Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The Candidate Phyla Radiation, also known as , represents a vast and diverse division of bacteria that has come to light via culture-independent ‘omics’ technologies. Their limited biosynthetic capacity, along with evidence of their growth as obligate epibionts on other bacteria, suggests a broad reliance on host organisms for their survival. Nevertheless, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing their metabolism and lifestyle remains limited. The type IV secretion system (T4SS) represents a superfamily of translocation systems with a wide range of functional roles. T4SS genes have been identified in the class as essential for their epibiotic growth. In this study, we used a comprehensive bioinformatics approach to investigate the diversity and distribution of T4SS within . The phylogenetic analysis of the T4SS signature protein VirB4 suggests that most of these proteins cluster into a distinct monophyletic group with a shared ancestry to the MPF class of T4SS. This class is found in the conjugative elements of , , and , indicating a possible horizontal gene transfer from these monoderm micro-organisms to . We identified additional T4SS components near , particularly those associated with the MPF class, as well as homologues of other T4SS classes, such as VirB2-like pilins, and observed their varied arrangements across different classes. The absence of a relaxase in most of these T4SS clusters suggests that the system has been co-opted for other functions in . The proximity of T4SS components to the origin of replication (gene ) in some suggests a potential mechanism for increased expression. The broad ubiquity of a phylogenetically distinct T4SS, combined with its chromosomal location, underscores the significance of T4SS in the biology of .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • UK Research and Innovation (Award EP/Y028384/1)
    • Principal Award Recipient: PedroJ Cabello-Yeves
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (Award 1011052332-CYANORUB)
    • Principal Award Recipient: PedroJ Cabello-Yeves
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Award PID2020-118052GB-I00)
    • Principal Award Recipient: FranciscoRodriguez-Valera
  • Ministerio de Universidades (Award FPU20/04579)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Maríadel Mar Quiñonero-Coronel
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Award MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2020-117923GB-I00)
    • Principal Award Recipient: M.Pilar Garcillán-Barcia
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001409
2025-05-23
2026-04-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/11/5/mgen001409.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001409&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Grohmann E, Christie PJ, Waksman G, Backert S. Type IV secretion in Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 2018; 107:455–471 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cabezón E, Ripoll-Rozada J, Peña A, de la Cruz F, Arechaga I. Towards an integrated model of bacterial conjugation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2015; 39:81–95 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. de la Cruz F, Frost LS, Meyer RJ, Zechner EL. Conjugative DNA metabolism in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2010; 34:18–40 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bienvenu A, Martinez E, Bonazzi M. Undercover agents of infection: the stealth strategies of T4SS-equipped bacterial pathogens. Toxins 2021; 13:713 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang J, Feng Y, Wang C, Srinivas S, Chen C et al. Pathogenic Streptococcus strains employ novel escape strategy to inhibit bacteriostatic effect mediated by mammalian peptidoglycan recognition protein. Cell Microbiol 2017; 19:e12724 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiang X, Yang Y, Zhou J, Zhu L, Gu Y et al. Roles of the putative type IV-like secretion system key component VirD4 and PrsA in pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis type 2. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2016; 6:172 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhao Y, Liu G, Li S, Wang M, Song J et al. Role of a type IV–like secretion system of Streptococcus suis 2 in the development of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. J Infect Dis 2011; 204:274–281 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Souza DP, Oka GU, Alvarez-Martinez CE, Bisson-Filho AW, Dunger G et al. Bacterial killing via a type IV secretion system. Nat Commun 2015; 6:6453 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shen X, Wang B, Yang N, Zhang L, Shen D et al. Lysobacter enzymogenes antagonizes soilborne bacteria using the type IV secretion system. Environ Microbiol 2021; 23:4673–4688 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bayer-Santos E, Cenens W, Matsuyama BY, Oka GU, Di Sessa G et al. The opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia utilizes a type IV secretion system for interbacterial killing. PLoS Pathog 2019; 15:e1007651 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Purtschert-Montenegro G, Cárcamo-Oyarce G, Pinto-Carbó M, Agnoli K, Bailly A et al. Pseudomonas putida mediates bacterial killing, biofilm invasion and biocontrol with a type IVB secretion system. