Strains of Pseudomonas avenae Manns 1909 and Pseudomonas rubrilineans (Lee et al., 1925) Stapp 1928 were compared using physiological, biochemical and serological tests together with an examination of plant host range. Minor differences were found between the physiological and biochemical characteristics of the two pathogens, while no differences were detected in pathogenicity, host range, cellular protein profiles, direct fluorescent straining, and dot-immunobinding assays. P. avenae and P. rubrilineans were distinctly different from other non-fluorescent pseudomonads. We were unable to differentiate P. avenae strains from those of P. rubrilineans, and we propose that they be regarded as a single species, retaining the name Pseudomonas avenae.
AllanE., KelmanA.1977; Immunofluorescent stain procedures for detection and identification of Erwiniacarotovora var. atroseptica. Phytopathology 67:1305–1312
CarlsonR.R., VidaverA.K.1982; Taxonomy of Corynebacterium plant pathogens, including a new pathogen of wheat, based on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of cellular proteins. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 32:315–326
De VosP., GoorM., GillisM., De LeyJ.1985; Ribosome ribonucleic acid cistron similarities of phytopathogenicPseudomonas species. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 35:169–184
HaleC.N., WilkieJ.P.1972; Bacterial leaf stripe of sorghum in New Zealand caused by Pseudomonas rubrisubalbicans. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 15:457–460
HaywardA.C.1962; Studies on bacterial pathogens of sugarcane II. Differentiation, taxonomy and nomenclature of the bacteria causing red stripe and mottled stripe diseases. Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute. Occasional Paper 13:13–27
HaywardA.C.1983; Pseudomonas: the non-fluorescent pseudomonads. In Plant Bacterial Diseases. A Diagnostic Guide pp 110–111FahyP.C., PersleyG.J. Edited by New York: Academic Press;
HughR., LeifsonE.1953; The taxonomic significance of fermentative versus oxidative metabolism of carbohydrates by various gram negative bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 66:24–26
LapageS.P., SneathP.H.A., LesselE.F., SkermanV.B.D., SeeligerH.P.R., ClarkW.A.editors editor International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria, 1976 Revision. Washington, DC:: American Society for Microbiology;
LeachJ.E., RamundoB.A., PearsonD.L., ClaflinL.E.1987; Dot-immunobinding assay for detection of Xanthomonascampestrispv.holcicola in sorghum. Plant Disease 71:30–33
MoffettM.L., HaywardA.C., FahyP.C.1986; Five new hosts of Pseudomonas andropogonis occurring in Eastern Australia: host range and characterization of isolates. Plant Pathology 35:344–43
QhobelaM., ClaflinL.E.1988; Characterization of Xanthomonascampestrispv.pennamericanumpv.nov., causal agent of bacterial leaf streak of pearl millet. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 38:362–366
SchaadN.W., KadoC.I., SumnerD.R.1975; Synonymy of Pseudomonas avenaeManns 1905 and Pseudomonas alboprecipitansRosen 1922. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 25:133–137
SierraG.1957; A simple method for the detection of lipolytic activity of microorganisms and some observations on the influence of the contact between cells and fatty substrates. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 23:15–22
StappC.1928; Schizomycetes (SpaltpilzeoderBakterien). In Handbuch der Pflanzenkrankheiten, 5th edn.. 2: pp 1–295SorauerP. Edited by Berlin: Paul Parey;
TakikawaM., ShimaokaM.1988; Grouping of phytopathogenic pseudomonads based on the analyses of quinones and fatty acids, (abstract).5th International Congress of Plant Pathology,. p. 1–4 84:
ThornleyM.J.1960; The differentiation of Pseudomonas from other Gram negative bacteria on the basis of arginine metabolism. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 23:37–52
VidaverA.K.1967; Synthetic and complex media for the rapid detection of fluorescence of phytopathogenic pseudomonads: effect of the carbon source. Applied Microbiology 15:1523–1524