Skip to content
1887

Microbial Genomics logo Microbial Genomics

Volume 10, Issue 5

Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in wastewater: an assessment of nine computational tools using simulated genomic data Open Access

Abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) is an important epidemiological and public health tool for tracking pathogens across the scale of a building, neighbourhood, city, or region. WBS gained widespread adoption globally during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for estimating community infection levels by qPCR. Sequencing pathogen genes or genomes from wastewater adds information about pathogen genetic diversity, which can be used to identify viral lineages (including variants of concern) that are circulating in a local population. Capturing the genetic diversity by WBS sequencing is not trivial, as wastewater samples often contain a diverse mixture of viral lineages with real mutations and sequencing errors, which must be deconvoluted computationally from short sequencing reads. In this study we assess nine different computational tools that have recently been developed to address this challenge. We simulated 100 wastewater sequence samples consisting of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1, BA.2, and Delta lineages, in various mixtures, as well as a Delta–Omicron recombinant and a synthetic ‘novel’ lineage. Most tools performed well in identifying the true lineages present and estimating their relative abundances and were generally robust to variation in sequencing depth and read length. While many tools identified lineages present down to 1 % frequency, results were more reliable above a 5 % threshold. The presence of an unknown synthetic lineage, which represents an unclassified SARS-CoV-2 lineage, increases the error in relative abundance estimates of other lineages, but the magnitude of this effect was small for most tools. The tools also varied in how they labelled novel synthetic lineages and recombinants. While our simulated dataset represents just one of many possible use cases for these methods, we hope it helps users understand potential sources of error or bias in wastewater sequencing analysis and to appreciate the commonalities and differences across methods.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): benchmark , environmental , SARS-CoV-2 , sequencing , surveillance and wastewater
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
© 2024 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001249
2024-05-24
2025-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/10/5/mgen001249.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001249&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Choi PM, Tscharke BJ, Donner E, O’Brien JW, Grant SC et al. Wastewater-based epidemiology biomarkers: past, present and future. TrAC Trends Anal Chemist 2018; 105:453–469 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Sims N, Kasprzyk-Hordern B. Future perspectives of wastewater-based epidemiology: monitoring infectious disease spread and resistance to the community level. Environ Int 2020; 139:105689 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Naughton CC, Roman FA, Alvarado AGF, Tariqi AQ, Deeming MA et al. Show us the data: global COVID-19 wastewater monitoring efforts, equity, and gaps. Public and Global Health 2021 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Tang A, Tong Z-D, Wang H-L, Dai Y-X, Li K-F et al. Detection of novel coronavirus by RT-PCR in stool specimen from asymptomatic child, China. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26:1337–1339 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Y, Chen L, Deng Q, Zhang G, Wu K et al. The presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA in the feces of COVID‐19 patients. J Med Virol 2020; 92:833–840 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu Y, Guo C, Tang L, Hong Z, Zhou J et al. Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:434–435 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Xiao F, Sun J, Xu Y, Li F, Huang X et al. Infectious SARS-CoV-2 in Feces of Patient with Severe COVID-19. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26:1920–1922 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ciannella S, González-Fernández C, Gomez-Pastora J. Recent progress on wastewater-based epidemiology for COVID-19 surveillance: A systematic review of analytical procedures and epidemiological modeling. Sci Total Environ 2023; 878:162953 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Wolfe M, Hughes B, Duong D, Chan-Herur V, Wigginton KR et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants Mu, Beta, Gamma, Lambda, Delta, Alpha, and Omicron in wastewater settled solids using mutation-specific assays is associated with regional detection of variants in clinical samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 2022; 88:e00045-22 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Karthikeyan S, Levy JI, De Hoff P, Humphrey G, Birmingham A et al. Wastewater sequencing reveals early cryptic SARS-CoV-2 variant transmission. Nature 2022; 609:101–108 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Xu X, Deng Y, Ding J, Zheng X, Li S et al. Real-time allelic assays of SARS-CoV-2 variants to enhance sewage surveillance. Water Res 2022; 220:118686 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cancela F, Ramos N, Smyth DS, Etchebehere C, Berois M et al. Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 genomic populations on a country-wide scale through targeted sequencing. PLoS ONE 2023; 18:e0284483 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuroiwa M, Gahara Y, Kato H, Morikawa Y, Matsui Y et al. Targeted amplicon sequencing of wastewater samples for detecting SARS-CoV-2 variants with high sensitivity and resolution. Sci Total Environ 2023; 893:164766 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. La Rosa G, Brandtner D, Bonanno Ferraro G, Veneri C, Mancini P et al. Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants in October-November 2022 in Italy: detection of XBB.1, BA.2.75 and rapid spread of the BQ.1 lineage. Sci Total Environ 2023; 873:162339 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Sutton M, Radniecki TS, Kaya D, Alegre D, Geniza M et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 (Beta) variant through wastewater surveillance before case detection in a community, Oregon, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:1101–1109 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Manuel D, Amadei CA, Campbell JR, Brault J-M, Veillard J. Strengthening Public Health Surveillance through Wastewater Testing: An Essential Investment for the COVID-19 Pandemic and Future Health Threats (English) Washington, DC: World Bank; 2022
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Wölfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature 2020; 581:465–469 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Trottier J, Darques R, Ait Mouheb N, Partiot E, Bakhache W et al. Post-lockdown detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the wastewater of Montpellier, France. One Health 2020; 10:100157 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. McMinn BR, Korajkic A, Pemberton AC, Kelleher J, Ahmed W et al. Assessment of two volumetrically different concentration approaches to improve sensitivities for SARS-CoV-2 detection during wastewater monitoring. J Virol Methods 2023; 311:114645 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Wigginton KR, Ye Y, Ellenberg RM. Emerging investigators series: the source and fate of pandemic viruses in the urban water cycle. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol 2015; 1:735–746 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Parra-Arroyo L, Martínez-Ruiz M, Lucero S, Oyervides-Muñoz MA, Wilkinson M et al. Degradation of viral RNA in wastewater complex matrix models and other standards for wastewater-based epidemiology: a review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2023; 158:116890 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bertels X, Demeyer P, Van den Bogaert S, Boogaerts T, van Nuijs ALN et al. Factors influencing SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater up to the sampling stage: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ 2022; 820:153290 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu F, Lee WL, Chen H, Gu X, Chandra F et al. Making waves: wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in an endemic future. Water Res 2022; 219:118535 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Crits-Christoph A, Kantor RS, Olm MR, Whitney ON, Al-Shayeb B et al. Genome sequencing of sewage detects regionally prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variants. mBio 2021; 12:e02703-20 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu X, Deng Y, Ding J, Zheng X, Wang C et al. Wastewater genomic sequencing for SARS-CoV-2 variants surveillance in wastewater-based epidemiology applications. Water Res 2023; 244:120444 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Agrawal S, Orschler L, Lackner S. Metatranscriptomic analysis reveals SARS-CoV-2 mutations in wastewater of the Frankfurt metropolitan area in southern Germany. Microbiol Resour Announc 2021; 10:00280–21 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Novoa B, Ríos-Castro R, Otero-Muras I, Gouveia S, Cabo A et al. Wastewater and marine bioindicators surveillance to anticipate COVID-19 prevalence and to explore SARS-CoV-2 diversity by next generation sequencing: one-year study. Sci Total Environ 2022; 833:155140 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith MF, Holland SC, Lee MB, Hu JC, Pham NC et al. Baseline sequencing surveillance of public clinical testing, hospitals, and community wastewater reveals rapid emergence of SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant of concern in Arizona, USA. mBio 2023; 14:e03101-22 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Rios G, Lacoux C, Leclercq V, Diamant A, Lebrigand K et al. Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 variants alterations in Nice neighborhoods by wastewater nanopore sequencing. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 10:100202 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. N’Guessan A, Tsitouras A, Sanchez-Quete F, Goitom E, Reiling SJ et al. Detection of prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variant lineages in wastewater and clinical sequences from cities in Québec, Canada. medrXiv 2022 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ellmen I, Lynch MDJ, Nash D, Cheng J, Nissimov JI et al. Alcov: estimating variant of concern abundance from SARS-CoV-2 wastewater sequencing data. Health Informatics 2021 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen C, Nadeau S, Yared M, Voinov P, Xie N et al. CoV-Spectrum: analysis of globally shared SARS-CoV-2 data to identify and characterize new variants. Bioinformatics 2022; 38:1735–1737 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Poon A, Becker, Devin, Gugan, Gopi, Brintnell E. Gromstole Github Repository; 2023 https://github.com/PoonLab/gromstole accessed 31 July 2023
  34. Valieris R, Drummond RD, Defelicibus A, Dias-Neto E, Rosales RA et al. A mixture model for determining SARS-Cov-2 variant composition in pooled samples. Bioinformatics 2022; 38:1809–1815 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Pechlivanis N, Tsagiopoulou M, Maniou MC, Togkousidis A, Mouchtaropoulou E et al. Detecting SARS-CoV-2 lineages and mutational load in municipal wastewater and a use-case in the metropolitan area of Thessaloniki, Greece. Sci Rep 2022; 12:2659 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Pipes L, Chen Z, Afanaseva S, Nielsen R. Estimating the relative proportions of SARS-CoV-2 haplotypes from wastewater samples. Cell Rep Methods 2022; 2:100313 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Baaijens JA, Zulli A, Ott IM, Nika I, van der Lugt MJ et al. Lineage abundance estimation for SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using transcriptome quantification techniques. Genome Biol 2022; 23:236 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol 2016; 34:525–527 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Posada-Céspedes S, Seifert D, Topolsky I, Jablonski KP, Metzner KJ et al. V-pipe: a computational pipeline for assessing viral genetic diversity from high-throughput data. Bioinformatics 2021; 37:1673–1680 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Jahn K, Dreifuss D, Topolsky I, Kull A, Ganesanandamoorthy P et al. Early detection and surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 genomic variants in wastewater using COJAC. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:1151–1160 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Dreifuss D, Topolsky I, Icer Baykal P, Beerenwinkel N. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 genomic variants in wastewater sequencing data with LolliPop. Epidemiology 2022 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Zagordi O, Bhattacharya A, Eriksson N, Beerenwinkel N. ShoRAH: estimating the genetic diversity of a mixed sample from next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:119 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. O’Reilly KM, Allen DJ, Fine P, Asghar H. The challenges of informative wastewater sampling for SARS-CoV-2 must be met: lessons from polio eradication. Lancet Microbe 2020; 1:e189–e190 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Shaw AG, Majumdar M, Troman C, O’Toole Á, Benny B et al. Rapid and sensitive direct detection and identification of poliovirus from stool and environmental surveillance samples by use of nanopore sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58:00920–20 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Ahmed W, Angel N, Edson J, Bibby K, Bivins A et al. First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: a proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community. Sci Total Environ 2020; 728:138764 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu T, Chen Z, Chen W, Chen X, Hosseini M et al. A benchmarking study of SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing protocols using COVID-19 patient samples. iScience 2021; 24:102892 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Quick J. nCoV-2019 sequencing protocol v3 (LoCost) v3; 2020 https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l6n26rgqe/v3
  48. Public Health Agency of Canada Wastewater sequencing trend report: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern by metagenomic sequencing; 2023 https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/emergency-preparedness-response/wastewater-monitoring.html accessed 3 December 2023
