Multivariate Analysis of Quantitative Chemical and Enzymic Characterization Data in Classification of Actinobacillus, Haemophilus and Pasteurella spp

References

1. Blomquist G., Johanson E., Söderström B., Wold S. 1979; Classification of fungi by means of pyrolysis-gas chromatography-pattern recognition. Journal of Chromatography 173:19–32
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brondz I., Olsen I. 1984; Whole-cell methanolysis as a rapid method for differentiation between Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Haemophilus aphrophilus. Journal of Chromatography 311:347–353
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brondz I., Olsen I. 1985a; Differentiation between major species of the Actinobacillus-Haemophilus-Pasteurella group by gas chromatography of trifluoroacetic acid anhydride derivatives from whole cell methanolysates. Journal of Chromatography 342:13–23
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brondz I., Olsen I. 1985b; Differentiation between closely related organisms within Actinobacillus, Haemophilus, Pasteurella, Streptococcus, and Bacteroides by enzymatic reduction of methylene blue. 2nd European Congress of Clinical Microbiology abstract no.21/9
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brondz I., Olsen I. 1985c; Differentiation amongst major species of the Actinobacillus-Haemophilus-Pasteurella group with EDTA and EDTA/lysozyme. 13th International Congress of Biochemistry (Amsterdam), abstract no. TU-292 p. 304
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brondz I., Olsen I. 1986a; Chemotaxonomy of selected species of the Actinobacillus-Haemophilus-Pasteurella group by means of gas chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and bioenzymatic methods. Journal of Chromatography 380:1–17
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brondz I., Olsen I. 1986b; Microbial chemotaxonomy.Chromatography, electrophoresis and relevant profiling techniques. Journal of Chromatography 379:367–411
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brondz I., Olsen I. 1989; Chemical differences in lipopolysac-charides from Actinobacillus (Haemophilus) actinomycetemcomitansand Haemophilus aphrophilus: clues to differences in periodonto-pathogenic potential and taxonomic distinction. Infection and Immunity 57:3106–3109
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brondz I., Carlsson J., Sjöström M., Sundqvist G. 1989a; Significance of cellular fatty acids and sugars in defining the genus Porphyromonas. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 39:314–318
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brondz I., Olsen I., Sjöström M. 1989b; Gas chromatographic assessment of alcoholyzed fatty acids from yeasts: a new chemotaxonomic method. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 27:2815–2819
    [Google Scholar]
11. Geladi P., Kowalski B. R. 1986; Partial least squares regression: a tutorial. Analytica Chimica Acta 185:1–17
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jellum E., Tingelstad V., Olsen I. 1984; Differentiation between Actinobacillusactinomycetemcomitans and Haemophilusaphrophilus by high-resolution, two-dimensional protein electrophoresis. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 34:478–483
    [Google Scholar]
13. Jollés P., Zowall H., Jaurequi-Adell J., Jollés J. 1962; Nouvelle méthode chromatographique de preparation des lysozymes. Journal of Chromatography 8:363–368
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jolliffe I. T. 1986 Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag;
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kilian M. 1976; A taxonomic study of the genus Haemophilus, with the proposal of a new species. Journal of General Microbiology 93:9–62
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mutters R., Piechulla K., Mannheim W. 1984; Phenotypic differentiation of Pasteurellasensustricto and the Actinobacillus group. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 3:225–229
    [Google Scholar]
17. Olsen I., Brondz I. 1985; Differentiation among closely related organisms of the Actinobacillus-Haemophilus-Pasteurella group by means of lysozyme and EDTA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 22:629–636
    [Google Scholar]
18. Olsen I., Caugant D. A. 1988; Genetic diversity and relationships among strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans, H. aphrophilus and H. paraphrophilus. Journal of Dental Research 67 (special issue) abstract no. 2259 p. 395
    [Google Scholar]
19. Olsen I., Rosseland S. K., Thorsrud A. K., Jellum E. 1987; Differentiation between Haemophilusparaphrophilus, H. aphrophilus, H. influenzae, Actinobacillusactinomycetemcomitans, Pasteurellamultocida, P. haemolytica and P. ureae by high resolution, twodimensional protein electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 8:532–535
    [Google Scholar]
20. Potts T. V., Zambon J. J., Genco R. J. 1985; Reassignment of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to the genus Haemophilus as Haemophilus actinomycetemcomitans comb.nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 35:337–341
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sørensen B., Falk E. S., Wisløff-Nilsen E., Bjorvatn B., Kristiansen B. E. 1985; Multivariate analysis of Neisseria DNA restriction endonuclease restriction patterns. Journal of General Microbiology 131:3099–3104
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tanner A.C.R., Visconti R. A., Socransky S. S., Holt S. C. 1982; Classification and identification of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Haemophilus aphrophilus by cluster analysis and deoxyribonucleic acid hybridizations. Journal of Periodontal Research 17:585–596
    [Google Scholar]
23. Topliss J. G., Edwards R. P. 1979; Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure activity relationships. Journal of Medical Chemistry 22:1238–1244
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wold S. 1976; Pattern recognition by means of disjoint principal components models. Pattern Recognition 8:127–139
    [Google Scholar]
25. Wold S. 1978; Cross-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and principal components models. Technometrics 20:397–405
    [Google Scholar]
26. Wold S., Esbensen K., Geladi P. 1987 Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2:37–52
    [Google Scholar]
27. Wold S., Albano C., Dunn W. J. III Esbensen K., Hellberg S., Johanson E., Sjöström M. 1983; Pattern recognition: finding and using regularities in multivariate data. In Food Research and Data Analysis, pp 147–188 Martens H., Russwurm H. Edited by London & New York: Applied Sciences Publishers;
    [Google Scholar]