Skip to content
1887

Microbial Genomics logo Microbial Genomics

Volume 11, Issue 7

Genomic insights into the diversity, antimicrobial resistance and zoonotic potential of across diverse hosts and geographies Open Access

Abstract

causes reproductive diseases in livestock and can lead to zoonotic infections such as bacteraemia, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. Despite its significance, its genomic characteristics remain poorly understood. This study analysed 114 publicly available genomes to provide global insights into genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and zoonotic risk.

A total of 32 distinct sequence types (STs) were identified across 111 of the 114 . genomes, spanning 6 continents and diverse hosts (cattle, humans, sheep and reptiles). The majority of strains from cattle (75.6%, /=34/45) were assigned to ST-4, which was the most prevalent overall (=45), while human-associated genomes exhibited the highest diversity with 16 STs. subsp. (Cfv) and its biovar (Cfvi) genomes clustered closely, forming distinct branches at the biovar level; however, six Cfv genomes were located within Cfvi clades, suggesting a shared ancestry. subsp. (Cft), primarily isolated from humans (60.0%, /=18/30), exhibited a more diverse genetic profile, with 20 STs. Cfv from North America and Cfvi from South America formed distinct geographic clusters, while subsp. genomes showed no clear geographic patterns, indicating global spread. Pangenomic analysis revealed substantial variation in gene presence/absence in Cft. Five AMR genes were detected, with ) (=3) being the most common. A total of 220 plasmid contigs were identified across 47 genomes, predominantly in Cfvi (66.8%, /=147/220) and Cfv (29.1%, /=64/220). Horizontal gene transfer analysis identified 140 genomic islands across 41 genomes, and virulence factor analysis revealed as the sole conserved virulence gene across 35 genomes.

These findings provide critical insights into the genomic diversity, zoonotic potential and global distribution of , emphasizing the need for integrated genomic and epidemiological strategies to assess its impact on human and animal health.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): antimicrobial resistance (AMR) , Campylobacter fetus , comparative genomics , horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and zoonotic transmission
© 2025 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001446
2025-07-10
2026-03-09