  49. Gregory DA, Trujillo M, Rushford C, Flury A, Kannoly S et al. Genetic diversity and evolutionary convergence of cryptic SARS- CoV-2 lineages detected via wastewater sequencing. PLoS Pathog 2022; 18:e1010636 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hart OE, Halden RU. Computational analysis of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 surveillance by wastewater-based epidemiology locally and globally: feasibility, economy, opportunities and challenges. Sci Total Environ 2020; 730:138875 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Dharmadhikari T, Rajput V, Yadav R, Boargaonkar R, Patil D et al. High throughput sequencing based direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 fragments in wastewater of Pune, West India. Sci Total Environ 2022; 807:151038 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Libuit K, Lunn S, Carleton H, Khan W, Kanwar S et al. Quality control solutions for SARS-CoV-2 genomic analysis; 2022 https://pha4ge.org/resource/qc-solutions-for-sars-cov-2-genomic-analysis/ accessed 3 December 2023
  53. Boehm AB, Hughes B, Duong D, Chan-Herur V, Buchman A et al. Wastewater surveillance of human influenza, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinovirus, and seasonal coronaviruses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Infect Dis 2023 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Tisza M, Javornik Cregeen S, Avadhanula V, Zhang P, Ayvaz T et al. Wastewater sequencing reveals community and variant dynamics of the collective human virome. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6878 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Li J, Hosegood I, Powell D, Tscharke B, Lawler J et al. A global aircraft-based wastewater genomic surveillance network for early warning of future pandemics. Lancet Glob Health 2023; 11:e791–e795 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Medina CY, Kadonsky KF, Roman FA, Tariqi AQ, Sinclair RG et al. The need of an environmental justice approach for wastewater based epidemiology for rural and disadvantaged communities: a review in California. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2022; 27:100348 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Tamáš M, Potocarova A, Konecna B, Klucar Ľ, Mackulak T. Wastewater sequencing-an innovative method for variant monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in populations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:9749 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Li Y, Miyani B, Childs KL, Shiu S-H, Xagoraraki I. Effect of wastewater collection and concentration methods on assessment of viral diversity. Sc.Total Environ 2024; 908:168128 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Barbé L, Schaeffer J, Besnard A, Jousse S, Wurtzer S et al. SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing using Oxford nanopore technology for variant monitoring in wastewaters. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:889811 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Dostálková A, Zdeňková K, Bartáčková J, Čermáková E, Kapisheva M et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 variants in Prague wastewater determined by nanopore-based sequencing. Chemosphere 2024; 351:141162 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Schumann V-F, de Castro Cuadrat RR, Wyler E, Wurmus R, Deter A et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics revealed by wastewater sequencing analysis and deconvolution. Sci Total Environ 2022; 853:158931 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Khare S, Gurry C, Freitas L, Schultz MB, Bach G et al. GISAID’s role in pandemic response. China CDC Wkly 2021; 3:1049–1051 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Jackson B, Boni MF, Bull MJ, Colleran A, Colquhoun RM et al. Generation and transmission of interlineage recombinants in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Cell 2021; 184:5179–5188 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Smith K, Ye C, Turakhia Y. Tracking and curating putative SARS-CoV-2 recombinants with RIVET. Bioinformatics 2023; 39:btad538 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rambaut A, Holmes EC, O’Toole Á, Hill V, McCrone JT et al. A dynamic nomenclature proposal for SARS-CoV-2 lineages to assist genomic epidemiology. Nat Microbiol 2020; 5:1403–1407 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lacek KA, Rambo-Martin BL, Batra D, Zheng X-Y, Hassell N et al. SARS-CoV-2 Delta-Omicron Recombinant Viruses, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:1442–1445 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Shen W, Le S, Li Y, Hu F. SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 2016; 11:e0163962 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Gourlé H, Karlsson-Lindsjö O, Hayer J, Bongcam-Rudloff E. Simulating Illumina metagenomic data with InSilicoSeq. Bioinformatics 2019; 35:521–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001249
Loading
Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in wastewater: an assessment of nine computational tools using simulated genomic data
M Gen 10, 001249 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001249
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001249
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001249
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error