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:1547–1557 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamilton HL, Domínguez NM, Schwartz KJ, Hackett KT, Dillard JP. Neisseria gonorrhoeae secretes chromosomal DNA via a novel type IV secretion system. Mol Microbiol 2005; 55:1704–1721 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hofreuter D, Odenbreit S, Haas R. Natural transformation competence in Helicobacter pylori is mediated by the basic components of a type IV secretion system. Mol Microbiol 2001; 41:379–391 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Li YG, Hu B, Christie PJ. Biological and structural diversity of type IV secretion systems. Microbiol Spectr 2019; 7: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. van Wolferen M, Wagner A, van der Does C, Albers S-V. The archaeal Ced system imports DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113:2496–2501 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Beltran LC, Cvirkaite-Krupovic V, Miller J, Wang F, Kreutzberger MAB et al. Archaeal DNA-import apparatus is homologous to bacterial conjugation machinery. Nat Commun 2023; 14:666 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ajon M, Fröls S, van Wolferen M, Stoecker K, Teichmann D et al. UV-inducible DNA exchange in hyperthermophilic archaea mediated by type IV pili. Mol Microbiol 2011; 82:807–817 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Brown CT, Hug LA, Thomas BC, Sharon I, Castelle CJ et al. Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria. Nature 2015; 523:208–211 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Coleman GA, Davín AA, Mahendrarajah TA, Szánthó LL, Spang A et al. A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution. Science 2021; 372:eabe0511 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:996–1004 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wrighton KC, Thomas BC, Sharon I, Miller CS, Castelle CJ et al. Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla. Science 2012; 337:1661–1665 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tian R, Ning D, He Z, Zhang P, Spencer SJ et al. Small and mighty: adaptation of superphylum Patescibacteria to groundwater environment drives their genome simplicity. Microbiome 2020; 8:51 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Castelle CJ, Brown CT, Anantharaman K, Probst AJ, Huang RH et al. Biosynthetic capacity, metabolic variety and unusual biology in the CPR and DPANN radiations. Nat Rev Microbiol 2018; 16:629–645 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Chiriac M-C, Bulzu P-A, Andrei A-S, Okazaki Y, Nakano S-I et al. Ecogenomics sheds light on diverse lifestyle strategies in freshwater CPR. Microbiome 2022; 10:84 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. He X, McLean JS, Edlund A, Yooseph S, Hall AP et al. Cultivation of a human-associated TM7 phylotype reveals a reduced genome and epibiotic parasitic lifestyle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112:244–249 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Bor B, Collins AJ, Murugkar PP, Balasubramanian S, To TT et al. Insights obtained by culturing Saccharibacteria with their bacterial hosts. J Dent Res 2020; 99:685–694 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Batinovic S, Rose JJA, Ratcliffe J, Seviour RJ, Petrovski S. Cocultivation of an ultrasmall environmental parasitic bacterium with lytic ability against bacteria associated with wastewater foams. Nat Microbiol 2021; 6:703–711 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ibrahim A, Maatouk M, Rajaonison A, Zgheib R, Haddad G et al. Adapted protocol for Saccharibacteria cocultivation: two new members join the club of Candidate Phyla Radiation. Microbiol Spectr 2021; 9:e0106921 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Bor B, McLean JS, Foster KR, Cen L, To TT et al. Rapid evolution of decreased host susceptibility drives a stable relationship between ultrasmall parasite TM7x and its bacterial host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:12277–12282 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nie J, Utter DR, Kerns KA, Lamont EI, Hendrickson EL et al. Strain-level variation and diverse host bacterial responses in episymbiotic Saccharibacteria. mSystems 2022; 7: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Xie B, Wang J, Nie Y, Tian J, Wang Z et al. Type IV pili trigger episymbiotic association of Saccharibacteria with its bacterial host. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2022; 119:e2215990119 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Yakimov MM, Merkel AY, Gaisin VA, Pilhofer M, Messina E et al. Cultivation of a vampire: ‘Candidatus Absconditicoccus praedator’. Environ Microbiol 2022; 24:30–49 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Moreira D, Zivanovic Y, López-Archilla AI, Iniesto M, López-García P. Reductive evolution and unique predatory mode in the CPR bacterium Vampirococcus lugosii. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2454 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Cross KL, Campbell JH, Balachandran M, Campbell AG, Cooper CJ et al. Targeted isolation and cultivation of uncultivated bacteria by reverse genomics. