Nuclear Segregation and the Growth of Clones of Spontaneous Mutants of Bacteria Free

Abstract

Summary: An investigation of the rate of increase of spontaneous mutants and the subsequent increase in mutant proportion in a bacterial culture revealed discrepancies between the observed results and those expected on the assumption that mutant and parent grew with equal rates. These discrepancies could not be accounted for in terms of a selective difference between established mutants and their parents since, when the two were mixed together in reconstruction experiments, they fared equally well for hundreds of generations. Rather the discrepancies indicated a difference between parents and mutants. The data were consistent with the hypothesis that the mutation occurred independently among one of four mutable units (nuclei) and that the mutant nucleus was dominant over its sister non-mutant nuclei in the heterocaryon so formed. As a consequence, a delay of two generations ensued before the mutant unit segregated into the homocaryotic ancestor of a mutant clone. This process delayed the onset of an increase in mutant numbers after mutation. The accurate prediction of the pseudo-equilibrium level of mutants, based on verifiable assumptions of periodic selection, mutation and segregation lag, is added evidence for the occurrence of a two-generation delay before the increase of the mutant clone. This phenomenon, called segregation lag, is a source of error in the calculation of mutation rate by methods involving the numbers of mutants found in bacterial cultures. Furthermore, because bacteria may be multinucleate, the rate of mutation/bacterium/generation is not the same as the rate of mutation mutable unit (nucleus)/generation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-11-3-364
1954-12-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/11/3/mic-11-3-364.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-11-3-364&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Armitage P. 1953; Statistical concepts in the theory of bacterial mutation. J. Hyg., Camb. 51:162
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atwood K.C., Schneider L.K., Ryan F.J. 1951; Periodic selection in Escherichia coli. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. 37:146
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavalli L.L., Lederberg J., Lederberg E.M. 1953; An infective factor controlling sex compatibility in Bacterium coli. J. gen. Microbiol. 8:89
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis B.D. 1950; Studies on nutritionally deficient bacterial mutants isolated by means of penicillin. Experientia 6:41
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaplan R. 1947; Spontane Mutabilität bei Bacterium prodigiosum. Z. Naturf. 2b:308
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kendall D.G. 1953; Stochastic processes and the growth of bacterial cultures. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 7:55
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lea D.E., Coulson C.A. 1949; The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49:264
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lederberg J. 1949; Aberrant heterozygotes in Escherichia coli. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. 35:178
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lederberg J., Lederberg E.M. 1952; Replica plating and indirect selection of bacterial mutants. J. Bact. 63:399
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lieb M. 1951; Forward and reverse mutation in a histidine-requiring strain of Escherichia coli. Genetics 36:460
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Newcombe H.B. 1948; Delayed expression of spontaneous mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetics 33:447
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Robinow C.F. 1945; Nuclear apparatus and cell structure in rod-shaped bacteria. Addendum in Dubos, R. J. The Bacterial Cell Cambridge, Mass.:: Harvard University Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ryan F.J. 1954; The delayed appearance of mutants in bacterial cultures. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. 40:178
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ryan F.J., Schneider L.K. 1948; The consequences of mutation during the growth of biochemical mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bact. 56:699
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ryan F.J., Schneider L.K. 1949; Mutations during the growth of biochemical mutants of Escherichia coli. Genetics 34:72
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ryan F.J., Fried P., Schwartz M. 1954; Nuclear segregation and the growth of clones of bacterial mutants induced by ultraviolet light. J. gen. Microbiol 11:380
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stocker B.A.D. 1949; Measurements of the rate of mutation of flagellar antigenic phase in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Hyg., Camb. 47:398
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Within E. 1951; Nuclear segregation and the delayed appearance of induced mutants in Escherichia coli. Cold Spr. Harb. Sym. quant. Biol. 16:357
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Witkin E., Kennedy F.L. 1951; A suppressor mutation in Escherichia coli . Amer. Nat. 85:141
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-11-3-364
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-11-3-364
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed