Skip to content
1887

Abstract

National epidemiological investigations of microbial infections greatly benefit from the increased information gained by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in combination with standardized approaches for data sharing and analysis.

To evaluate the quality and accuracy of WGS data generated by different laboratories but analysed by joint pipelines to reach a national surveillance approach.

A national methicillin-resistant (MRSA) collection of 20 strains was distributed to nine participating laboratories that performed in-house procedures for WGS. Raw data were shared and analysed by three pipelines: 1928 Diagnostics, JASEN (GMS pipeline) and CLC-Genomics Workbench. The outcomes were compared according to quality, correct strain identification and genetic distances.

One isolate contained intraspecies contamination and was excluded from further analysis. The mean sequencing depth varied between sites and technologies. However, all analysis methods identified 12 strains that belonged to one of five outbreak clusters. The cut-off definition was set to <10 allele differences for core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) and <20 genetic differences for SNP analysis in a pairwise comparison.

MRSA isolates, which are whole genome sequenced by different laboratories and analysed using the same bioinformatic pipelines, yielded comparable results for outbreak clustering for both cgMLST and SNP, using the 1928 analysis pipeline. In this study, JASEN was best suited to analyse Illumina data and CLC to analyse within respective technology. In the future, real-time sharing of data and harmonized analysis within the Genomic Medicine Sweden consortium will further facilitate investigations of outbreaks and transmission routes.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • VINNOVA (Award 2021-03660)
    • Principal Award Recipient: NotApplicable
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001331
2025-01-27
2025-12-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/11/1/mgen001331.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001331&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Annual Epidemiological Report for 2019- Healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units. In ECDC. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2018 Stockholm: ECDC; 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Global antimicrobial resistance and use surveillance system (GLASS) report 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Geneva: world health organization; 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrasa-Villar JI, Aibar-Remón C, Prieto-Andrés P, Mareca-Doñate R, Moliner-Lahoz J. Impact on morbidity, mortality, and length of stay of hospital-acquired infections by resistant microorganisms. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:644–652 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Egli A, Blanc DS, Greub G, Keller PM, Lazarevic V et al. Improving the quality and workflow of bacterial genome sequencing and analysis: paving the way for a Switzerland-wide molecular epidemiological surveillance platform. Swiss Med Wkly 2018; 148:w14693 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Raven KE, Blane B, Kumar N, Leek D, Bragin E et al. Defining metrics for whole-genome sequence analysis of MRSA in clinical practice. Microb Genom 2020; 6:e000354 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar N, Raven KE, Blane B, Leek D, Brown NM et al. Evaluation of a fully automated bioinformatics tool to predict antibiotic resistance from MRSA genomes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:1117–1122 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhong Y, Xu F, Wu J, Schubert J, Li MM. Application of next generation sequencing in laboratory medicine. Ann Lab Med 2021; 41:25–43 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Köser CU, Holden MTG, Ellington MJ, Cartwright EJP, Brown NM et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for investigation of a neonatal MRSA outbreak. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:2267–2275 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris SR, Cartwright EJ, Török ME, Holden MT, Brown NM et al. Whole-genome sequencing for analysis of an outbreak of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13:130–136 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eyre DW, Golubchik T, Gordon NC, Bowden R, Piazza P et al. A pilot study of rapid benchtop sequencing of Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile for outbreak detection and surveillance. BMJ Open 2012; 2:e001124 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Raven KE, Blane B, Leek D, Churcher C, Kokko-Gonzales P et al. Methodology for whole-genome sequencing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a routine hospital microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57:e00180-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Alaridah N, Hallbäck ET, Tångrot J, Winqvist N, Sturegård E et al. Transmission dynamics study of tuberculosis isolates with whole genome sequencing in southern Sweden. Sci Rep 2019; 9:4931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meehan CJ, Goig GA, Kohl TA, Verboven L, Dippenaar A et al. Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: current standards and open issues. