Chemotaxis of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli RP8002 towards a range of carbohydrates, phenolic compounds and flavonoids was assayed. Xylose (peak response 10−4M), sucrose (peak response 10−6M) and raffinose (peak response 10−5M) were strong chemoattractants amongst the carbohydrates, whilst glucose, fructose, galactose and maltose produced little or no detectable response. Of the monocyclic phenolic compounds, vanillyl alcohol, p-hydroxybenzoic acid (both peak responses 10−6M) and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (peak response 10−4M) all evoked strong chemotactic responses. Amongst the nod-inducing flavonoids, apigenin and luteolin were both strong chemoattractants (peaks at 10−5M) while naringenin produced a very low response. Competition experiments suggest that apigenin and luteolin are recognized by a common receptor, but that there exists a separate receptor for luteolin alone. The inhibitors of nod-induction, umbelliferone and acetosyringone, both produced strong chemotactic responses, with peaks at 10−3M and 10−2M respectively. This evidence is indicative of a role for chemotaxis towards nod-inducing flavonoids in the initiation of root nodule formation by rhizobia, and also suggests that chemotaxis may influence the host range of the interaction.
AdlerJ.1973; A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli
. Journal of General Microbiology 74:77–91
AmesP.,
BergmanK.1980; Competitive advantage provided by bacterial motility in the formation of nodules by Rhizobium meliloti
. Journal of Bacteriology 148:728–729
AshbyA. M.,
WatsonM. D.,
ShawC. H.1987; A Ti-plasmid determined function is responsible for chemotaxis towards the plant wound product acetosyringone. FEMS Microbiology Letters 41:189–192
AshbyA. M.,
WatsonM. D.,
LoakeG. J.,
ShawC. H.1988; Ti-plasmid specified chemotaxis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58C1 towards wr-induc- ing phenolics and soluble factors from mono- cotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. Journal of Bacteriology (in the Press)
Caetano-AnollesG.,
Crist-EstesD. K.,
BauerW. D.1988; Chemotaxis of Rhizobium meliloti to the plant flavone luteolin requires functional nodula- tion genes. Journal of Bacteriology (in the Press)
DjordjevicM. A.,
RedmondJ. A.,
BatleyM.,
RolfeB. G.1987; Clovers secrete specific phenolic compounds which either stimulate or repress nod gene expression in Rhizobium trifolii
. EMBO Journal 6:1173–1179
FirminJ. L.,
WilsonK. E.,
RossenL.,
JohnstonA. W. B.1986; Flavonoid activation of nodulation genes in Rhizobium reversed by other compounds present in plants. Nature; London: 32490–92
GaworzewskaE. T.,
CarlileM. J.1982; Positive chemotaxis of Rhizobium leguminosarum and other bacteria towards root exudates from legumes and other plants. Journal of General Microbiology 128:1179–1188
GulashM.,
AmesP.,
LarosiliereR. C.,
BergmanK.1984; Rhizobia are attracted to localised sites on legume roots. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 48:149–152
GötzR.,
LimmerN.,
OberK.,
SchmittR.1982; Motility and chemotaxis in two strains of Rhizobium with complex flagella. Journal of General Microbiology 128:789–798
HorvathB.,
BachemC. W. B.,
SchellJ.,
KondorosiA.1987; Host-specific regulation of nodulating genes in Rhizobium is mediated by a plant signal, interacting with the nodD gene product. EMBO Journal 6:841–848
KosslakR. M.,
BooklandR.,
BarkeiJ.,
PaarenH. E.,
AppelbaumE. R.1987; Induction of Bradyrhizobium japonicum common nod genes by isoflavones isolated from Glycine max
. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84:7428–7432
LoakeG. J.,
AshbyA. M.,
ShawC. H.1988; Attraction of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58C1 towards sugars involves a highly sensitive chemotaxis system. Journal of General Microbiology 134:1427–1432
NesterE. W.,
GordonM. P.,
AmasinoR. M.,
YanofskyM.1984; Crown gall: a molecular and physiological analysis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35:387–413
OkkerR. J. H.,
SpainkH.,
HilleJ.,
VanbrusselT. A. N.,
LugtenbergB.1984; Plant inducible promoter of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid. Nature; London: 312564–566
RedmondJ. W.,
BatleyM.,
DjordjevicM. A.,
InnesR. W.,
KuempelP. L.,
RolfeB. G.1986; Flavones induce expression of nodulation genes in Rhizobium
. Nature; London: 323632–635
RogowskyP. M.,
CloseT. J.,
ChimeraJ. A.,
ShawJ. J.,
KadoC. I.1987; Regulation of the vir genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens plasmid pTiC58. Journal of Bacteriology 169:5101–5112
RossenL.,
DavisE. O.,
JohnstonA. W. B.1987; Plant-induced expression of Rhizobium genes involved in host specificity and early stages of nodulation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 12:430–433
ShawC. H.,
AshbyA. M.,
BrownA.,
RoyalC.,
LoakeG. J.,
ShawC. H.1988; vir A andG are the Ti-plasmid functions required for chemotaxis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens towards acetosyringone. Molecular Microbiology 2:413–418
StachelS. E.,
MessensE.,
Van MontaguM.,
ZambryskiP.1985; Identification of the signal molecules produced by wounded plant cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens
. Nature; London: 318624–629
StachelS. E.,
NesterE. W.,
ZambryskiP. C.1986; A plant cell factor induces Agrobacterium tumefaciens vir gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 83:379–383
WINANSS. C.,
EBERTP. R.,
STACHELS. E.,
GORDONM. P.,
NESTERE. W.1986; A gene essential for Agrobacterium virulence is homologous to a family of positive regulatory loci. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 83:8278–8282
ZaatS. A. J.,
WijffelmanC. A.,
SpainkH. P.,
VanbrusselA. A. N.,
OkkerR. J. H.,
LugtenbergB. J. J.1987; Induction of the nodA promoter of Rhizobium leguminosarum sym plasmid pRLIJI by plant flavanones and flavones. Journal of Bacteriology 169:198–204