E. 1992; Mycoplasma adhesion. Journal of General Microbiology 138:407–422
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Van Regenmortel M. H. V. 1989; Structural and functional approaches to the study of protein antigenicity. Immunology Today 10:266–272
    [Google Scholar]
  15. de St. Groth F. S., Scheidegger D. 1980; Production of monoclonal antibodies: strategy and tactics. Journal of Immunological Methods 35:1–21
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sheppard R. C. 1986; Modem methods of solid-phase peptide synthesis. Science Tools 33:9–16
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-138-9-1785
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-138-9-1785
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error