Skip to content
1887

Abstract

is a pathogen that frequently causes infections and outbreaks in hospitals. Despite the increasing need for genomic surveillance of , a standardized genomic analysis framework for this pathogen is lacking. We aim to conduct a comprehensive global epidemiological overview and propose a genomic analysis framework. We analysed 21,058 public genomes from 80 countries to create a comprehensive snapshot of resistome and virulence in association with geography and population structure. We compared strain clustering based on SNP-based and sequence typing-based approaches with ST80 genomes as examples, to establish the methodological comparability for outbreak investigations using different approaches. Focusing on the resistance genotypes against vancomycin and linezolid, we observed within-sequence type (ST) dynamics, such as a -to- transition within ST80 isolates in Denmark driven by the clonal expansion and dissemination of mobile linezolid resistance among ST22 and ST32. We established that the popularly used 25 allele distance threshold based on core genome multi-locus sequence typing corresponds to 86 core genome SNPs or 380 whole-genome SNPs. Finally, we introduce , a user-friendly analytical tool to streamline the genomic surveillance of , which enables consistent interpretation of antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiles from genome sequences. By providing this tool and empirically bridging the outbreak investigation thresholds of different phylogenetic methods, our study facilitates and improves the genomic surveillance of .

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001573
2025-11-20
2025-12-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/11/11/mgen001573.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001573&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Levine DP. Vancomycin: a history. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42 Suppl 1:S5–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Rubinstein E, Keynan Y. Vancomycin revisited - 60 years later. Front Public Health 2014; 2:217 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18:318–327 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance National nosocomial infections surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from january 1992-april 2000, issued june 2000. Am J Infect Control 2000; 28:429–448 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou X, Willems RJL, Friedrich AW, Rossen JWA, Bathoorn E. Enterococcus faecium: from microbiological insights to practical recommendations for infection control and diagnostics. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:130 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pidot SJ, Gao W, Buultjens AH, Monk IR, Guerillot R et al. Increasing tolerance of hospital Enterococcus faecium to handwash alcohols. Sci Transl Med 2018; 10:eaar6115 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sherry NL, Gorrie CL, Kwong JC, Higgs C, Stuart RL et al. Multi-site implementation of whole genome sequencing for hospital infection control: a prospective genomic epidemiological analysis. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2022; 23:100446 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunashal Y, Kumar GS, Choy MS, D’Andréa ÉD, Da Silva Santiago A et al. Molecular basis of β-lactam antibiotic resistance of ESKAPE bacterium E. faecium penicillin binding protein PBP5. Nat Commun 2023; 14:4268 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hollenbeck BL, Rice LB. Intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms in enterococcus. Virulence 2012; 3:421–433 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gorrie C, Higgs C, Carter G, Stinear TP, Howden B. Genomics of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Microb Genom 2019; 5:e000283 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Arredondo-Alonso S, Top J, Corander J, Willems RJL, Schürch AC. Mode and dynamics of vanA-type vancomycin resistance dissemination in Dutch hospitals. Genome Med 2021; 13:9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wardal E, Kuch A, Gawryszewska I, Żabicka D, Hryniewicz W et al. Diversity of plasmids and Tn1546-type transposons among VanA Enterococcus faecium in Poland. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 36:313–328 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Freitas AR, Tedim AP, Francia MV, Jensen LB, Novais C et al. Multilevel population genetic analysis of vanA and vanB Enterococcus faecium causing nosocomial outbreaks in 27 countries (1986-2012). J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71:3351–3366 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bae H-G, Sung H, Kim M-N, Lee E-J, Koo Lee S. First report of a linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strain in Korea. Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases 2006; 38:383–386 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang Q, Peng K, Liu Z, Li Y, Xiao X et al. Genomic insights into linezolid-resistant Enterococci revealed its evolutionary diversity and poxtA copy number heterogeneity. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2023; 62:106929 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yoo SJ, Sung H, Cho Y-U, Kim M-N, Pai CH et al. Role of horizontal transfer of the transposon Tn1546 in the nosocomial spread of vanA vancomycin-resistant enterococci at a tertiary care hospital in Korea. Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2006; 27:1081–1087 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Snitkin ES, Zelazny AM, Thomas PJ, Stock F, Henderson DK et al. Tracking a hospital outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with whole-genome sequencing. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4:148ra116–148ra116 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Uelze L, Grützke J, Borowiak M, Hammerl JA, Juraschek K et al. Typing methods based on whole genome sequencing data. One Health Outlook 2020; 2:3 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Payne M, Octavia S, Luu LDW, Sotomayor-Castillo C, Wang Q et al. Enhancing genomics-based outbreak detection of endemic Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium using dynamic thresholds. Microbial Genomics 2021; 7:000310 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Duval A, Opatowski L, Brisse S. Defining genomic epidemiology thresholds for common-source bacterial outbreaks: a modelling study. Lancet Microbe 2023; 4:e349–e357 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tagini F, Pillonel T, Greub G. Whole-genome sequencing for bacterial virulence assessment. In Moran-Gilad J, Yagel Y. eds Application and Integration of Omics-Powered Diagnostics in Clinical and Public Health Microbiology Cham: Springer; 2021 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hawkey J, Paranagama K, Baker KS, Bengtsson RJ, Weill F-X et al. Global population structure and genotyping framework for genomic surveillance of the major dysentery pathogen, Shigella sonnei. