Five different assay conditions were used to analyse the intracellular proteolytic system of Tetrahymena pyriformis GL. Acid proteinase activity was measured using hide powder azure at pH4 and neutral proteinase activity was measured using hide powder azure and azocasein at pH 8 and two peptide nitroanilides at pH 7. Differences between the activities were apparent from their sensitivity to proteinase inhibitors although all were likely to be due to cysteine proteinases. Indeed all were enhanced by the presence of 1 mm-DTT. The neutral activities could be resolved into at least three forms by ion-exchange chromatography, each form having a different specificity for the substrates used. The acid proteinase activity was similarly separated into different fractions. The intracellular activity of acid proteinase responded differently from that of the neutral activities to culture age or resuspension of cells in fresh medium and starvation buffer. Furthermore, analysis on sucrose density gradients showed that although the neutral activities had a similar subcellular distribution to one another this differed from that of the acid proteinase activity. This suggests that the physiological roles of the acid and neutral proteinases may differ. PAGE using gels containing haemoglobin to detect proteinases was less successful than with other species of protozoa. However, it did reveal multiple forms of acid proteinase.
BannoY., YanoK., NozawaY.1982; Biochemical characterization of secreted proteases during growth in Tetrahymena pyriformis WH-14: comparison of extracellular with intracellular proteases. Journal of Protozoology 29:91–98
BannoY., YanoK., NozawaY.1983; Purification and characterization of a secreted protease from Tetrahymena pyriformis. European Journal of Biochemistry 132:563–568
BlumJ. J.1975; Effects of metabolites present during growth of Tetrahymena pyriformis on the subsequent secretion of lysosomal hydrolases. Journal of Cellular Physiology 86:131–142
BlumJ. J.1976; Lysosomal hydrolase secretion by Tetrahymena: a comparison of several intralysosomal enzymes with the isoenzymes released into the medium. Journal of Cellular Physiology 89:457–472
BlumJ. J., RothsteinT. L.1975; Lysosomes in Tetrahymena. In Lysosomes in Biology and Pathology4 pp. 33–45DingleJ. T., DeanR. T. Edited by Amsterdam :: North-Holland.;
DickieN., LienerI. E.1962; A study of the proteolytic system of Tetrahymena pyriformis W. I. Purification and partial characterization of the constituent proteinases. Biochimica et biophysica acta 64:41–51
LevyM. R., SisskinE. E., McconkeyC. L.1976; A protease that increases during a period of enzymic and metabolic adjustment in Tetrahymena. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 172:634–647
LloydD., BrightwellR., VenablesS. E., RoachG. I., TurnerG.1971; Subcellular fractionation of Tetrahymena pyriformis ST by zonal centrifugation: changes in activities and distribution of enzymes during the growth cycle and on starvation. Journal of General Microbiology 65:209–223
MüllerM., BaudhuinP., De DuveC.1966; Lysosomes in Tetrahymena pyriformis I.Some properties and lysosomal localization of acid hydrolases. Journal of Cellular Physiology 68:165–176
NorthM. J., CoombsG. H.1981; Proteinases of Leishmania mexicanaamastigotes and promastigotes: analysis by gel electrophoresis. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 3:293–300
NorthM. J., WhyteA.1984; Purification and characterization of two acid proteinases from Dictyostelium discoideum. Journal of General Microbiology 130:123–134
NorthM. J., CoombsG. H., BarryJ. D.1983; A comparative study of the proteolytic enzymes of Trypanosomabrucei, T. equiperdum, T. evansi, T. vivax, Leishmaniatarentolae and Crithidia fasciculata. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 9:161–180
SedmakJ. J., GrossbergS. E.1977; A rapid, sensitive and versatile assay for protein using Coomassie brilliant blue G250. Analytical Biochemistry 79:544–552
SuprynowiczF. A., AllewellN. M.1979; Regulation of neutral protease activity through the life cycle of Tetrahymena pyriformis. Biochimica et biophysica acta 585:488–498