1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Gonococci from subcutaneously implanted chambers in guinea pigs produced, on agar, more than 95% small colonies showing a ‘double highlight’ (DH) effect in oblique reflected light combined with transmitted light. Laboratory strains of gonococci produced some DH colonies, but others showed a single highlight (SH) or no highlight (NH). Selection of DH colonies and comparison of their organisms with gonococci grown and with those from SH colonies, showed that the DH character was associated with high infectivity for guinea-pig chambers, resistance to killing by human phagocytes and heavy pilation. Furthermore, DH colonies were found in the first culture of three fresh samples of urethral pus. Thus, the DH colony characteristic may be a more reliable criterion of pathogenicity of gonococcal isolates than systems used previously. There were, however, some differences between the gonococci grown and the DH colony types. The gonococci grown and cultured once on solid medium possessed one or two antigens which differed from those of DH (or SH) colonies. They also formed smooth suspensions (which separated slowly) in saline, compared with the rough suspensions (which separated quickly) formed by gonococci from DH (or SH) colonies. Finally, the organisms grown were resistant to killing by human serum whereas the DH (and SH) colony types were susceptible; the resistance of the organisms grown was lost during one subculture on agar suggesting that the property is a phenotypic characteristic. Hence, in addition to selecting DH colony types the conditions produce organisms which differ, probably phenotypically, from cultured organisms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-100-1-147
1977-05-01
2021-05-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/100/1/mic-100-1-147.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-100-1-147&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Brown W. J., Kraus S. J. 1974; Gonococcal colony types. Journal of the American Medical Association 228:862–863
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gibbs D. L., Roberts R. B. 1975; The interaction in vitro between human polymorphonuclear leucocytes and Neisseria gonorrhoeae cultivated in the chick embryo. Journal of Experimental Medicine 141:155–171
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Glynn A. A., Ward M. E. 1970; Nature and heterogeneity of the antigens of Neisseria gonorrhoeae involved in the serum bactericidal reaction. Infection and Immunity 2:162–168
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jephcott A. E., Reyn A. 1971; Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Colony variation. I. Actapathologica et micro-biologica scandinavica B79:609–614
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kellogg D. S. Jr Peacock W. L. Jr Deacon W. E., Brown L., Pirkle C. I. 1963; Neisseria gonorrhoeae. I. Virulence genetically linked to clonal variation. Journal of Bacteriology 85:1274–1279
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kellogg D. S. Jr Cohen I. R., Norins L. C., schroeter A. L., Reising G. 1968; Neisseria gonorrhoeae. II. Colonial variation and pathogenicity during 35 months in vitro . Journal of Bacteriology 96:596–605
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kraus S. J., Glassman L. H. 1974; scanning electron microscope study of Neisseria gonorrhoeae . Applied Microbiology 27:584–592
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mahoney J. F., Vanslyke C. J., Cutler J. C., Blum H. L. 1946; Experimental gonococcic urethritis in human volunteers. American Journal of Syphilis, Gonorrhoea and Venereal Diseases 30:1–39
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McCutchan J. A., Levine S., Braude A. I. 1976; Influence of colony type on susceptibility of gonococci to killing by human serum. Journal of Immunology 116:1652–1655
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Novotny P., Short J. A., Walker P. D. 1975; An electron microscope study of naturally occurring and cultured cells of Neisseria gonorrhoeae . Journal of Medical Microbiology 8:413–427
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Penn C. W., Sen D., Veale D. R., Parsons N. J., Smith H., Witt K. 1976; Morphological, biological and antigenic properties of Neisseria gonorrhoeae adapted to growth in guinea-pig subcutaneous chambers. Journal of General Microbiology 97:35–43
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Penn C. W., Parsons N. J., Sen D., Veale D. R., Smith H. 1977; Immunization of guinea pigs with Neisseria gonorrhoeae: strain specificity and mechanisms of immunity. Journal of General Microbiology 100:159–166
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Reyn A., Jephcott A. E., Ravn H. 1971; Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Colony variation. II. Acta pathologica et microbiologica scandinavica B79:435–436
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith H. 1972; The little known determinants of microbial pathogenicity. Symposium of the Society for General Microbiology 22:1–24
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Veale D. R., Smith H., Witt K., Marshall R. B. 1975; Differential ability of colonial types of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to produce infection and an inflammatory response in subcutaneous perforated plastic chambers in guinea pigs and rabbits. Journal of Medical Microbiology 8:325–335
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Veale D. R., Sen D., Penn C. W., Finch H., Smith H. 1977; Interaction of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with guinea pig defence mechanisms in subcutaneously implanted chambers. FEMS Microbiology Letters (in the Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ward M. E., Watt P. J., Glynn A. A. 1970; Gonococci in urethral exudates possess a virulence factor lost on subculture. Nature; London: 227:382–384
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Witt K., Veale D. R., Finch H., Penn C. W., Sen D., Smith H. 1976a; Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae grown in vivo to ingestion and digestion by phagocytes of human blood. Journal of General Microbiology 96:341–350
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Witt K., Veale D. R., Smith H. 1976b; Resistance to ingestion and digestion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by phagocytes of human buffy coat. Journal of Medical Microbiology 9:1–12
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-100-1-147
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-100-1-147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error