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019; 17:533–545 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. The CRyPTIC Consortium Genome-wide association studies of global Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to 13 antimicrobials in 10,228 genomes identify new resistance mechanisms. PLoS Biol 2022; 20:e3001755 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sherry NL, Gorrie CL, Kwong JC, Higgs C, Stuart RL et al. Multi-site implementation of whole genome sequencing for hospital infection control: a prospective genomic epidemiological analysis. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2022; 23:100446 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Edsjö A, Friedman M, Rosenquist R. Genomic Medicine Sweden - a national initiative for the broad introduction of precision medicine in Swedish healthcare. Lakartidningen 2021; 118:21023 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Coolen JPM, Jamin C, Savelkoul PHM, Rossen JWA, Wertheim HFL et al. Centre-specific bacterial pathogen typing affects infection-control decision making. Microb Genom 2021; 7:000612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lagos AC, Sundqvist M, Dyrkell F, Stegger M, Söderquist B et al. Evaluation of within-host evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by comparing cgMLST and SNP analysis approaches. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10541 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Durand G, Javerliat F, Bes M, Veyrieras J-B, Guigon G et al. Routine whole-genome sequencing for outbreak investigations of Staphylococcus aureus in a National Reference Center. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:511 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Price JR, Golubchik T, Cole K, Wilson DJ, Crook DW et al. Whole-genome sequencing shows that patient-to-patient transmission rarely accounts for acquisition of Staphylococcus aureus in an Intensive Care Unit. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:609–618 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Griswold T, Kapsak C, Chen JC, den Bakker HC, Williams G et al. SneakerNet: a modular quality assurance and quality check workflow for primary genomic and metagenomic read data. J Open Source Softw 2021; 6: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Silva M, Machado MP, Silva DN, Rossi M, Moran-Gilad J et al. chewBBACA: a complete suite for gene-by-gene schema creation and strain identification. Microb Genom 2018; 4:e000166 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Leopold SR, Goering RV, Witten A, Harmsen D, Mellmann A. Bacterial whole-genome sequencing revisited: portable, scalable, and standardized analysis for typing and detection of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:2365–2370 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhou Z, Alikhan N-F, Sergeant MJ, Luhmann N, Vaz C et al. GrapeTree: visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome Res 2018; 28:1395–1404 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Werner A, Mölling P, Fagerström A, Dyrkell F, Arnellos D et al. Whole genome sequencing of Clostridioides difficile PCR ribotype 046 suggests transmission between pigs and humans. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244227 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cunningham SA, Chia N, Jeraldo PR, Quest DJ, Johnson JA et al. Comparison of whole-genome sequencing methods for analysis of three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol 2017; 55:1946–1953 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Madigan T, Cunningham SA, Patel R, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Barth JE et al. Whole-genome sequencing for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreak investigation in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018; 39:1412–1418 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Moura A, Criscuolo A, Pouseele H, Maury MM, Leclercq A et al. Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. Nat Microbiol 2016; 2:16185 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Uelze L, Grützke J, Borowiak M, Hammerl JA, Juraschek K et al. Typing methods based on whole genome sequencing data. One Health Outlook 2020; 2:3 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Uelze L, Borowiak M, Bönn M, Brinks E, Deneke C et al. German-wide interlaboratory study compares consistency, accuracy and reproducibility of whole-genome short read sequencing. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:573972 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Foster-Nyarko E, Cottingham H, Wick RR, Judd LM, Lam MMC et al. Nanopore-only assemblies for genomic surveillance of the global priority drug-resistant pathogen, Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb Genom 2023; 9:mgen000936 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sereika M, Kirkegaard RH, Karst SM, Michaelsen TY, Sørensen EA et al. Oxford Nanopore R10.4 long-read sequencing enables the generation of near-finished bacterial genomes from pure cultures and metagenomes without short-read or reference polishing. Nat Methods 2022; 19:823–826 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001331
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001331
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error