1887

Abstract

A distributed Microbial Information Network Europe (MINE) is being constructed by a number of major microbial culture collections in countries of the European Community, with the support of the Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP) of the Commission of the European Community. The representatives of the collections participating in MINE have agreed to adopt a general format for the computer storage and retrieval of strain data. This uniform format will facilitate the electronic combination and exchange of data from different collections in order to produce integrated catalogues and the use of identical commands to search the different databases. It is recommended to other collections who may wish to contribute data to the MINE network or between themselves.

Three kinds of records can be linked to the leading species records: strain records, synonym records, and alternative morphonym records. A minimum data set of 30 fields (similar to the fields used for producing catalogues) is defined that facilitates the exchange of data between the national nodes and serves as a directory to strains available at other nodes. It is suggested that the full strain record comprise 99 fields, grouped in 12 blocks: internal administration - name - strain administration - status - environment and history - biological interactions - sexuality - properties (cytology, biomolecular data) - genotype and genetics - growth conditions - chemistry and enzymes - practical applications. Several fields are divided into subfields of different ranks. Delimiters are used either to separate a range of entries that have to be indexed or to divide an entry from the reference to its source or remarks that should not be indexed. The contents and structure of the fields proposed for filamentous fungi and yeasts are described and in some cases illustrated by examples. Uniformity of input is essential for indexed fields and desirable for non-indexed fields. Seven thesaurus files are envisaged to ensure consistency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-134-6-1667
1988-06-01
2021-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/134/6/mic-134-6-1667.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-134-6-1667&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anderson T.-H., Bodenstein J., Domsch K. H. 1976; A partially computerized documentation system for microscopic soil fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany 54:1709–1713
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anonymous. 1983 Microbiological Resource Databank, MIRDAB Workshop 24 May 1983, Brussels. Report of the European Communities. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Exerpta Medica;
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boidin J. 1964; Valeur des caractères culturaux et cytologiques pour la taxonomie des Thelephoraceae résupinés et etales-reflechis (Basidiomycètes). Bulletin de la Société botanique de France 111309–315
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bridge P. D., Hawksworth D. L. 1984; The API ZYM enzyme testing system as an aid to the rapid identification of Penicillium isolates. Microbiological Sciences 1232–234
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryant T. N. 1983; A microcomputer-based information storage and retrieval system for the maintenance of records for a culture collection. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 54101–107
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Centraalbureau Voor Schimmelcultures 1987 List of Cultures Baam: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures;
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dermoumi H. 1979; Differentiation of yeast-like fungi isolated from clinical specimens with the API 20 C auxanogram. Ôrztliches Laboratorium 25:289–291
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Domsch K. H., Gams W., Anderson T.-H. 1980 Compendium of Soil Fungi London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Environmental Resources Ltd 1984 EEC Information System for Microorganisms Report prepared for the Commission of the European Communities;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Enzyme Nomenclature 1984; Recommendations (1984) of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry. Orlando; Academic Press:
  11. Hawksworth D. L. 1980; Recommended abbreviations for the names of some commonly cited authors of fungi. Review of Plant Pathology 59:473–480
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hawksworth D. L., Kirsop B. E. editors 1988 Living Resources for Biotechnology: Filamentous Fungi Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hawksworth D. L., Sutton B. C., Ainsworth G. C. 1983 Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, 7th edn.. Kew: Commonwealth Mycological Institute;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mcgowan V. F., Skerman V. B. D. editors 1982 World Directory of Collections of Cultures of Microorganisms, 2nd edn.. Brisbane: University of Queensland. Issued by World Data Center of Microorganisms;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Merck. 1987/88 Reagenzien, Diagnostica, Chemikalien Darmstadt: E. Merck AG;
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pridham T. G. 1981; Microorganisms culture collections: acronyms and abbreviations. Agricultural Reviews and Manuals ARM-NC-14. Peoria: US Department of Agriculture;
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Northolt M. D., Verhulsdonk C. A. H., Soentoro P. S. S., Paulsch W. E. 1976; Effect of water activity and temperature on aflatoxin production by Aspergillus parasiticus. Journal of Milk and Food Technology 39:170–174
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rogosa M., Krichevsky M. I., Colwell R. R. 1986; Coding Microbiological Data for Computers. New York: Springer;
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wasfy E. H., Bridge P. D., Brayford D. 1987; Preliminary studies on the use of biochemical and physiological tests for the characterization of Fusarium isolates. Mycopathologia 99:9–13
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-134-6-1667
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-134-6-1667
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error