Skip to content
1887

Microbial Genomics logo Microbial Genomics

Volume 10, Issue 7

Mobile genetic element-driven genomic changes in a community-associated methicillin-resistant clone during its transmission in a regional community outbreak in Japan Open Access

Abstract

Community-associated methicillin-resistant (CA-MRSA) infections are now a public health concern in both community and healthcare settings worldwide. We previously identified a suspected case of a maternity clinic-centred outbreak of CA-MRSA skin infection in a regional community in Japan by PFGE-based analysis. In this study, we performed genome sequence-based analyses of 151 CA-MRSA isolates, which included not only outbreak-related isolates that we previously defined based on identical or similar PFGE patterns but also other isolates obtained during the same period in the same region. Our analysis accurately defined 133 isolates as outbreak-related isolates, collectively called the TDC clone. They belonged to a CA-MRSA lineage in clonal complex (CC) 30, known as the South West Pacific (SWP) clone. A high-resolution phylogenetic analysis of these isolates combined with their epidemiological data revealed that the TDC clone was already present and circulating in the region before the outbreak was recognized, and only the isolates belonging to two sublineages (named SL4 and SL5) were directly involved in the outbreak. Long persistence in patients/carriers and frequent intrahousehold transmission of the TDC clone were also revealed by this analysis. Moreover, by systematic analyses of the genome changes that occurred in this CA-MRSA clone during transmission in the community, we revealed that most variations were associated with mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Variant PFGE types were generated by alterations of prophages and genomic islands or insertion sequence (IS)-mediated insertion of a plasmid or a sequence of unknown origin. Dynamic changes in plasmid content, which were linked to changes in antimicrobial resistance profiles in specific isolates, were generated by frequent gain and loss of plasmids, most of which were self-transmissible or mobilizable. The introduction of IS by a plasmid (named pTDC02) into sublineage SL5 led to SL5-specific amplification of IS and amplified IS copies were involved in some of the structural changes of chromosomes and plasmids and generated variations in the repertoire of virulence-related genes in limited isolates. These data revealed how CA-MRSA genomes change during transmission in the community and how MGEs are involved in this process.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): community-associated Staphylococcus aureus , genomic change , mobile genetic element , outbreak and whole-genome sequencing analysis
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Kaibara Morikazu Medical Science Promotion Foundation
    • Principle Award Recipient: TetsuyaHayashi
© 2024 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001272
2024-07-17
2025-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/10/7/mgen001272.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001272&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lee AS, de Lencastre H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018; 4:18033 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, Eichenberger EM, Shah PP et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019; 17:203–218 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. David MZ, Daum RS. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23:616–687 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Lakhundi S, Zhang K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2018; 31:e00020-18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bal AM, Coombs GW, Holden MTG, Lindsay JA, Nimmo GR et al. Genomic insights into the emergence and spread of international clones of healthcare-, community- and livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: blurring of the traditional definitions. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2016; 6:95–101 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Coll F, Harrison EM, Toleman MS, Reuter S, Raven KE et al. Longitudinal genomic surveillance of MRSA in the UK reveals transmission patterns in hospitals and the community. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9:eaak9745 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Grumann D, Nübel U, Bröker BM. Staphylococcus aureus toxins--their functions and genetics. Infect Genet Evol 2014; 21:583–592 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Jamrozy D, Coll F, Mather AE, Harris SR, Harrison EM et al. Evolution of mobile genetic element composition in an epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: temporal changes correlated with frequent loss and gain events. BMC Genom 2017; 18:684 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Firth N, Jensen SO, Kwong SM, Skurray RA, Ramsay JP. Staphylococcal plasmids, transposable and integrative elements. Microbiol Spectr 2018; 6:6 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindsay JA. Staphylococci: evolving genomes. Microbiol Spectr 2019; 7:6 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Holden MTG, Hsu L-Y, Kurt K, Weinert LA, Mather AE et al. A genomic portrait of the emergence, evolution, and global spread of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pandemic. Genome Res 2013; 23:653–664 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Stanczak-Mrozek KI, Manne A, Knight GM, Gould K, Witney AA et al. Within-host diversity of MRSA antimicrobial resistances. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015; 70:2191–2198 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Tajiri A, Shimauchi C, Katahira K, Gotoh Y, Shigeta M et al. An outbreak of skin infection due to community acquired-MRSA that occurred among the women who gave birth in a maternity clinic and their families. Jpn J Dermatol 2018; 128:413–424
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Walker TM, Ip CLC, Harrell RH, Evans JT, Kapatai G et al. Whole-genome sequencing to delineate Mycobacterium tuberculosis outbreaks: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13:137–146 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Tong SYC, Holden MTG, Nickerson EK, Cooper BS, Köser CU et al. Genome sequencing defines phylogeny and spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a high transmission setting. Genome Res 2015; 25:111–118 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kajitani R, Toshimoto K, Noguchi H, Toyoda A, Ogura Y et al. Efficient de novo assembly of highly heterozygous genomes from whole-genome shotgun short reads. Genome Res 2014; 24:1384–1395 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005595 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:1037–1039 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:D32–D36 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W16–W21 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:119–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Adams MD, Bishop B, Wright MS. Quantitative assessment of insertion sequence impact on bacterial genome architecture. Microb Genom 2016; 2:e000062 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 2004; 5:R12 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gotoh Y, Taniguchi T, Yoshimura D, Katsura K, Saeki Y et al. Multi-step genomic dissection of a suspected intra-hospital Helicobacter cinaedi outbreak. Microb Genom 2018; 4:e000236 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Croucher NJ, Page AJ, Connor TR, Delaney AJ, Keane JA et al. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:e15 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2019; 35:4453–4455 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Darriba D, Posada D, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Morel B et al. ModelTest-NG: a new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:291–294 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W242–W245 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1754–1760 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Yoshimura D, Kajitani R, Gotoh Y, Katahira K, Okuno M et al. Evaluation of SNP calling methods for closely related bacterial isolates and a novel high-accuracy pipeline: BactSNP. Microb Genom 2019; 5:e000261 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain W1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 2012; 6:80–92 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Rambaut A, Lam TT, Max Carvalho L, Pybus OG. Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly Path-O-Gen). Virus Evol 2016; 2:vew007 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinform 2010; 11:595 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Feil EJ, Li BC, Aanensen DM, Hanage WP, Spratt BG. eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J Bacteriol 2004; 186:1518–1530 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Oliveira DC, Lencastre H, Zhang K et al. Classification of Staphylococcal cassette chromosome MEC (Sccmec): guidelines for reporting novel Sccmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53:4961–4967 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kaya H, Hasman H, Larsen J, Stegger M, Johannesen TB et al. SCCmecFinder, a web-based tool for typing of Staphylococcal cassette chromosomemecin Staphylococcus aureus using whole-genome sequence data. mSphere 2018; 3:e00612-17 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Bartels MD, Petersen A, Worning P, Nielsen JB, Larner-Svensson H et al. Comparing whole-genome sequencing with Sanger sequencing for spa typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:4305–4308 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Ohtsubo Y, Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, Nagata Y, Tsuda M. GenomeMatcher: a graphical user interface for DNA sequence comparison. BMC Bioinform 2008; 9:376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kajitani R, Yoshimura D, Ogura Y, Gotoh Y, Hayashi T et al. Platanus_B: an accurate de novo assembler for bacterial genomes using an iterative error-removal process. DNA Res 2020; 27:dsaa014 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:3895–3903 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ramsay JP, Kwong SM, Murphy RJT, Yui Eto K, Price KJ et al. An updated view of plasmid conjugation and mobilization in Staphylococcus. Mob Genet Elements 2016; 6:e1208317 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Inouye M, Dashnow H, Raven L-A, Schultz MB, Pope BJ et al. SRST2: rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome Med 2014; 6:90 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D517–D525 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Cafini F, Thi Le Thuy N, Román F, Prieto J, Dubrac S et al. Methodology for the study of horizontal gene transfer in Staphylococcus aureus. J Vis Exp 2017; 121:55087 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu B, Zheng D, Zhou S, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2022: a general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D912–D917 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Robinson DA, Kearns AM, Holmes A, Morrison D, Grundmann H et al. Re-emergence of early pandemic Staphylococcus aureus as a community-acquired meticillin-resistant clone. Lancet 2005; 365:1256–1258 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. McAdam PR, Templeton KE, Edwards GF, Holden MTG, Feil EJ et al. Molecular tracing of the emergence, adaptation, and transmission of hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:9107–9112 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Diep BA, Otto M. The role of virulence determinants in community-associated MRSA pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol 2008; 16:361–369 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Reuter S, Török ME, Holden MTG, Reynolds R, Raven KE et al. Building a genomic framework for prospective MRSA surveillance in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Genome Res 2016; 26:263–270 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Chuang YY, Huang YC. Molecular epidemiology of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13:698–708 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ward MJ, Goncheva M, Richardson E, McAdam PR, Raftis E et al. Identification of source and sink populations for the emergence and global spread of the East-Asia clone of community-associated MRSA. Genome Biol 2016; 17:160 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Coll F, Raven KE, Knight GM, Blane B, Harrison EM et al. Definition of a genetic relatedness cutoff to exclude recent transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a genomic epidemiology analysis. Lancet Microbe 2020; 1:e328–e335 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Baba T, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M, Yuzawa H, Aoki K et al. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet 2002; 359:1819–1827 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Holden MTG, Feil EJ, Lindsay JA, Peacock SJ, Day NPJ et al. Complete genomes of two clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains: evidence for the rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:9786–9791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Knox J, Uhlemann AC, Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections: transmission within households and the community. Trends Microbiol 2015; 23:437–444 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Knox J, Uhlemann AC, Lowy FD. Stopping household methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and recurrent infections: an unmet challenge. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:e4578–e4580 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Cook HA, Furuya EY, Larson E, Vasquez G, Lowy FD. Heterosexual transmission of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44:410–413 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Rowland SJ, Dyke KGH. Tn552, a novel transposable element from Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 1990; 4:961–975 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Byrne ME, Rouch DA, Skurray RA. Nucleotide sequence analysis of IS256 from the Staphylococcus aureus gentamicin-tobramycin-kanamycin-resistance transposon Tn4001. Gene 1989; 81:361–367 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Trzcinski K, Cooper BS, Hryniewicz W, Dowson CG. Expression of resistance to tetracyclines in strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 45:763–770 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Ji G, Silver S. Regulation and expression of the arsenic resistance operon from Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pI258. J Bacteriol 1992; 174:3684–3694 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  65. O’Brien FG, Yui Eto K, Murphy RJT, Fairhurst HM, Coombs GW et al. Origin-of-transfer sequences facilitate mobilisation of non-conjugative antimicrobial-resistance plasmids in Staphylococcus aureus. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:7971–7983 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Pollet RM, Ingle JD, Hymes JP, Eakes TC, Eto KY et al. Processing of nonconjugative resistance plasmids by conjugation nicking enzyme of Staphylococci. J Bacteriol 2016; 198:888–897 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Hisatsune J, Koizumi Y, Tanimoto K, Sugai M. Diversity and standard nomenclature of Staphylococcus aureus hyaluronate lyases HysA and HysB. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0052423 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001272
Loading
Mobile genetic element-driven genomic changes in a community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone during its transmission in a regional community outbreak in Japan
M Gen 10, 001272 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001272
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001272
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001272
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error