1887

Abstract

Despite being a major human pathogen, limited studies have reported RNA modifications in . These post-transcriptional modifications play crucial regulatory roles in bacteria and have also been shown to modulate bacterial virulence. Using nanopore sequencing, we characterized RNA modifications in a virulent strain (Ab-C98) under free-living (mid-exponential phase culture) and during an early stage of infection (3 h post-infection) in larvae. Analysis revealed that mC methylations are essential for ribosome synthesis, while mA and Ψ are involved in metabolic pathways and translation processes. Iron-chelating genes (mC and mA) and (mA and Ψ) and RNA polymerase subunit (mA and Ψ) were selectively modified during infection. This first transcriptome-wide study highlights the potential regulatory roles of mC, mA and Ψ modifications in during infection.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001327
2024-11-20
2024-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/10/11/mgen001327.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001327&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Höfer K, Jäschke A. Epitranscriptomics: RNA modifications in bacteria and archaea. Microbiol Spectr 2018; 6: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Khan A, Hu Y, Khan S. Pseudouridine in RNA: enzymatic synthesis mechanisms and functional roles in molecular biology. IJEAB 2023; 8:284–300 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Koh CS, Sarin LP. Transfer RNA modification and infection - Implications for pathogenicity and host responses. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 2018; 1861:419–432 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Urbonavicius J, Durand JMB, Björk GR. Three modifications in the D and T arms of tRNA influence translation in Escherichia coli and expression of virulence genes in Shigella flexneri. J Bacteriol 2002; 184:5348–5357 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang Y, Lu L, Li X. Detection technologies for RNA modifications. Exp Mol Med 2022; 54:1601–1616 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Marinov GK. On the design and prospects of direct RNA sequencing. Brief Funct Genomics 2017; 16:326–335 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jordan MR, Gonzalez-Gutierrez G, Trinidad JC, Giedroc DP. Metal retention and replacement in QueD2 protect queuosine-tRNA biosynthesis in metal-starved Acinetobacter baumannii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2213630119 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang W, Yao Y, Zhou H, He J, Wang J et al. Interactions between host epithelial cells and Acinetobacter baumannii promote the emergence of highly antibiotic resistant and highly mucoid strains. Emerg Microbes Infect 2022; 11:2556–2569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McGuffey JC, Jackson-Litteken CD, Di Venanzio G, Zimmer AA, Lewis JM et al. The tRNA methyltransferase TrmB is critical for Acinetobacter baumannii stress responses and pulmonary infection. mBio 2023; 14:e0141623 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Muzahid NH, Hussain MH, Huët MAL, Dwiyanto J, Su TT et al. Molecular characterization and comparative genomic analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from the community and the hospital: an epidemiological study in Segamat, Malaysia. Microb Genom 2023; 9:mgen000977 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ten KE, Muzahid NH, Rahman S, Tan HS. Use of the waxworm Galleria mellonella larvae as an infection model to study Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283960 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ten KE, Rahman S, Tan HS. Transcriptomic insights into the virulence of Acinetobacter baumannii during infection: role of iron uptake and siderophore production genes. Microbiology 20242024 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang S, Zhang W, Katanski CD, Dersh D, Dai Q et al. Interferon inducible pseudouridine modification in human mRNA by quantitative nanopore profiling. Genome Biol 2021; 22:330 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stoiber M, Quick J, Egan R, Eun Lee J, Celniker S et al. De novo identification of DNA modifications enabled by genome-guided nanopore signal processing. Bioinformatics 2017 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Y, Jiang J, Ma J, Wei Z, Wang Y et al. DirectRMDB: a database of post-transcriptional RNA modifications unveiled from direct RNA sequencing technology. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:D106–D116 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:D638–D646 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sonia C, Anna D-T, Leszek PP et al. De novo basecalling of m6A modifications at single molecule and single nucleotide resolution. bioRxiv 20232023.11.13.566801