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/11/7/mgen001446.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001446&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bergen MAP, Putten JPM, Dingle KE, Blaser MJ, Wagenaar JA. Isolation, Identification, Subspecies Differentiation, and Typing of Campylobacter fetus. In In Campylobacter John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008 pp 213–225 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaakoush NO, Castaño-Rodríguez N, Mitchell HM, Man SM. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28:687–720 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Dumic I, Sengodan M, Franson JJ, Zea D, Ramanan P. Early onset prosthetic joint infection and bacteremia due to campylobacter fetus subspecies fetus. Case Rep Infect Dis 2017; 2017:5892846 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Fujihara N, Takakura S, Saito T, Iinuma Y, Ichiyama S. A case of perinatal sepsis by Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus infection successfully treated with carbapenem--case report and literature review. J Infect 2006; 53:e199–202 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Sahin O, Yaeger M, Wu Z, Zhang Q. Campylobacter-associated diseases in animals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2017; 5:21–42 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Zan Bar T, Yehuda R, Hacham T, Krupnik S, Bartoov B. Influence of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus on ram sperm cell quality. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57:1405–1410 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilbert MJ, Duim B, van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Wagenaar JA, Zomer AL. Homologous recombination between genetically divergent Campylobacter fetus lineages supports host-associated speciation. Genome Biol Evol 2018; 10:716–722 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Giacomelli M, Piccirillo A. Pet reptiles as potential reservoir of Campylobacter species with zoonotic potential. Vet Rec 2014; 174:479 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Iraola G, Forster SC, Kumar N, Lehours P, Bekal S et al. Distinct Campylobacter fetus lineages adapted as livestock pathogens and human pathobionts in the intestinal microbiota. Nat Commun 2017; 8:1367 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Iraola G, Pérez R, Naya H, Paolicchi F, Harris D et al. Complete genome sequence of Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis biovar intermedius, isolated from the prepuce of a bull. Genome Announc 2013; 1:e00526-13 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Oniciuc EA, Likotrafiti E, Alvarez-Molina A, Prieto M, Santos JA et al. The present and future of whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole metagenome sequencing (WMS) for surveillance of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance genes across the food chain. Genes (Basel) 2018; 9:268 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Abril C, Brodard I, Perreten V. Two novel antibiotic resistance genes, tet(44) and ant(6)-Ib, are located within a transferable pathogenicity island in Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54:3052–3055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Pena-Fernández N, van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Duim B, Zomer A, Wagenaar JA et al. Campylobacter fetus plasmid diversity: comparative analysis of fully sequenced plasmids and proposed classification scheme. Genome Biol Evol 2024; 16:evae203 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Silva MF, Pereira AL, Fraqueza MJ, Pereira G, Mateus L et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis Strains. Microorganisms 2021; 9:340 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Taylor DE, Chau AS. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gyrA gene from Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus ATCC 27374 and characterization of ciprofloxacin-resistant laboratory and clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41:665–671 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Duim B, Looft T, Veldman KT, Zomer AL et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter fetus: emergence and genomic evolution. Microb Genom 2023; 9:000934 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kienesberger S, Sprenger H, Wolfgruber S, Halwachs B, Thallinger GG et al. Comparative genome analysis of Campylobacter fetus subspecies revealed horizontally acquired genetic elements important for virulence and niche specificity. PLoS One 2014; 9:e85491 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Pena-Fernández N, Ocejo M, van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Lavín JL, Kortabarria N et al. Comparative pangenomic analysis of Campylobacter fetus isolated from Spanish bulls and other mammalian species. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4347 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Golz JC, Stingl K. Natural Competence and Horizontal Gene Transfer in Campylobacter. In Backert S. eds Fighting Campylobacter Infections: Towards a One Health Approach Springer International Publishing; 2021 pp 265–292 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65481-8_10
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL et al. KBase: The United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:566–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:124 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:W78–W82 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3691–3693 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hadfield J, Croucher NJ, Goater RJ, Abudahab K, Aanensen DM et al. Phandango: an interactive viewer for bacterial population genomics. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:292–293 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67:2640–2644 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen L, Yang J, Yu J, Yao Z, Sun L et al. VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:D325–8 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Frye JG, Haendiges J et al. AMRFinderPlus and the reference gene catalog facilitate examination of the genomic links among antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and virulence. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12728 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK et al. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W484–W492 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Vernikos GS, Parkhill J. Interpolated variable order motifs for identification of horizontally acquired DNA: revisiting the Salmonella pathogenicity islands. