1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Further experimental evidence is described to support the concept that bacterial viruses exert a controlling effect on bacterial variation and evolution. A number of strains of diphtheria bacilli, both mitis and gravis, have been found to be carrying viruses capable of converting a susceptible avirulent diphtheria strain to full virulence and toxigenicity. The virus-resistant strains thus converted to virulence retain this property when subcultured and the change can be effected as well as The mechanism of virulence transfer has been investigated, and it appears that this virus-controlled conversion to virulence cannot be explained on the basis of the selection of virulent mutants already present in the avirulent culture. Also Iysogenicity in a diphtheria strain does not itself imply virulence, since some viruses which attack the avirulent strain give rise to resistant cultures which are lysogenic and carry the infecting virus but they remain avirulent and non-toxigenic. It remains possible that the infecting virus transfers genetic properties such as virulence from the original virulent host bacterium to the infected strain. Selection by the infecting virus is also involved, and when a bacterial strain becomes infected with a mixture of viruses one of these becomes dominant in any definite cultural condition, infects all the cells in the culture and thus produces a ‘homogenizing’ effect. When precautions are taken to limit this spread of virus throughout the bacterial population it is found that ordinary laboratory cultures of ‘pure’ bacterial strains contain variant bacteria with distinctive properties. These when isolated are found to be infected with mutant viruses. The origin of the virus affects its virulence-conveying property; for example, virulence has not yet been transferred by a virus originating from an avirulent strain. On the other hand, some viruses carried by virulent diphtheria strains have been found to be incapable of conveying virulence, although they are able to render the avirulent culture lysogenic. Not only the origin but also the subsequent history of a virus affects its virulence-conveying power. One virus preparation was found to retain its virulence-conveying ability indefinitely when propagated on the avirulent strain, whilst after one passage through a susceptible virulent strain the ability was lost.

Interpretations of the phenomena associated with lysogenicity are complicated by the frequent occurrence of bacteria simultaneously infected with several distinct viruses and by the possibility of hybridization effected by genetic recombination.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-11-2-272
1954-10-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/11/2/mic-11-2-272.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-11-2-272&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexander H. E., Leidy G. 1951; Determination of inherited traits of H. influenzae by desoxyribonucleic acid fractions isolated from type-specific cells. J. exp. Med 93:345
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austrian R., Macleod C. M. 1949; Acquisition of M. protein through trans-formation reactions. J. exp. Med 89:451
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Avery O. T., Macleod C. M., McCarty M. 1944; Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal type. J. exp. Med 79:137
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barksdale W. L., Pappenheimer A. M. Jun 1954; Phage host relationship in toxigenic and non-toxigenic diphtheria bacilli. J. Bact 67:220
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blair J. E. 1924; A lytic principle (bacteriophage) for Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J. infect. Dis 35:401
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boivin A., Vendrely R., Lehoult Y. 1945; L’acide thymonucléique polymerisé, principe paraissant susceptible de determiner la spécificité sérologique et l’équipement enzymatique des bactéries. Signification pour la biochimie de l’heredité. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris 139:1047
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Botez A. 1921; La bactériolyse en série par le violet de méthyle. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris 85:585
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyd J. S. K. 1949; Development of bacteriophage in Escherichia coli B. Nature; Lond: 164874
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Elek S. D. 1948; The recognition of toxigenic bacterial strains in vitro. Brit. med. J i:493
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fahey J. F. 1952; Preliminary observations on phage typing of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Canad. publ. Hlth J 43:167
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fejgin B. 1925; Sur le principle lytique anti-diphthérique. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris 93:365
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Freeman Y. J., Morse I. U. 1952; Further observations on the change to virulence of bacteriophage-infected avirulent strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J. Bact 63:407
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Groman N. B. 1953; Evidence for the induced nature of the change from non-toxigenicity to toxigenicity in Corynebacterium diphtheriae as a result of exposure to specific bacteriophage. J. Bact 66:184
    [Google Scholar]
  14. D’Hérelle F. 1918; Technique de la recherche du microbe filtrant bactériophage (Bacteriophagum intestinale). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris 81:1160
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hewitt L. F. 1947; Serological typing of C. diphtheriae. Brit. J. exp. Path 28:338
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hewitt L. F. 1948; Virulence and toxigenicity of different serological types of C. diphtheriae. Brit. J. exp. Path 29:181
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hewitt L. F. 1952; Diphtheria bacteriophages and their relation to the development of bacterial variants. J. gen. Microbiol 7:362
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hewitt L. F. 1953; Influence of bacteriophage on bacterial variation and evolution. In Adaptation in Micro-organisms. Symp. Soc. gen. Microbiol 3:276
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hewitt L. F. 1954; Autoadaptation of bacterial viruses and its effect on bacterial variation and evolution. J. gen. Microbiol 11:261
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hotchkiss R. D. 1951; Transfer of penicillin resistance in pneumococci by the desoxyribonucleate derived from resistant cultures. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol 16:457
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Keogh E. V., Simmons R. T., Anderson G. 1938; Type-specific bacteriophages for Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J. Path. Bact 46:565
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Klosterman J. A., Small K. W. 1928; Recent studies on methods of isolating a bacteriophage for Bacillus diphtheriae. J. exp. Med 47:121
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ouchterlony O. 1949; Antigen-antibody reactions in gels. Acta path, microbiol. scand 26:507
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Parsons E. I., Frobisher M. Jun 1951; Effect of bacteriophage on virulence of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y 78:746
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pope C. G., Stevens M. F., Caspary E. A., Fenton E. L. 1951; Some new observations on diphtheria toxin and antitoxin. Brit. J. exp. Path 32:246
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith G. H., Jordan E. F. 1931; Bacillus diphtheriae in its relation to bacteriophage. J. Bact 21:75
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Stocker B. A. D., Zinder N. D., Lederberg J. 1953; Transduction of flagel-lar characters in Salmonella. J. gen. Microbiol 9:410
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stone F. M., Hobby G. L. 1934; A coccoid form of C. diptheriae susceptible to bacteriophage. J. Bact 27:403
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tatum E. L., Lederberg J. 1947; Gene recombination in the bacterium Escherichia coli. J. Bact 53:673
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Thibaut J., Fredericq P. 1952; Libération de bactériophage par des souches lysogènes de C. diphtheriae sous l’effet des rayons ultraviolets. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 146:1627
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Toshach S. 1950; Bacteriophages for C. diphtheriae. Canad. publ. Hlth J 41:332
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zinder N. D., Lederberg J. 1952; Genetic exchange in Salmonella. J. Bact 64:679
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-11-2-272
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-11-2-272
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error