1887

Abstract

Physiological tests were devised and used to compare 15 strains representing five species of soil and freshwater amoebae assigned to the genus . The tests gave an acceptable level of reliability and the pattern of responses was not affected by the differing growth rates of the organisms. There was some degree of overlap between the strains, as shown by the high level of inter-species similarities in relation to those between strains of the same species. Previous classifications of , which are based solely on morphological criteria, do not adequately reflect the diversity of these amoebae.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-107-2-211
1978-08-01
2022-01-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/107/2/mic-107-2-211.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-107-2-211&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adam K. M. G. 1959; The growth of Acanth-amoeba sp. in a chemically defined medium. Journal of General Microbiology 21:519–529
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adam K. M. G. 1964a; The amino-acid requirements of Acanthamoeba sp. Neff. Journal of Protozoology 11:98–100
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Adam K. M. G. 1964b; A comparative study of hartmannellid amoebae. Journal of Protozoology 11:423–430
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Adam K. M. G., Blewett D. A. 1974; Studies on the DNA of Acanthamoeba . Annales de la Société belge de médecine tropicale 54:387–393
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chagla A. H., Griffiths A. J. 1974; Growth and encystation of Acanthamoeba castellanii . Journal of General Microbiology 85:139–145
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Friz C. T. 1974; Taxonomic comparisons of Amoeba proteus, Amoeba dubia and Chaos carolinensis I. Observations using the principles of numerical taxonomy. Archiv fur Protistenkunde 116:236–243
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Halevy S., Finkelstein S. 1965; Lipid composition of soil amoebae. Journal of Protozoology 12:250–253
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Halevy S., Avivi L., Katan H. 1966; Sterols of soil amoebas and Ochromonas danica Phylogenetic approach. Journal of Protozoology 13:480–483
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Page F. C. 1967; Re-definition of the genus Acanthamoeba with descriptions of three species. Journal of Protozoology 14:709–724
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Page F. C. 1976; An Illustrated Key to Freshwater and Soil Amoebae. Scientific Publication34 Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association;
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pussard M. 1966; Le genre Acanthamoeba Volkonsky 1931 (Hartmannellidae : Amoebida). Protistologica 2:71–93
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sneath P. H. A. 1968; Vigour and pattern in taxonomy. Journal of General Microbiology 54:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sokal R. R., Michener C. D. 1958; A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Kansas University Science Bulletin 38:1409–1438
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stratford M. P., Griffiths A. J. 1978; Variations in the properties and morphology of cysts of Acanthamoeba castellanii . Journal of General Microbiology in the Press
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Willaert E. 1976; Étude immuno-taxonomique des genres Naegleria et Acanthamoeba (Protozoa: Amoebida). Acta zoologica et pathologica antverpiensis 65:4–239
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-107-2-211
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-107-2-211
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error