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:2196–2203 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Bertelli C, Brinkman FSL. Improved genomic island predictions with IslandPath-DIMOB. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:2161–2167 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Wagenaar JA, Zomer AL. RFPlasmid: predicting plasmid sequences from short-read assembly data using machine learning. Microb Genom 2021; 7:000683 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Iskandar K, Molinier L, Hallit S, Sartelli M, Hardcastle TC et al. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: a scattered picture. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021; 10:63 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Platts-Mills JA, Kosek M. Update on the burden of Campylobacter in developing countries. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2014; 27:444–450 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sher AA, Ashraf MA, Mustafa BE, Raza MM. Epidemiological trends of foodborne Campylobacter outbreaks in the United States of America, 1998-2016. Food Microbiol 2021; 97:103751 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Costa D, Iraola G. Pathogenomics of emerging Campylobacter species. Clin Microbiol Rev 2019; 32:10 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Rohr JR, Barrett CB, Civitello DJ, Craft ME, Delius B et al. Emerging human infectious diseases and the links to global food production. Nat Sustain 2019; 2:445–456 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mourkas E, Yahara K, Bayliss SC, Calland JK, Johansson H et al. Host ecology regulates interspecies recombination in bacteria of the genus Campylobacter. Elife 2022; 11:e73552 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hofer U. The complex mosaic of H. pylori evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 18:604 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Toft C, Andersson SGE. Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11:465–475 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Emele MF, Karg M, Hotzel H, Bloois LG, Groß U et al. Differentiation of Campylobacter fetus Subspecies by Proteotyping. Eur J Microbiol Immunol 2019; 9:62–71 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Miller WG, Yee E, Rijnsburger M, Wagenaar JA et al. Inconsistency of phenotypic and genomic characteristics of Campylobacter fetus subspecies requires reevaluation of current diagnostics. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:4183–4188 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu Y-H, Yamazaki W, Huang Y-T, Liao C-H, Sheng W-H et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with bacteremia caused by Campylobacter species with an emphasis on the subspecies of C. fetus. J Microbiol, Immunol Infect 2019; 52:122–131 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mshelia GD, Singh J, Amin JD, Woldehiwet Z, Egwu GO et al. Bovine venereal campylobacteriosis: an overview. CABI Reviews 200814 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Fitzgerald C, Tu ZC, Patrick M, Stiles T, Lawson AJ et al. Campylobacter fetus subsp. Testudinum subsp. nov., isolated from humans and reptiles. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2944–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gilbert MJ, Miller WG, Yee E, Zomer AL, van der Graaf-van Bloois L et al. Comparative genomics of Campylobacter fetus from reptiles and mammals reveals divergent evolution in host-associated lineages. Genome Biol Evol 2016; 8:2006–2019 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Patrick ME, Gilbert MJ, Blaser MJ, Tauxe RV, Wagenaar JA et al. Human infections with new subspecies of Campylobacter fetus. Emerg Infect Dis 2013; 19:1678–1680 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lynch CT, Buttimer C, Epping L, O’Connor J, Walsh N et al. Phenotypic and genetic analyses of two Campylobacter fetus isolates from a patient with relapsed prosthetic valve endocarditis. Pathog Dis 2022; 79:ftab055 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Tshipamba ME, Lubanza N, Mwanza M. Genome Analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors in multidrug-resistant Campylobacter fetus subspecies isolated from sheath wash. WVJ 2020; 10:465–480 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Gorkiewicz G, Kienesberger S, Schober C, Scheicher SR, Gülly C et al. A genomic island defines subspecies-specific virulence features of the host-adapted pathogen Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. J Bacteriol 2010; 192:502–517 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Nadin-Davis SA, Chmara J, Carrillo CD, Amoako K, Goji N et al. A comparison of fourteen fully characterized mammalian-associated Campylobacter fetus isolates suggests that loss of defense mechanisms contribute to high genomic plasticity and subspecies evolution. PeerJ 2021; 9:e10586 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Foynes S, Dorrell N, Ward SJ, Stabler RA, McColm AA et al. Helicobacter pylori possesses two CheY response regulators and a histidine kinase sensor, CheA, which are essential for chemotaxis and colonization of the gastric mucosa. Infect Immun 2000; 68:2016–2023 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Bolton DJ. Campylobacter virulence and survival factors. Food Microbiol 2015; 48:99–108 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. LaGier MJ, Bilokopytov I, Cockerill B, Threadgill DS. Identification and characterization of a putative chemotaxis protein, CheY, from the oral pathogen Campylobacter rectus. Internet J Microbiol 2014; 12:21300 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Majumdar S, Pal S. Cross- species communication in bacterial world. J Cell Commun Signal 2017; 11:187–190 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Miller RS, Sweeney SJ, Slootmaker C, Grear DA, Di Salvo PA et al. Cross-species transmission potential between wild pigs, livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans: implications for disease risk management in North America. Sci Rep 2017; 7:7821 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001446
Loading
Genomic insights into the diversity, antimicrobial resistance and zoonotic potential of Campylobacter fetus across diverse hosts and geographies
M Gen 11, 001446 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001446
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001446
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001446
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error