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pryszcz LP, Novoa EM. ModPhred: an integrative toolkit for the analysis and storage of nanopore sequencing DNA and RNA modification data. Bioinformatics 2021; 38:257–260 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bailey TL, Johnson J, Grant CE, Noble WS. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:W39–49 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sim N-L, Kumar P, Hu J, Henikoff S, Schneider G et al. SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:W452–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dai Q, Zhang L-S, Sun H-L, Pajdzik K, Yang L et al. Quantitative sequencing using BID-seq uncovers abundant pseudouridines in mammalian mRNA at base resolution. Nat Biotechnol 2023; 41:344–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang W, Eckwahl MJ, Zhou KI, Pan T. Sensitive and quantitative probing of pseudouridine modification in mRNA and long noncoding RNA. RNA 2019; 25:1218–1225 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fleming AM, Bommisetti P, Xiao S, Bandarian V, Burrows CJ. Direct nanopore sequencing for the 17 RNA modification types in 36 locations in the E. coli ribosome enables monitoring of stress-dependent changes. ACS Chem Biol 2023; 18:2211–2223 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Anton BP, Raleigh EA. Complete genome sequence of NEB 5-alpha, a derivative of Escherichia coli K-12 DH5α. Genome Announc 2016; 4:e01245-16 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Andersen NM, Douthwaite S. YebU is a m5C methyltransferase specific for 16 S rRNA nucleotide 1407. J Mol Biol 2006; 359:777–786 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Trixl L, Lusser A. The dynamic RNA modification 5-methylcytosine and its emerging role as an epitranscriptomic mark. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2019; 10:e1510 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Edelheit S, Schwartz S, Mumbach MR, Wurtzel O, Sorek R. Transcriptome-wide mapping of 5-methylcytidine RNA modifications in bacteria, archaea, and yeast reveals m5C within archaeal mRNAs. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003602 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Maguire BA. Inhibition of bacterial ribosome assembly: a suitable drug target?. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009; 73:22–35 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Song H, Zhang J, Liu B, Xu J, Cai B et al. Biological roles of RNA m5C modification and its implications in cancer immunotherapy. Biomark Res 2022; 10:15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu X, Wei Q, Yang C, Zhao H, Xu J et al. RNA m5C modification upregulates E2F1 expression in a manner dependent on YBX1 phase separation and promotes tumor progression in ovarian cancer. Exp Mol Med 2024; 56:600–615 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schumann U, Zhang H-N, Sibbritt T, Pan A, Horvath A et al. Multiple links between 5-methylcytosine content of mRNA and translation. BMC Biol 2020; 18:40 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sergiev PV, Serebryakova MV, Bogdanov AA, Dontsova OA. The ybiN gene of Escherichia coli encodes adenine-N6 methyltransferase specific for modification of A1618 of 23 S ribosomal RNA, a methylated residue located close to the ribosomal exit tunnel. J Mol Biol 2008; 375:291–300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Deng X, Chen K, Luo G-Z, Weng X, Ji Q et al. Widespread occurrence of N6-methyladenosine in bacterial mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:6557–6567 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Cook-Libin S, Sykes EME, Kornelsen V, Kumar A. Iron acquisition mechanisms and their role in the virulence of Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect Immun 2022; 90:e0022322 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gilbert WV. Recent developments, opportunities, and challenges in the study of mRNA pseudouridylation. RNA 2024; 30:530–536 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Petrov DP, Kaiser S, Kaiser S, Jung K. Opportunities and challenges to profile mRNA modifications in Escherichia coli. Chembiochem 2022; 23:e202200270 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Li X, Zhu P, Ma S, Song J, Bai J et al. Chemical pulldown reveals dynamic pseudouridylation of the mammalian transcriptome. Nat Chem Biol 2015; 11:592–597 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Cappannini A, Ray A, Purta E, Mukherjee S, Boccaletto P et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modifications and related information. 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:D239–D244 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Bakin A, Kowalak JA, McCloskey JA, Ofengand J. The single pseudouridine residue in Escherichia coli 16S RNA is located at position 516. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:3681–3684 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rubio Gomez MA, Ibba M. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. RNA 2020; 26:910–936 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ayush M. Diverse survival functions of secondary metabolites in nature. In Ramasamy V, Suresh Selvapuram Sudalaimuthu R. eds Secondary Metabolites Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2022 p Ch. 2
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Carlile TM, Rojas-Duran MF, Zinshteyn B, Shin H, Bartoli KM et al. Pseudouridine profiling reveals regulated mRNA pseudouridylation in yeast and human cells. Nature 2014; 515:143–146 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao BS, He C. Pseudouridine in a new era of RNA modifications. Cell Res 2015; 25:153–154 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Eyler DE, Franco MK, Batool Z, Wu MZ, Dubuke ML et al. Pseudouridinylation of mRNA coding sequences alters translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019; 116:23068–23074 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Heisler LM, Feng G, Jin DJ, Gross CA, Landick R. Amino acid substitutions in the two largest subunits of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase that suppress a defective Rho termination factor affect different parts of the transcription complex. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:14572–14583 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001327
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001327
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error