1887

Abstract

Low-resolution pyrolysis gas-liquid chromatography (p.g.l.c.) can differentiate genera of aerobic food spoilage bacteria. Multivariate statistical techniques were applied but neither principal components nor furthest neighbour cluster analysis produced a consistent differentiation although both confirmed the reproducibility of p.g.l.c. When the distance between genera was redefined in terms of Mahalanobis - a generalized concept taking into account scatter around the mean - good differentiation was observed and could be displayed graphically by plotting the genus group means relative to the first two canonical variate axes. The coefficients of the canonical variates provide a strategy for discriminating between the genus groups. Some practical problems in the identification of unknowns using this technique are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-104-1-67
1978-01-01
2021-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/104/1/mic-104-1-67.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-104-1-67&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Blackith R. E., Reyment R. A. 1971 Multi-variate Morphometries. London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carmichael J. W., Sneath P. H. A. 1969; Taxometric maps. Systematic Zoology 18:402–415
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carmichael J. W., Sekhon A. S., Sigler L. 1973; Classification of some dermatophytes by pyrolysis gas-liquid chromatography. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 19:403–407
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowan S. T., Steel K. J. 1974 Identification of Medical Bacteria, 2nd edn.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eshuis W., Kistemaker P. G., Meuzelaar H. L. C. 1977; Some numerical aspects of repro¬ducibility and specificity. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Analytical Pyro-lysis pp. 151–166 Roland Jones C. E., Cramers C. A. Edited by Amsterdam: Elsevier;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedman H. P., Rubin J. 1967; On some invariant criteria for grouping data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62:1152–1178
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gardner G. A. 1966; A selective medium for the enumeration of Microbacterium thermosphactum in meat and meat products. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 29:455–460
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haddadin J. M., Stirland R. M., Preston N. W., Collard P. 1973; Identification of Vibrio cholerae by pyrolysis gas-liquid chromatography. Applied Microbiology 25:40–43
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kistemaker P. G., Meuzelaar H. L. C., Posthumus M. A. 1975; Rapid and automated identification by Curie point pyrolysis techniques. II. Fast identification of microbiological samples by Curie point pyrolysis mass spectrometry. In New Approaches to the Identification of Microorganisms pp. 179–191 Heden C. G., Illeni T. Edited by London: Wiley;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mahalanobis P. C. 1936; On the generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India 249–55
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Marriott F. H. C. 1974 The Interpretation of Multiple Observations London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Menger R. M., Epstein G. A., Goldberg D. M., Reiner E. 1972; Computer matching of pyrolysis chromatograms of pathogenic microorganisms. Analytical Chemistry 44:423–424
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meuzelaar H. L. C., Kistemaker P. C., Eshuis W., Engel H. W. B. 1976; Progress in automated and computerised characterisation of micro-organisms by pyrolysis mass spectrometry. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology pp. 225–230 Oxford: Learned Information Limited;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Quinn P. A. 1974; Development of high resolution pyrolysis gas chromatography for the identification of micro-organisms. Journal of Chromato-graphic Science 12:796–806
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Quinn P. A. 1976; Identification by pyrolysis: the state of the art. In Proceedings of the 2nd Inter-national Symposium on Rapid Methods and Auto-mation in Microbiology pp. 178–186 Oxford: Learned Information Limited;
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Reiner E. 1965; Identification of bacterial strains by pyrolysis gas-liquid chromatography. Nature, London 206:1272–1274
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Reiner E., Hicks J. J., Ball M. M., Martin W. J. 1972; Rapid characterisation of Salmonella organisms by means of pyrolysis gas-liquid chromatography. Analytical Chemistry 44:1058–1061
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Roy T. A., Szinai S. S. 1977; Pyrolysis gas- liquid chromatographic identification of food and drug ingredients. II. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of penicillins and cephalosporins. Journal of Chromatographic Science 14:580–584
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Seal H. L. 1966 Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Biologists London: Wiley;
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sneath P. H. A. 1972; Computer taxonomy. Methods in Microbiology 7A:29–98
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Vincent P. G., Kulik M. M. 1974; Pyrolysis gas-liquid chromatography of fungi: numerical characterisation of species variation among members of the Aspergillus group. Mycopathologia et mycologia applicata 51:251–265
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson M. E., Oyama V., Vango S. P. 1962; Design features of a lunar gas chromatograph. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Gas Chromatography pp. 329–38 Brenner N. Edited by New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-104-1-67
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-104-1-67
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error