Skip to content
1887

Microbial Genomics logo Microbial Genomics

Volume 11, Issue 11

Novel insights into the genome organization of : identification of linear plasmids Open Access

Abstract

Members of the family typically have multipartite genomes that are split between two or more replicons, including the chromosome and a variable number of extrachromosomal replicons (chromids and plasmids). Nearly all replicons sequenced and described to date have a circular topology, except the linear chromid found in the genomes of most spp. In this study, genomes of five non-pathogenic strains and one plant tumourigenic strain were fully sequenced. Surprisingly, genome analysis revealed that these six strains each carry an 80-kbp linear plasmid. Linear plasmids have so far not been identified in this bacterial family or other bacteria within the class . The ends of all six plasmids identified in this study have a hairpin structure with covalently closed ends. The plasmid sequences showed a high degree of homology, clearly indicating their common ancestry. Database searches led to the identification of additional linear plasmids in previously published genome assemblies that were not previously recognized to have linear plasmids, suggesting that these replicons may be more widespread. Most likely, linear plasmids may be even more widely distributed than anticipated. Although the biological functions of the linear plasmids identified in this study remain unknown, they are associated with both non-pathogenic and plant tumourigenic strains.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): assembly , Eckhardt gel , genome organization , Nanopore sequencing , PFGE and protelomerase (telomere resolvase)
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Award Discovery Grant)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MichaelF. Hynes
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Award RGPIN-2020-07000)
    • Principal Award Recipient: GeorgeC. diCenzo
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Award 429677233)
    • Principal Award Recipient: NemanjaKuzmanovic
© 2025 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001537
2025-11-05
2025-12-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/11/11/mgen001537.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001537&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. diCenzo GC, Yang Y, Young JPW, Kuzmanović N. Refining the taxonomy of the order Hyphomicrobiales (Rhizobiales) based on whole genome comparisons of over 130 type strains. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006328 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Carareto Alves LM, de SJ, AdM V, Lemos EG de Macedo. The family Rhizobiaceae. In Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. eds The Prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014 pp 419–437
     [Google Scholar]
  3. de Lajudie PM, Andrews M, Ardley J, Eardly B, Jumas-Bilak E et al. Minimal standards for the description of new genera and species of rhizobia and agrobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1852–1863 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuzmanović N, diCenzo GC, Bunk B, Spröer C, Frühling A et al. Genomics of the “tumorigenes” clade of the family rhizobiaceae and description of Rhizobium rhododendri sp. nov. MicrobiologyOpen 2013; 12:e1352 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Escobar MA, Dandekar AM. Agrobacterium tumefaciens as an agent of disease. Trends Plant Sci 2003; 8:380–386 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Kuzmanović N, Biondi E, Overmann J, Puławska J, Verbarg S et al. Genomic analysis provides novel insights into diversification and taxonomy of Allorhizobium vitis (i.e. Agrobacterium vitis). BMC Genomics 2022; 23:462 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Geddes BA, Kearsley J, Morton R, diCenzo GC, Finan TM. Chapter Eight - The genomes of rhizobia. In Frendo P, Frugier F, Masson-Boivin C. eds Advances in Botanical Research Academic Press; 2020 pp 213–249 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. diCenzo GC, Finan TM. The divided bacterial genome: structure, function, and evolution. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2017; 81: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Harrison PW, Lower RPJ, Kim NKD, Young JPW. Introducing the bacterial “chromid”: not a chromosome, not a plasmid. Trends Microbiol 2010; 18:141–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall JPJ, Botelho J, Cazares A, Baltrus DA. What makes a megaplasmid?. Phil Trans R Soc B 2022; 377:20200472 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Allardet-Servent A, Michaux-Charachon S, Jumas-Bilak E, Karayan L, Ramuz M. Presence of one linear and one circular chromosome in the Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 genome. J Bacteriol 1993; 175:7869–7874 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramírez-Bahena MH, Vial L, Lassalle F, Diel B, Chapulliot D et al. Single acquisition of protelomerase gave rise to speciation of a large and diverse clade within the Agrobacterium/Rhizobium supercluster characterized by the presence of a linear chromid. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2014; 73:202–207 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Slater S, Setubal JC, Goodner B, Houmiel K, Sun J et al. Reconciliation of sequence data and updated annotation of the genome of agrobacterium tumefaciens C58, and distribution of a linear chromosome in the genus Agrobacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:1414–1417 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang WM, DaGloria J, Fox H, Ruan Q, Tillou J et al. Linear chromosome-generating system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58: protelomerase generates and protects hairpin ends. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:25551–25563 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Naranjo HD, Lebbe L, Cnockaert M, Lassalle F, Too CC et al. Phylogenomics reveals insights into the functional evolution of the genus Agrobacterium and enables the description of Agrobacterium divergens sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2023; 46:126420 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kinashi H. Linear Plasmids from actinomycetes. Actinomycetologica 1994; 8:87–96 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Chaconas G, Kobryn K. Structure, function, and evolution of linear replicons in Borrelia. Annu Rev Microbiol 2010; 64:185–202 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hawkey J, Cottingham H, Tokolyi A, Wick RR, Judd LM et al. Linear plasmids in Klebsiella and other Enterobacteriaceae. Microb Genom 2022; 8: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Baker S, Hardy J, Sanderson KE, Quail M, Goodhead I et al. A novel linear plasmid mediates flagellar variation in Salmonella typhi. PLoS Pathog 2007; 3:e59 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuzmanović N, Biondi E, Bertaccini A, Obradović A. Genetic relatedness and recombination analysis of Allorhizobium vitis strains associated with grapevine crown gall outbreaks in Europe. J Appl Microbiol 2015; 119:786–796 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuzmanović N, Nesme J, Wolf J, Neumann-Schaal M, Petersen J et al. Deciphering the key players of the bacterial microbiota associated with aerial crown gall tumors on rhododendron: insights into the gallobiome. Phytobiomes J 2024; 8:401–415 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021; 10: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Wick RR, Judd LM, Holt KE. Assembling the perfect bacterial genome using oxford nanopore and illumina sequencing. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1010905 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:540–546 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kosakovsky Pond SL, Posada D, Gravenor MB, Woelk CH, Frost SDW. GARD: a genetic algorithm for recombination detection. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:3096–3098 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Wick RR, Holt KE. Benchmarking of long-read assemblers for prokaryote whole genome sequencing. F1000Res 2019; 8:2138 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Li H. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:2103–2110 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res 2017; 27:737–746 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 2017; 27:722–736 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol 2021; 22:266 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Wick RR, Howden BP, Stinear TP. Autocycler: long-read consensus assembly for bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics 2025 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Wick RR, Holt KE. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18:e1009802 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Bouras G, Houtak G, Wick RR, Mallawaarachchi V, Roach MJ et al. Hybracter: enabling scalable, automated, complete and accurate bacterial genome assemblies. Microb Genom 2024; 10:001244 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. CP in Bioinformatics 2020; 70:e102 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:3094–3100 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows–wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1754–1760 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3350–3352 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Cantalapiedra CP, Hernández-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:5825–5829 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D309–D314 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Buchfink B, Reuter K, Drost H-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 2021; 18:366–368 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S et al. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:W5–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 2004; 5:R12 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Steinegger M, Söding J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35:1026–1028 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2019; 20:1160–1166 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W232–5 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist 1978; 6:4 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 2010; 59:307–321 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC et al. Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:e115 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Kuzmanović N, Prokić A, Ivanović M, Zlatković N, Gašić K et al. Genetic diversity of tumorigenic bacteria associated with crown gall disease of raspberry in Serbia. Eur J Plant Pathol 2015; 142:701–713 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Eckhardt T. A rapid method for the identification of plasmid desoxyribonucleic acid in bacteria. Plasmid 1978; 1:584–588 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Hynes MF, Simon R, Pühler A. The development of plasmid-free strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by using incompatibility with a Rhizobium meliloti plasmid to eliminate pAtC58. Plasmid 1985; 13:99–105 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Chen S. Ultrafast one‐pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. iMeta 2023; 2:e107 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Schmidt T, Friehs K, Flaschel E. Structures of plasmid DNA. In Schleef M. eds Plasmids for Therapy and Vaccination Hoboken: Wiley-VCH; 2008 pp 29–43 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Johnson PH, Grossman LI. Electrophoresis of DNA in agarose gels. Optimizing separations of conformational isomers of double- and single-stranded DNAs. Biochemistry 1977; 16:4217–4225 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Serwer P, Allen JL. Conformation of double-stranded DNA during agarose gel electrophoresis: fractionation of linear and circular molecules with molecular weights between 3 X 10(6) and 26 X 10(6). Biochemistry 1984; 23:922–927 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Slemc L, Jakše J, Filisetti A, Baranasic D, Rodríguez-García A et al. Reference-grade genome and large linear plasmid of streptomyces rimosus: pushing the limits of nanopore sequencing. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0243421 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Williams LE, Detter C, Barry K, Lapidus A, Summers AO. Facile recovery of individual high-molecular-weight, low-copy-number natural plasmids for genomic sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:4899–4906 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Germond JE, Vogt VM, Hirt B. Characterization of the single-strand-specific nuclease S1 activity on double-stranded supercoiled polyoma DNA. Eur J Biochem 1974; 43:591–600 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Barton BM, Harding GP, Zuccarelli AJ. A general method for detecting and sizing large plasmids. Anal Biochem 1995; 226:235–240
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Basta T, Keck A, Klein J, Stolz A. Detection and characterization of conjugative degradative plasmids in xenobiotic-degrading sphingomonas strains. J Bacteriol 2004; 186:3862–3872 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Barbour AG, Garon CF. Linear plasmids of the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi have covalently closed ends. Science 1987; 237:409–411 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Wibberg D, Blom J, Jaenicke S, Kollin F, Rupp O et al. Complete genome sequencing of Agrobacterium sp. H13-3, the former Rhizobium lupini H13-3, reveals a tripartite genome consisting of a circular and a linear chromosome and an accessory plasmid but lacking a tumor-inducing Ti-plasmid. J Biotechnol 2011; 155:50–62 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Goodman MF. The discovery of error-prone DNA polymerase V and its unique regulation by RecA and ATP. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:26772–26782 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Remigi P, Capela D, Clerissi C, Tasse L, Torchet R et al. Transient hypermutagenesis accelerates the evolution of legume endosymbionts following horizontal gene transfer. PLoS Biol 2014; 12:e1001942 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Christie PJ. Type IV secretion: the Agrobacterium VirB/D4 and related conjugation systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1694:219–234 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Kubori T, Nagai H. The type IVB secretion system: an enigmatic chimera. Curr Opin Microbiol 2016; 29:22–29 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Lockwood DC, Amin H, Costa TRD, Schroeder GN. The Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm type IV secretion system and its effectors. Microbiology 2022; 168: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Nagai H, Kubori T. Type IVB secretion systems of Legionella and other gram-negative bacteria. Front Microbio 2011; 2:136 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Vogel JP, Andrews HL, Wong SK, Isberg RR. Conjugative transfer by the virulence system of Legionella pneumophila. Science 1998; 279:873–876 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Wagner A, Tittes C, Dehio C. Versatility of the BID domain: conserved function as type-iv-secretion-signal and secondarily evolved effector functions within Bartonella-infected host cells. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:921 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Costa TRD, Patkowski JB, Macé K, Christie PJ, Waksman G. Structural and functional diversity of type IV secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 2024; 22:170–185 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001537
Loading
Novel insights into the genome organization of Rhizobiaceae: identification of linear plasmids
M Gen 11, 001537 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001537
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001537
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001537
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error