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2684 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lam MMC, Wick RR, Watts SC, Cerdeira LT, Wyres KL et al. A genomic surveillance framework and genotyping tool for Klebsiella pneumoniae and its related species complex. Nat Commun 2021; 12:4188 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Whiteside MD, Laing CR, Manji A, Kruczkiewicz P, Taboada EN et al. SuperPhy: predictive genomics for the bacterial pathogen Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol 2016; 16:65 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Diekema DJ, Hsueh P-R, Mendes RE, Pfaller MA, Rolston KV et al. The microbiology of bloodstream infection: 20-year trends from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63:e00355-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:124 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Frye JG, Haendiges J et al. AMRFinderPlus and the Reference Gene Catalog facilitate examination of the genomic links among antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and virulence. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12728 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis--10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D694–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. de Been M, Pinholt M, Top J, Bletz S, Mellmann A et al. Core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for high- resolution typing of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53:3788–3797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Harris SR. SKA: split kmer analysis toolkit for bacterial genomic epidemiology. Genomics 2018 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rios R, Reyes J, Carvajal LP, Rincon S, Panesso D et al. Genomic epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) in Latin America: revisiting the global VRE population structure. Sci Rep 2020; 10:5636 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pratama R, Beukers AG, McIver CJ, Keighley CL, Taylor PC et al. A vanA vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium ST80 outbreak resulting from a single importation event. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:31–37 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Egan SA, Kavanagh NL, Shore AC, Mollerup S, Samaniego Castruita JA et al. Genomic analysis of 600 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium reveals a high prevalence of ST80 and spread of similar vanA regions via IS1216E and plasmid transfer in diverse genetic lineages in Ireland. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:320–330 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Leigh RJ, McKenna C, McWade R, Lynch B, Walsh F. Comparative genomics and pangenomics of vancomycin-resistant and susceptible Enterococcus faecium from Irish hospitals. J Med Microbiol 2022; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Piezzi V, Wassilew N, Atkinson A, D’Incau S, Kaspar T et al. Nosocomial outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) ST796, Switzerland, 2017 to 2020. Eurosurveillance 2022; 27:2200285 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Messele YE, Trott DJ, Hasoon MF, Veltman T, McMeniman JP et al. Phylogeny, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance gene profiles of Enterococcus faecium isolated from Australian feedlot cattle and their significance to public and environmental health. Antibiotics 2023; 12:1122 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Almeida-Santos AC, Novais C, Peixe L, Freitas AR. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: a current perspective on resilience, adaptation, and the urgent need for novel strategies. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2025; 41:233–252 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Krawczyk B, Wityk P, Gałęcka M, Michalik M. The many faces of Enterococcus spp.-commensal, probiotic and opportunistic pathogen. Microorganisms 2021; 9:1900 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Gomez-Simmonds A, Annavajhala MK, Tang N, Rozenberg FD, Ahmad M et al. Population structure of blaKPC-harbouring IncN plasmids at a New York City medical centre and evidence for multi-species horizontal transmission. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:1873–1882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ahmed MO, Baptiste KE. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci: a review of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and perspectives of human and animal health. Microb Drug Resist 2018; 24:590–606 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hawkins MR, Medvedeva N, Wang H, Banaei N, Holubar MK. “Keeping us on our toes”: a review of what clinicians need to know about vancomycin-variable Enterococcus. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2024; 4:e200 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pendle S, Jelfs P, Olma T, Su Y, Gilroy N et al. Difficulties in detection and identification of Enterococcus faecium with low-level inducible resistance to vancomycin, during a hospital outbreak. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14:853–857 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Nasir SAR, Zeeshan M, Ghanchi N, Saeed N, Ghayas H et al. Linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates from Pakistan: a genomic analysis. BMC Microbiol 2024; 24:347 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mortelé O, van Kleef-van Koeveringe S, Vandamme S, Jansens H, Goossens H et al. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus clinical isolates in Belgium from 2013 to 2021. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2024; 38:21–26 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jung J, Park K, Shin SH, Lee JY, Kim MN et al. The pitfall of cohort isolation in an outbreak of linezolid-resistant, vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Microbiol Infect 2019; 25:1568–1569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Marshall SH, Donskey CJ, Hutton-Thomas R, Salata RA, Rice LB. Gene dosage and linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:3334–3336 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Bender JK, Fleige C, Funk F, Moretó-Castellsagué C, Fischer MA et al. Linezolid resistance genes and mutations among linezolid-susceptible Enterococcus spp.—a loose cannon?. Antibiotics 2024; 13:101 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Coll F, Gouliouris T, Blane B, Yeats CA, Raven KE et al. Antibiotic resistance determination using Enterococcus faecium whole-genome sequences: a diagnostic accuracy study using genotypic and phenotypic data. Lancet Microbe 2024; 5:e151–e163 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsang KK, Maguire F, Zubyk HL, Chou S, Edalatmand A et al. Identifying novel β-lactamase substrate activity through in silico prediction of antimicrobial resistance. Microbial Genomics 2021; 7:000500 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kim JI, Maguire F, Tsang KK, Gouliouris T, Peacock SJ et al. Machine learning for antimicrobial resistance prediction: current practice, limitations, and clinical perspective. Clin Microbiol Rev 2022; 35:e0017921 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. de Been M, van Schaik W, Cheng L, Corander J, Willems RJ. Recent recombination events in the core genome are associated with adaptive evolution in Enterococcus faecium. Genome Biol Evol 2013; 5:1524–1535 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001573
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001573
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Supplementary material 3

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error