1887

Abstract

The duration of a morphological phase of the cell cycle is reflected in the steady state distribution of the sizes of cells in that phase. Relationships presented here provide a method for estimating the timing and variability of any cell cycle phase. It is shown that the mean size of cells initiating and finishing any phase can be estimated from (1) the frequency of cells exhibiting the distinguishing morphological or autoradiographic features of the phase; (2) the mean size of cells in the phase; and (3) their coefficient of variation. The calculations are based on a submodel of the Koch-Schaechter Growth Controlled Model which assumes that (i) the distribution of division sizes is Gaussian; (ii) there is no correlation in division sizes between successive generations; and (iii) every cell division gives rise to two daughter cells of equal size. The calculations should be useful for a wider range of models, however, because the extrapolation factors are not sensitive to the chosen model. Criteria are proposed to allow the user to check the method's applicability for any experimental case.

The method also provides a more efficient test of the dependence of growth on cell size than does the Collins-Richmond method. This is because the method uses the mean and coefficient of variation of the size of the total population, in conjunction with those of the cells in a final phase of the cell cycle, to test potential growth laws. For populations studied by electron microscopy, an exponential growth model provided much better agreement than did a linear growth model.

The computer simulations were used to generate rules for three types of cell phases: those that end at cell division, those that start at cell division, and those totally contained within a single cell cycle. For the last type, additional criteria are proposed to establish if the phase is well enough contained for the formulae and graphs to be used. The most useful rule emerging from these computer studies is that the fraction of the cell cycle time occupied by a phase is the product of the frequency of the phase and the ratio of the mean size of cells in that phase to the mean size of all cells in the population.

A further advantage of the techniques presented here is that they use the extant distributions that were actually measured, and not hypothesized distributions nor the special distributions needed for the Collins-Richmond method that can only be calculated from the observed distributions of dividing or newborn cells on the basis of an assumed growth law.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-128-12-2877
1982-12-01
2021-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/128/12/mic-128-12-2877.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-128-12-2877&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Collins J. F., Richmond M. H. 1962; Rate of growth of Bacillus cereus between divisions. Journal of General Microbiology 28:15–33
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper S., Helmstetter C. E. 1968; Chromosome replication and the division cycle of Escherichia coli B/r. Journal of Molecular Biology 31:519–540
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cullum J., Vincente M. 1978; Cell growth and length distribution in Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology 134:330–337
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Donachie W. D. 1968; Relationship between cell size and the time of initiation of DNA replication. Nature; London: 2191077–1079
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Harvey R. J., Marr A. G., Painter P. R. 1967; Kinetics of growth of individual cells of Escherichia coli and Azotobacter agilis. Journal of Bacteriology 93:605–617
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Koch A. L. 1966; Distribution of cell size in growing cultures of bacteria and the applicability of the Collins-Richmond principle. Journal of General Microbiology 45:409–417
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Koch A. L. 1977; Does the initiation of chromosome replication regulate cell division?. Advances in Microbial Physiology 16:49–98
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Koch A. L. 1980; Does the variability of the cell cycle result from one or many chance events?. Nature; London: 28680–82
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Koch A. L., Blumberg G. 1976; Distribution of bacteria in the velocity gradient centrifuge. Biophysical Journal 16:389–405
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Koch A. L., Schaechter M. 1962; A model for the statistics of the cell division process. Journal of General Microbiology 29:435–454
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Koppes L. J. H., Woldringh C. L., Nanninga N. 1978; Size variation and correlation of different cell cycle events in slow-growing Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology 134:423–433
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kubitschek H. E. 1970; Evidence for the generality of linear cell growth. Journal of Theoretical Biology 28:15–29
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kubitschek H. E. 1981; Bilinear cell growth of Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology 148:730–733
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Painter P. R., Marr A. G. 1968; Mathematics of microbial populations. Annual Review of Microbiology 22:519–548
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Powell E. O. 1964; A note on Koch & Schaechter’s hypothesis about growth and fission of bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 37:231–249
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rahn O. 1931–1932; A chemical explanation of the variability of growth rate. Journal of General Physiology 15:257–277
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schaechter M., Williamson J. P., Hood J. R., Koch A. L. 1962; Growth, cell and nuclear division in some bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 29:421–454
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sokal R. R., Rohlf F. J. 1969 Biometry San Francisco: W. H. Freeman;
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stubblefield E. 1981; Cell cycle. In Advanced Cell Biology pp. 1005–1025 Schwartz L. M., Azar M. M. Edited by New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold;
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Trueba F. J. 1982; On the precision and accuracy achieved by Escherichia coli cells at fission about their middle. Archives of Microbiology 131:55–59
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Woldringh C. L., Dejong N. A., Van Den Berg W., Koppes L. J. H. 1977; Morphological analysis of the division cycle of two Escherichia coli substrains during slow growth. Journal of Bacteriology 131:270–279
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zusman D., Gottlieb P., Rosenberg E. 1971; Division cycle of Myxococcus xanthus. III. Kinetics of cell growth and protein synthesis. Journal of Bacteriology 105:811–819
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-128-12-2877
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-128-12-2877
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error