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:1314–1321 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kuroda K, Yamamoto K, Nakai R, Hirakata Y, Kubota K et al. Symbiosis between Candidatus Patescibacteria and archaea discovered in wastewater-treating bioreactors. mBio 2022; 13:e0171122 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McLean JS, Bor B, Kerns KA, Liu Q, To TT et al. Acquisition and adaptation of ultra-small parasitic reduced genome bacteria to mammalian hosts. Cell Rep 2020; 32:107939 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang Y, Gallagher LA, Andrade PA, Liu A, Humphreys IR et al. Genetic manipulation of Patescibacteria provides mechanistic insights into microbial dark matter and the epibiotic lifestyle. Cell 2023; 186:4803–4817 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Cabello‐Yeves PJ, Zemskaya TI, Zakharenko AS, Sakirko MV, Ivanov VG et al. Rodriguez‐Valera, Microbiome of the deep Lake Baikal, a unique oxic bathypelagic habitat. Limnol Oceanogr 2020; 65:1471–1488 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Haro-Moreno JM, Cabello-Yeves PJ, Garcillán-Barcia MP, Zakharenko A, Zemskaya TI et al. A novel and diverse group of Candidatus Patescibacteria from bathypelagic Lake Baikal revealed through long-read metagenomics. Environ Microbiome 2023; 18:12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. Gtdb-tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:1925–1927 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Guglielmini J, Néron B, Abby SS, Garcillán-Barcia MP, de la Cruz F et al. Key components of the eight classes of type IV secretion systems involved in bacterial conjugation or protein secretion. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:5715–5727 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 2011; 7:e1002195 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Garcillán-Barcia MP, Redondo-Salvo S, Vielva L, de la Cruz F. MOBscan: automated annotation of MOB relaxases. In de la Cruz F. eds Horizontal Gene Transfer. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2075 New York, NY: Humana; 2020 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 2010; 59:307–321 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Paradis E, Schliep K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 2019; 35:526–528 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V et al. RefSeq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D1020–D1028 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Steinegger M, Söding J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35:1026–1028 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Steinegger M, Meier M, Mirdita M, Vöhringer H, Haunsberger SJ et al. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinformatics 2019; 20:473 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Gilchrist CLM, Chooi Y-H. Clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics 2021; 37:2473–2475 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Guglielmini J, de la Cruz F, Rocha EPC. Evolution of conjugation and type IV secretion systems. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:315–331 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Alvarez-Martinez CE, Christie PJ. Biological diversity of prokaryotic type IV secretion systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009; 73:775–808 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Méheust R, Burstein D, Castelle CJ, Banfield JF. The distinction of CPR bacteria from other bacteria based on protein family content. Nat Commun 2019; 10:4173 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Luef B, Frischkorn KR, Wrighton KC, Holman H-YN, Birarda G et al. Diverse uncultivated ultra-small bacterial cells in groundwater. Nat Commun 2015; 6:6372 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Gillespie JJ, Phan IQH, Driscoll TP, Guillotte ML, Lehman SS et al. The Rickettsia type IV secretion system: unrealized complexity mired by gene family expansion. Pathog Dis 2016; 74:ftw058 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Llosa M, Alkorta I. “Coupling Proteins in Type IV Secretion” in (2017); http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-75241-9_6, pp. 143–168.
  62. Christie PJ, Whitaker N, González-Rivera C. Mechanism and structure of the bacterial type IV secretion systems. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Cell Res 2014; 1843:1578–1591 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Bhatty M, Laverde Gomez JA, Christie PJ. The expanding bacterial type IV secretion lexicon. Res Microbiol 2013; 164:620–639 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Mossey P, Hudacek A, Das A. Agrobacterium tumefaciens type IV secretion protein VirB3 is an inner membrane protein and requires VirB4, VirB7, and VirB8 for stabilization. J Bacteriol 2010; 192:2830–2838 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Batchelor RA, Pearson BM, Friis LM, Guerry P, Wells JM. Nucleotide sequences and comparison of two large conjugative plasmids from different Campylobacter species. Microbiology 2004; 150:3507–3517 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Strauch E, Goelz G, Knabner D, Konietzny A, Lanka E et al. A cryptic plasmid of Yersinia enterocolitica encodes a conjugative transfer system related to the regions of CloDF13 Mob and IncX Pil. Microbiology 2003; 149:2829–2845 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Judd PK, Mahli D, Das A. Molecular characterization of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA transfer protein VirB6. Microbiology 2005; 151:3483–3492 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Goessweiner-Mohr N, Grumet L, Arends K, Pavkov-Keller T, Gruber CC et al. The 2.5 Å structure of the enterococcus conjugation protein TraM resembles VirB8 type IV secretion proteins. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:2018–2028 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Fercher C, Probst I, Kohler V, Goessweiner-Mohr N, Arends K et al. VirB8-like protein TraH is crucial for DNA transfer in Enterococcus faecalis. Sci Rep 2016; 6:24643 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Jäger F, Lamy A, Sun W-S, Guerini N, Berntsson R-A. Structure of the enterococcal T4SS protein PrgL reveals unique dimerization interface in the VirB8 protein family. Structure 2022; 30:876–885 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Zahrl D, Wagner M, Bischof K, Bayer M, Zavecz B et al. Peptidoglycan degradation by specialized lytic transglycosylases associated with type III and type IV secretion systems. Microbiology 2005; 151:3455–3467 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Arends K, Celik E-K, Probst I, Goessweiner-Mohr N, Fercher C et al. TraG encoded by the pIP501 type IV secretion system is a two-domain peptidoglycan-degrading enzyme essential for conjugative transfer. J Bacteriol 2013; 195:4436–4444 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Guglielmetti S, Balzaretti S, Taverniti V, Miriani M, Milani C et al. TgaA, a VirB1-like component belonging to a putative type IV secretion system of Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014; 80:5161–5169 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhong Q, Zhao Y, Chen T, Yin S, Yao X et al. A functional peptidoglycan hydrolase characterized from T4SS in 89K pathogenicity island of epidemic Streptococcus suis serotype 2. BMC Microbiol 2014; 14:73 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Laverde Gomez JA, Bhatty M, Christie PJ. PrgK, a multidomain peptidoglycan hydrolase, is essential for conjugative transfer of the pheromone-responsive plasmid pcf10. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:527–539 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Sun W-S, Torrens G, Ter Beek J, Cava F, Berntsson RP-A. Breaking barriers: pCF10 type 4 secretion system relies on a self-regulating muramidase to modulate the cell wall. mBio 2024; 15:e0048824 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Rivera-Calzada A, Fronzes R, Savva CG, Chandran V, Lian PW et al. Structure of a bacterial type IV secretion core complex at subnanometre resolution. EMBO J 2013; 32:1195–1204 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Grohmann E, Muth G, Espinosa M. Conjugative plasmid transfer in gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003; 67:277–301 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Kohler V, Keller W, Grohmann E. Enterococcus adhesin PrgB facilitates type IV secretion by condensation of extracellular DNA. Mol Microbiol 2018; 109:263–267 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Komano T, Yoshida T, Narahara K, Furuya N. The transfer region of IncI1 plasmid R64: similarities between R64 tra and legionella icm/dot genes. Mol Microbiol 2000; 35:1348–1359 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Seubert A, Hiestand R, de la Cruz F, Dehio C. A bacterial conjugation machinery recruited for pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol 2003; 49:1253–1266 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Nystedt B, Frank AC, Thollesson M, Andersson SGE. Diversifying selection and concerted evolution of a type IV secretion system in Bartonella. Mol Biol Evol 2008; 25:287–300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Vayssier-Taussat M, Le Rhun D, Deng HK, Biville F, Cescau S et al. The Trw type IV secretion system of Bartonella mediates host-specific adhesion to erythrocytes. PLoS Pathog 2010; 6:e1000946 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Al-Khedery B, Lundgren AM, Stuen S, Granquist EG, Munderloh UG et al. Structure of the type IV secretion system in different strains of Anaplasma phagocytophilum. BMC Genomics 2012; 13:678 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Messer W. The bacterial replication initiator DnaA. DnaA and oriC, the bacterial mode to initiate DNA replication. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2002; 26:355–374 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Couturier E, Rocha EPC. Replication-associated gene dosage effects shape the genomes of fast-growing bacteria but only for transcription and translation genes. Mol Microbiol 2006; 59:1506–1518 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Rocha EPC. The organization of the bacterial genome. Annu Rev Genet 2008; 42:211–233 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Schmid MB, Roth JR. Gene location affects expression level in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 1987; 169:2872–2875 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Sousa C, de Lorenzo V, Cebolla A. Modulation of gene expression through chromosomal positioning in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 1997; 143:2071–2078 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Sharp PM, Shields DC, Wolfe KH, Li W-H. Chromosomal location and evolutionary rate variation in enterobacterial genes. Science 1989; 246:808–810 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Lato DF, Golding GB. Spatial patterns of gene expression in bacterial genomes. J Mol Evol 2020; 88:510–520 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Pountain AW, Jiang P, Yao T, Homaee E, Guan Y et al. Transcription-replication interactions reveal bacterial genome regulation. Nature 2024; 626:661–669 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Lobb B, Tremblay BJ-M, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Doxey AC. An assessment of genome annotation coverage across the bacterial tree of life. Microbial Genomics 2020; 6: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001409
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001409
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

Supplementary material 2

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error