1887

Abstract

Three proteinase isoenzymes from one benign strain of and five proteinase isoenzymes from each of two virulent strains of were purified by horizontal slab polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The purified isoenzymes hydrolysed casein, collagen I, collagen III, elastin, a-elastin, fibrinogen, gelatin, haemoglobin and a-keratin. The pH optima of all the isoenzymes lay between 7.25 and 9.5, the range of 8.75–9.25 being common to all. The isoenzymes were inhibited by phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, diphenylcarbamyl chloride, -(l-tosylamide-2-phenyl)ethyl chloromethyl ketone, EGTA and EDTA, indicating that they were chymotrypsin-like serine proteinases that require a metal ion for stability or activity. EDTA inhibition was not reversed by addition of Ca or Mg. Some isoenzymes were activated by Mg, Ca, Cr and Se and all were inhibited by Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Cd and Hg. Isoenzymes from benign strains had a lower temperature stability, losing all activity at 55 °C, whereas those from virulent strains lost all activity at 60 °C.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-131-11-2871
1985-11-01
2021-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/131/11/mic-131-11-2871.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-131-11-2871&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Beveridge W. I. B. 1941; Footrot in sheep: a transmissible disease due to infection with Fusiformis nodosus (n. sp.). . Bulletin, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia No. 140:1–64
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bohlen J. B., Stein S., Dairman W., Udenfriend S. 1973; Fluorometic assay of proteins in the nanogram range. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 155:213–220
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Broad T. E., Skerman T. M. 1976; Partial purification and properties of extracellular proteolytic activity of Bacteroides nodosus.. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 19:317–322
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Conover W. J. 1980; Practical Nonparametric Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons;, 2nd.299–305
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Depiazzi L. J., Richards R. B. 1979; A degrading proteinase test to distinguish benign and virulent ovine isolates of Bacteroides nodosus. Australian Veterinary Journal 55:25–28
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Egerton J. R., Laing E. A. 1978/1979; Characteristics of Bacteroides nodosus isolated from cattle.. Veterinary MicrOblology 3:269–279
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Egerton J. R., Parsonson I. M. 1969; Benign foot-rot - a specific interdigital dermatitis of sheep associated with infection by less proteolytic strains of Fusiformis nodosus.. Australian Veterinary Journal 45:345–349
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Every D. 1981; Quantitative measurement of protease activities in slab polyacrylamide gel electro-phoretograms.. Analytical Biochemistry 116:519–523
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Every D. 1982; Proteinase isoenzyme patterns of Bacteroides nodosus: distinction between ovine virulent isolates, ovine benign isolates and bovine isolates.. Journal of General MicrOblology 128:809–812
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Every D., Green R. S. 1982; Purification of individual proteinase isozymes from Bacteroides nodosus by use of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, a fluorogenic substrate detection system and a simple electroelution apparatus. Analytical Biochemistry 119:82–85
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Green R. S. 1984; A method to differentiate between virulent and benign isolates of Bacteroides nodosus based on the thermal stability of their extracellular proteinases.. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 33:11–13
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kortt A. A., O’Donnell I. J., Stewart D. J., Clark B. L. 1982; Activities and partial purification of extracellular proteases of Bacteroides nodosus from virulent and benign footrot.. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 35:481–489
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Partridge S. M., Davis H. F., Adair G. S. 1955; The chemistry of connective tissues 2. Soluble proteins derived from partial hydrolysis of elastin.. Biochemical Journal 61:11–21
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Piez K. A., Eigner E. A., Lewis M. S. 1963; The chromatographic separation and amino acid composition of the subunits of several collagens.. Biochemistry 2:58–66
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pras M., Glynn L. E. 1973; Isolation of a noncollagenous reticulin component and its primary characterization.. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 54:449–456
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Richards R. B., Depiazzi L. J., Edwards J. R., Wilkinson F. C. 1980; Isolation and characterisation of Bacteroides nodosus from foot lesions of cattle in Western Australia.. Australian Veterinary Journal 56:517–521
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rinderknecht H., Geokas M. C., Silverman P., Haverback B. J. 1968; A new ultrasensitive method for the determination of proteolytic activity.. Clinica chimica acta 21:197–203
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schumacher G. F. B., Schill W.-B. 1972; Radial diffusion in gel for microdetermination of enzymes. II. Plasminogen activator, elastase, and non-specific proteases.. Analytical Biochemistry 48:9–26
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Skerman T. M. 1975; Determination of some in vitro growth requirements of Bacteroides nodosus. . Journal of General MicrOblology 87:107–119
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Steinert P. M., Idler W. W., Poirier M. C., Katoh Y., Stoner G. D., Yuspa S. H. 1979: Subunit structure of the mouse epidermal keratin filament.. Biochimica et biophysica acta 577:11–21
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stewart D. J. 1979; The role of elastase in the differentiation of Bacteroides nodosus infections in sheep and cattle.. Research in Veterinary Science 27:99–105
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomas J. H. 1962; The bacteriology and histopathology of footrot in sheep.. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13:725–733
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Thomas J. H. 1963; A liquid medium for the growth of Fusiformis nodosus.. Australian Veterinary Journal 39:434–437
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Thomas J. H. 1964; The pathogenesis of footrot in sheep with reference to proteases of Fusiformis nodosus.. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15:1001–1016
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-131-11-2871
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-131-11-2871
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error