%0 Journal Article %A Matin, A. %A Veldkamp, H. %T Physiological Basis of the Selective Advantage of a Spirillum sp. in a Carbon-limited Environment %D 1978 %J Microbiology, %V 105 %N 2 %P 187-197 %@ 1465-2080 %R https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-105-2-187 %I Microbiology Society, %X Summary: A Spirillum sp. and a Pseudomonas sp. possessing crossing substrate saturation curves for l-lactate were isolated from fresh water by chemostat enrichment. Their K 8 and μ max values for l-lactate were: Spirillum sp., 23 m and 0·35 h−1, respectively; Pseudomonas sp., 91 μ m and 0·64 h−1, respectively. Under l-lactate limitation, Pseudomonas sp. outgrew Spirillum sp. at dilution rates (D) above 0·29 h−1, but the converse occurred at lower D values. The advantage of Spirillum sp. increased with decreasing D until, at D = 0·05 h−1 (i.e. l-lactate concentration of approximately 1 μ m), Pseudomonas sp. was eliminated from the culture essentially as a non-growing population. In Spirillum sp. the K m for l-lactate transport (5·8 μ m) was threefold lower than in Pseudomonas sp. (20 μ m); Spirillum sp. also possessed a higher V max for the transport of this substrate. The surface to volume ratio was higher in Spirillum sp. and increased more markedly than in Pseudomonas sp. in response to decreasing D. Thus, a more efficient scavenging capacity contributes to the advantage of Spirillum sp. at low concentrations of the carbon source. Although most of the enzymes of l-lactate catabolism were more active in Pseudomonas sp., NADH oxidase activity was about twice as high in Spirillum sp.; and, unlike Pseudomonas sp., the cytochrome c content of this bacterium increased markedly with decreasing D. A more active and/or more efficient respiratory chain may therefore also play a role in the advantage of Spirillum sp. The other factors which appear to be involved include a lower energy of maintenance of Spirillum sp. [0·016 g l-lactate (g cell dry wt)−1 h−1 compared with 0·066 in Pseudomonas sp.] and a lower minimal growth rate. %U https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-105-2-187