1887

Microbial Genomics logo

Volume 10, Issue 11

Delineating bacterial genera based on gene content analysis: a case study of the clade within the class Open Access

Abstract

Genome-based analysis allows for large-scale classification of diverse bacteria and has been widely adopted for delineating species. Unfortunately, for higher taxonomic ranks such as genus, establishing a generally accepted approach based on genome analysis is challenging. While core-genome phylogenies depict the evolutionary relationships among species, determining the correspondence between clades and genera may not be straightforward. For genotypic divergence, the percentage of conserved proteins and genome-wide average amino acid identity are commonly used, but often do not provide a clear threshold for classification. In this work, we investigated the utility of global comparisons and data visualization in identifying clusters of species based on their overall gene content and rationalized that such patterns can be integrated with phylogeny and other information such as phenotypes for improving taxonomy. As a proof of concept, we selected 177 representative genome sequences from the clade within the class for a case study. We found that the clustering patterns corresponded to the current understanding of these organisms, namely the split into three above-genus groups: Hominis, Pneumoniae and –Mycoides. However, at the genus level, several important issues were found. For example, recent taxonomic revisions that split the Hominis group into three genera and into five genera are problematic, as those newly described or emended genera lack clear differentiations in gene content from one another. Moreover, several cases of misclassification were identified. These findings demonstrated the utility of this approach and its potential application to other bacteria.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): gene content , genome , genus , Mollicutes , Mycoplasma and taxonomy
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Academia Sinica
    • Principle Award Recipient: Chih-HorngKuo
© 2024 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001321
2024-11-15
2024-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/10/11/mgen001321.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001321&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Konstantinidis KT. Sequence-discrete species for prokaryotes and other microbes: a historical perspective and pending issues. mLife 2023; 2:341–349 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:2567–2572 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Medlar AJ, Törönen P, Holm L. AAI-profiler: fast proteome-wide exploratory analysis reveals taxonomic identity, misclassification and contamination. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W479–W485 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Tully JG, Bové JM, Laigret F, Whitcomb RF. Revised taxonomy of the class Mollicutes: proposed elevation of a monophyletic cluster of arthropod-associated Mollicutes to ordinal rank (Entomoplasmatales ord. nov.), with provision for familial rank to separate species with nonhelical morphology (Entomoplasmataceae fam. nov.) from helical species (Spiroplasmataceae), and emended descriptions of the order Mycoplasmatales, family Mycoplasmataceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:378–385 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown DR, May M, Bradbury JM, Johansson K-E. Mollicutes. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Bergey’s Manual Trust; pp 1–11
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown DR, Bradbury JM, Johansson K-E. Anaeroplasma. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; pp 1–5
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown DR, Bradbury JM, Johansson K-E. Acholeplasma. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; pp 1–13
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bertaccini A, Arocha-Rosete Y, Contaldo N, Duduk B, Fiore N et al. Revision of the ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ species description guidelines. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005353 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown DR, May M, Bradbury JM, Balish MF, Calcutt MJ et al. Mycoplasma. In Whitman WB. ed Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Wiley; pp 1–78
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gasparich GE, Kuo C-H, Foissac X. Spiroplasma. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Bergey’s Manual Trust; pp 1–52
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gasparich GE, Kuo C-H. Genome analysis-based union of the genus Mesoplasma with the genus Entomoplasma. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2735–2738 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lo W-S, Gasparich GE, Kuo C-H. Convergent evolution among ruminant-pathogenic mycoplasma involved extensive gene content changes. Genome Biol Evol 2018; 10:2130–2139 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grosjean H, Breton M, Sirand-Pugnet P, Tardy F, Thiaucourt F et al. Predicting the minimal translation apparatus: lessons from the reductive evolution of mollicutes. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004363 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gupta RS, Sawnani S, Adeolu M, Alnajar S, Oren A. Phylogenetic framework for the phylum Tenericutes based on genome sequence data: proposal for the creation of a new order Mycoplasmoidales ord. nov., containing two new families Mycoplasmoidaceae fam. nov. and Metamycoplasmataceae fam. nov. harbouring Eperythrozoon, Ureaplasma and five novel genera. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2018; 111:1583–1630 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gupta RS, Son J, Oren A. A phylogenomic and molecular markers based taxonomic framework for members of the order Entomoplasmatales: proposal for an emended order Mycoplasmatales containing the family Spiroplasmataceae and emended family Mycoplasmataceae comprised of six genera. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:561–588 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Balish M, Bertaccini A, Blanchard A, Brown D, Browning G et al. Recommended rejection of the names Malacoplasma gen. nov., Mesomycoplasma gen. nov., Metamycoplasma gen. nov., Metamycoplasmataceae fam. nov., Mycoplasmoidaceae fam. nov., Mycoplasmoidales ord. nov., Mycoplasmoides gen. nov., Mycoplasmopsis gen. nov. [Gupta, Sawnani, Adeolu, Alnajar and Oren 2018] and all proposed species comb. nov. placed therein. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3650–3653 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Gupta RS, Oren A. Necessity and rationale for the proposed name changes in the classification of Mollicutes species. reply to: ‘Recommended rejection of the names Malacoplasma gen. nov., Mesomycoplasma gen. nov., Metamycoplasma gen. nov., Metamycoplasmataceae fam. nov., Mycoplasmoidaceae fam. nov., Mycoplasmoidales ord. nov., Mycoplasmoides gen. nov., Mycoplasmopsis gen. nov. [Gupta, Sawnani, Adeolu, Alnajar and Oren 2018] and all proposed species comb. nov. placed therein’, by M. Balish et al. (Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 2019;69:3650–3653). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1431–1438
     [Google Scholar]
  24. May M, Brown DR. International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Mollicutes: Minutes of the closed meeting, 8 July 2018, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, USA. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2169–2171 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucl Acids Res 2022; 50:D20–D26 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gasparich GE, Whitcomb RF, Dodge D, French FE, Glass J et al. The genus Spiroplasma and its non-helical descendants: phylogenetic classification, correlation with phenotype and roots of the Mycoplasma mycoides clade. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:893–918 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Chou L, Lin Y-C, Haryono M, Santos MNM, Cho S-T et al. Modular evolution of secretion systems and virulence plasmids in a bacterial species complex. BMC Biol 2022; 20:16 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A et al. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:W29–33 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 2003; 13:2178–2189 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kolde R. pheatmap; 2019 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html
  31. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing; 2019 https://www.r-project.org/
  32. Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P et al. vegan; 2022 https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan
  33. Popescu A-A, Huber KT, Paradis E. ape 3.0: New tools for distance-based phylogenetics and evolutionary analysis in R. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:1536–1537 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Wickham H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis New York, NY: Springer-Verlag New York; 2016 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1189–1191 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP - phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 1989; 5:164–166
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 2010; 59:307–321 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003; 19:1572–1574 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:W78–W82 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Aroh O, Liles MR, Halanych KM. Genomic characterization of a novel, widely distributed Mycoplasma species “Candidatus Mycoplasma mahonii” associated with the brittlestar Gorgonocephalus chilensis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290305 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ramírez AS, Vega-Orellana OM, Viver T, Poveda JB, Rosales RS et al. First description of two moderately halophilic and psychrotolerant Mycoplasma species isolated from cephalopods and proposal of Mycoplasma marinum sp. nov. and Mycoplasma todarodis sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2019; 42:457–467 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lo W-S, Gasparich GE, Kuo C-H. Found and lost: the fates of horizontally acquired genes in arthropod-symbiotic spiroplasma. Genome Biol Evol 2015; 7:2458–2472 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Tsai Y-M, Chang A, Kuo C-H. Horizontal gene acquisitions contributed to genome expansion in insect-symbiotic Spiroplasma clarkii. Genome Biol Evol 2018; 10:1526–1532 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sirand-Pugnet P, Lartigue C, Marenda M, Jacob D, Barré A et al. Being pathogenic, plastic, and sexual while living with a nearly minimal bacterial genome. PLoS Genet 2007; 3:e75 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:996–1004 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol 2020; 38:1079–1086 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Weng L-W, Lin Y-C, Su C-C, Huang C-T, Cho S-T et al. Complete genome sequence of Xylella taiwanensis and comparative analysis of virulence gene content with Xylella fastidiosa. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:684092 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Cho S-T, Kung H-J, Huang W, Hogenhout SA, Kuo C-H. Species boundaries and molecular markers for the classification of 16SRI phytoplasmas inferred by genome analysis. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:1531 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001321
Loading
Delineating bacterial genera based on gene content analysis: a case study of the Mycoplasmatales–Entomoplasmatales clade within the class Mollicutes
M Gen 10, 001321 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001321
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001321
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001321
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Supplementary material 3

EXCEL

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error