Skip to content
1887

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is a severe haemorrhagic disease caused by the African swine fever virus (ASFV), transmitted by ticks, resulting in high mortality among domestic pigs and wild boars. The global spread of ASFV poses significant economic threats to the swine industry. This study employs diverse analytical methods to explore ASFV’s evolution and host adaptation, focusing on codon usage patterns and associated factors. Utilizing phylogenetic analysis methods including neighbour-joining and maximum-likelihood, 64 ASFV strains were categorized into four clades. Codon usage bias (CUB) is modest in ASFV coding sequences. This research identifies multiple factors – such as nucleotide composition, mutational pressures, natural selection and geographical diversity – contributing to the formation of CUB in ASFV. Analysis of relative synonymous codon usage reveals CUB variations within clades and among ASFVs and their hosts. Both Codon Adaptation Index and Similarity Index analyses confirm that ASFV strains are highly adapted to soft ticks () but less so to domestic pigs, which could be a result of the long-term co-evolution of ASFV with ticks. This study sheds light on the factors influencing ASFV’s codon usage and fitness dynamics, enriching our understanding of its evolution, adaptation and host interactions.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The work was partly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Award 2021YFD1800105)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JianzhongZhu
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001186
2024-01-25
2025-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/10/1/mgen001186.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001186&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Chapman DAG, Tcherepanov V, Upton C, Dixon LK. Comparison of the genome sequences of non-pathogenic and pathogenic African swine fever virus isolates. J Gen Virol 2008; 89:397–408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. De Villiers EP, Gallardo C, Arias M, da Silva M, Upton C et al. Phylogenomic analysis of 11 complete African swine fever virus genome sequences. Virology 2010; 400:128–136 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Qu H, Ge S, Zhang Y, Wu X, Wang Z. A systematic review of genotypes and serogroups of African swine fever virus. Virus Genes 2022; 58:77–87 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mur L, Atzeni M, Martínez-López B, Feliziani F, Rolesu S et al. Thirty-five-year presence of African swine fever in Sardinia: History, evolution and risk factors for disease maintenance. Transbound Emerg Dis 2016; 63:e165–77 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dixon LK, Islam M, Nash R, Reis AL. African swine fever virus evasion of host defences. Virus Res 2019; 266:25–33 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Costard S, Mur L, Lubroth J, Sanchez-Vizcaino JM, Pfeiffer DU. Epidemiology of African swine fever virus. Virus Res 2013; 173:191–197 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Góchez D, Raicek M, Pinto Ferreira J, Jeannin M, Moulin G et al. OIE annual report on antimicrobial agents intended for use in Animals: methods used. Front Vet Sci 2019; 6:317 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Parvathy ST, Udayasuriyan V, Bhadana V. Codon usage bias. Mol Biol Rep 2022; 49:539–565 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LaBella AL, Opulente DA, Steenwyk JL, Hittinger CT, Rokas A. Variation and selection on codon usage bias across an entire subphylum. PLoS Genet 2019; 15:e1008304 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dhindsa RS, Copeland BR, Mustoe AM, Goldstein DB. Natural selection shapes codon usage in the Human Genome. Am J Hum Genet 2020; 107:83–95 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shah P, Gilchrist MA. Explaining complex codon usage patterns with selection for translational efficiency, mutation bias, and genetic drift. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:10231–10236 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cannarozzi G, Schraudolph NN, Faty M, von Rohr P, Friberg MT et al. A role for codon order in translation dynamics. Cell 2010; 141:355–367 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Stoletzki N, Eyre-Walker A. Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. Mol Biol Evol 2007; 24:374–381 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gingold H, Pilpel Y. Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy. Mol Syst Biol 2011; 7:481 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu Y. A code within the genetic code: codon usage regulates co-translational protein folding. Cell Commun Signal 2020; 18:145 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanson G, Coller J. Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018; 19:20–30 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kustin T, Stern A. Biased mutation and selection in RNA viruses. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:575–588 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dilucca M, Pavlopoulou A, Georgakilas AG, Giansanti A. Codon usage bias in radioresistant bacteria. Gene 2020; 742:144554 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen F, Wu P, Deng S, Zhang H, Hou Y et al. Dissimilation of synonymous codon usage bias in virus-host coevolution due to translational selection. Nat Ecol Evol 2020; 4:589–600 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Shackelton LA, Parrish CR, Holmes EC. Evolutionary basis of codon usage and nucleotide composition bias in vertebrate DNA viruses. J Mol Evol 2006; 62:551–563 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982; 157:105–132 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kunec D, Osterrieder N. Codon pair bias is a direct consequence of dinucleotide bias. Cell Rep 2016; 14:55–67 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Comeron JM, Aguadé M. An evaluation of measures of synonymous codon usage bias. J Mol Evol 1998; 47:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wright F. The “effective number of codons” used in a gene. Gene 1990; 87:23–29 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sueoka N. Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988; 85:2653–2657 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sueoka N. Two aspects of DNA base composition: G+C content and translation-coupled deviation from intra-strand rule of A = T and G = C. J Mol Evol 1999; 49:49–62 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sueoka N. Translation-coupled violation of Parity Rule 2 in human genes is not the cause of heterogeneity of the DNA G+C content of third codon position. Gene 1999; 238:53–58 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sueoka N. Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol 1995; 40:318–325 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nakamura Y, Gojobori T, Ikemura T. Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:292 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sharp PM, Li WH. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol 1986; 24:28–38 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sharp PM, Li WH. The codon adaptation index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 1987; 15:1281–1295 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Bourret J, Alizon S, Bravo IG. COUSIN (COdon Usage Similarity INdex): a normalized measure of codon usage preferences. Genome Biol Evol 2019; 11:3523–3528 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhou J, Zhang J, Sun D, Ma Q, Chen H et al. The distribution of synonymous codon choice in the translation initiation region of dengue virus. PLoS One 2013; 8:e77239 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gutman GA, Hatfield GW. Nonrandom utilization of codon pairs in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:3699–3703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Jorge D de M, Mills RE, Lauring AS. CodonShuffle: a tool for generating and analyzing synonymously mutated sequences. Virus Evol 2015; 1:vev012 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Quembo CJ, Jori F, Vosloo W, Heath L. Genetic characterization of African swine fever virus isolates from soft ticks at the wildlife/domestic interface in Mozambique and identification of a novel genotype. Transbound Emerg Dis 2018; 65:420–431 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Forth JH, Forth LF, Blome S, Höper D, Beer M. African swine fever whole-genome sequencing-Quantity wanted but quality needed. PLoS Pathog 2020; 16:e1008779 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Karlin S, Burge C. Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature. Trends Genet 1995; 11:283–290 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Beutler E, Gelbart T, Han JH, Koziol JA, Beutler B. Evolution of the genome and the genetic code: selection at the dinucleotide level by methylation and polyribonucleotide cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:192–196 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Breslauer KJ, Frank R, Blöcker H, Marky LA. Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986; 83:3746–3750 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Jimenez-Baranda S, Greenbaum B, Manches O, Handler J, Rabadán R et al. Oligonucleotide motifs that disappear during the evolution of influenza virus in humans increase alpha interferon secretion by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Virol 2011; 85:3893–3904 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Feng H, Segalés J, Wang F, Jin Q, Wang A et al. Comprehensive analysis of codon usage patterns in Chinese porcine circoviruses based on their major protein-coding sequences. Viruses 2022; 14:81 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Xie C, Tao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang P, Zhu X et al. Codon usage for genetic diversity, and evolutionary dynamics of novel Porcine Parvoviruses 2 through 7 (PPV2-PPV7). Viruses 2022; 14:170 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Patil SS, Indrabalan UB, Suresh KP, Shome BR. Analysis of codon usage bias of classical swine fever virus. Vet World 2021; 14:1450–1458 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Jenkins GM, Holmes EC. The extent of codon usage bias in human RNA viruses and its evolutionary origin. Virus Res 2003; 92:1–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Khandia R, Singhal S, Kumar U, Ansari A, Tiwari R et al. Analysis of nipah virus codon usage and adaptation to hosts. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:886 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Greenbaum BD, Levine AJ, Bhanot G, Rabadan R. Patterns of evolution and host gene mimicry in influenza and other RNA viruses. PLoS Pathog 2008; 4:e1000079 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lobo FP, Mota BEF, Pena SDJ, Azevedo V, Macedo AM et al. Virus-host coevolution: common patterns of nucleotide motif usage in Flaviviridae and their hosts. PLoS One 2009; 4:e6282 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Coleman JR, Papamichail D, Skiena S, Futcher B, Wimmer E et al. Virus attenuation by genome-scale changes in codon pair bias. Science 2008; 320:1784–1787 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vicario S, Moriyama EN, Powell JR. Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila. BMC Evol Biol 2007; 7:226 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Nasrullah I, Butt AM, Tahir S, Idrees M, Tong Y. Genomic analysis of codon usage shows influence of mutation pressure, natural selection, and host features on Marburg virus evolution. BMC Evol Biol 2015; 15:174 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pu F, Wang R, