1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: The basis of variation in morphological appearance of first cultures of , isolated from diseased roots and corms of prematurely yellowed Gladiolus plants, was investigated. The occurrence of mutations is considered to be far too infrequent to account for the wide range of variability of the fungus in culture, and the existence of heterocaryons of mixed morphologically distinct genotypes is considered.

Cytological studies show that each microconidium contains one nucleus which is derived by mitosis from the single nucleus of the conidiophore. Hyphal tip cells contain an average of seven nuclei whilst the cells behind, in the older parts of the hyphae, contain only one nucleus each or, more rarely, two. Anastomoses between germ tubes from conidia of different morphological variants occur very frequently and may provide a means whereby heterocaryons are formed.

Synthesis of heterocaryotic cultures is achieved by simultaneous inoculation of plates containing plain water agar medium. Hyphal tips were separately removed from the mixed colonies thus produced and analysed by single-sporing the resulting colonies. Media varying in carbon content and in carbon/nitrogen ratio proved to have a selective action upon one or other of the homotypes constituting a heterokaryon of two known morphologically distinct variants. By use of such media, it was shown that the ratios of nuclei homotypic for ‘flat sporodochial’ and ‘aerial microconidial’ variants was altered according to the relative concentrations of carbon or nitrogen in the culture medium.

A discussion follows on the bearing of these results on the reliability of hitherto important taxonomic criteria in a classification of these fungi. The isolates of f. include a wide range of morphological variants which may be included in Snyder & Hansen’s . The existence of neterocaryons between taxonomic variants and their plasticity under various cultural conditions, poses the question of their status in any satisfactory classificatory system.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-10-1-71
1954-02-01
2022-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/10/1/mic-10-1-71.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-10-1-71&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Appel O., Wollenweber H.W. 1910; Grundlagen einer Monographic der Gattung Fusarium(Link). Arb. biol. Abt. (Anst.-Reichsanst.), Berl. 8:1–207
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker G.E. 1944; Heterocaryosis in Penicillium notaium. Bull. Torrey bot. Cl. 71:367
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beadle G.W., Coonradt V.L. 1944; Heterocaryosis in Neurospora crassa. Genetics 29:291
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown W. 1925; Studies in the genus Fusarium.II. An analysis of the factors which determine the growth-forms of certain strains. Ann. Bot., Bond. 39:873
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown W. 1926; Studies in the genus Fusarium.IV. On the occurrence of saltations. Ann. Bot., Lond. 40:223
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown W. 1928; Studies in the genus Fusarium.VI. General description of strains, together with a discussion of the principles at present adopted in the classification of Fusarium. Ann. Bot., Lond. 42:285
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown W., Horne A.S. 1924; Studies in the genus Fusarium.I. General account. Ann. Bot., Lond. 38:379
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown W., Horne A.S. 1926; Studies in the genus Fusarium.III. An analysis of factors which determine certain microscopic features of Fusarium strains. Ann. Bot., Lond. 40:203
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Buxton E.W., Robertson N.F. 1953; The Fusarium Yellows disease of Gladiolus. Plant Pathology 2:61
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gordon W.L. 1952; The occurrence of Fusarium species in cereal seed. Canad. J. Bot. 30:209
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hansen H.N. 1938; The dual phenomenon in Imperfect Fungi. Mycologia 30:442
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heubschman C. 1952; A method for varying the average number of nuclei in the conidia of Neurospora crassa. Mycologia 44:599
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jinks J.L. 1952; Heterocaryosis-a system of adaptation in wild fungi. Proc. roy. Soc. B 14083
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Massey L.M. 1926; Fusarium rot of Gladiolus corms. Phytopathology 16:509
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mcculloch L. 1944; Fusarium Yellows of Gladiolus. Phytopathology 34:263
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller J.J. 1946; Cultural and taxonomic studies on certain fusaria. Canad. J. Res. C 24:188
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pontecorvo G. 1946; Genetic systems based on heterocaryosis. Cold Spr. Hath. Symp. quant. Biol. 11:193
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Snyder W.C., Hansen H.N. 1940; The species concept in Fusarium. Amer. J. Bot. 27:64
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Snyder W.C., Hansen H.N. 1945; The species concept in Fusarium with reference to Discolor and other sections. Amer. J. Bot. 32:657
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Subramanian C.V. 1951; Is there a ‘wild-type’ in the genus Fusarium?. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India 17403
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wollenweber H.W., Reinking O.A. 1935 Die Fusarien. Berlin:: Paul Parey.;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-10-1-71
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-10-1-71
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error