1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: The inoculation of killed into the developing avian embryo on or after the 17th day of incubation or of live into young chicks evoked no immediate antibody response. Approximately 20–40 days after hatching, however, agglutinins and non-agglutinating antibodies were sometimes detected in the sera of these chicks. Maximum antibody production did not occur until the chicks were approximately 100 days old.

The intravenous inoculation of killed into developing embryos on or before the 15th day of incubation stimulated the production of practically no demonstrable antibody by the chicks during approximately the first 80 or 100 days after hatching. These chicks, however, showed a marked decrease in capacity to produce demonstrable antibodies in their sera after subsequent oral infection with .

These experimental results are discussed in relation to various theories of antibody production. It is suggested that they are evidence in support of Burnet’s adaptive enzyme theory. The results are explained on the hypothesis that the introduction of antigenic material into the embryo under suitable experimental conditions enables the host cells to become adapted to the antigen, resulting in a diminished antibody response by the host, during post-embryonic life, to a subsequent challenge with similar antigenic material.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-10-3-398
1954-06-01
2021-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/10/3/mic-10-3-398.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-10-3-398&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Basset J. 1951; Fièvre aphtheuse. Le vaccin de Waldmann et sa posologie. Origine des anticorps et mécanisme de l’immunité. Bull. Acad. vét. Fr 24:21
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beveridge W. I. B., Burnet F. M. 1946; The cultivation of viruses and rickettsiae in the chick embryo. Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond256
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brandt L. W., Clegg R. E., Andrews A. C. 1951; The effect of age and degree of maturity on the serum proteins of the chicken. J. Mol. Chem 191:105
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burnet F. M. 1941; Growth of influenza virus in the allantoic cavity of the chick embryo. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci 19:291
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burnet F. M., Fenner F. 1948; Genetics and immunology. Heredity 2:289
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burnet F. M., Fenner F. 1949 The Production of Antibodies Monograph, Walter and Eliza Hall Inst., Melbourne: Macmillan and Co. Ltd;
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Burnet F. M., Stone J. D., Edney M. 1950; The failure of antibody production in the chick embryo. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci 22:291
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Buxton A. 1951; Transfer of bacterial antibodies from the hen to the chick. Nature; Lond: 168657
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Buxton A. 1952; On the transference of bacterial antibodies from the hen to the chick. J. gen. Microbiol 7:268
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fox J. P., Laemmert H. W. 1947; Cultivation of yellow fever virus: observations on infection of developing chick embryo. Amer. J. Hyg 46:21
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Grasset E. G. 1929; Recherches sur la sensibilité du tissu embryonnaire aux antigènes. Assais d’immunisation comparèe de l’embryos de poulet et de la poule adtulte. C.R. Soc. Biol Paris: 1011102
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haurowitz F. 1949; Biological problems and immunochemistry. Quart. Rev. Biol 24:93
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Herdegen M., Halbert S. P., Mudd S. 1947; Persistence of antigen at the site of inoculation of vaccine emulsified in oil. J. Immunol 56:357
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hinshelwood C. N. 1946 The Chemical Kinetics of the Bacterial Cell pp. 284 Oxford: Clarendon Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Masurier H. E. le, Branion H. D., Marcellus F. M. 1946; Observations on unabsorbed yolk in chicks. Poult. Sci 25:300
    [Google Scholar]
  16. McMaster P. D., Kruse H. 1951; The persistence in mice of certain foreign proteins and azoprotein tracer-antigens derived from them. J. exp. Med 94:323
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Monod J. 1949; The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 3:371
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Murphy J. B. 1913; Transplantability of tissues to the embryo of foreign species. Its bearing on questions of tissue specificity and tumour immunity. J. exp. Med 17:482
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Murphy J. B. 1914; Factors of resistance to heteroplastic tissue-grafting. Studies in tissue specificity. III. J. exp. Med 19:513
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Murphy J. B. 1916; The effect of adult chicken organ grafts on the chick embryo. J. exp. Med 24:1
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Norton S., Wolfe H. R., Crowe J. R. 1950; Effect of injections of soluble antigens on the spleen size and antibody production in chickens. Anat. Rec 107:133
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pauling L. 1940; A theory of the structure and process of formation of antibodies. J. Amer. chem. Soc 62:2640
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Polk A., Buddingh G. J., Goodpasture E. W. 1938; Experimental study of complement and haemolytic amboceptor introduced with chick embryos. Amer. J. Path 14:71
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rywosch M. 1907; Über Hämolyse und Baktericidie des embryonalen Hühner-blutes. Zbl. Bakt 44:468
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sevag M.G. 1951 Immuno-catalysis, 2nd ed. Springfield (Illinois): Charles C. Thomas;
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sherman H. W. 1919a; Antibodies in the fetus. J. infect. Dis 24:1
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sherman H. W. 1919b; Antibodies in the chick. J. infect. Dis 25:256
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stevenson H. N. 1917; Tumour immunity in the chick embryo. J. Cancer Res 2:245–449
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stevenson H. N. 1918; Growth of tumours in the chick embryo. J. Cancer Res 3:63
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Weinberg M., Guelin A. 1936; Recherche sur l’immunité active de l’embryon. C.R. Soc. Biol Paris: 1221229
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-10-3-398
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-10-3-398
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error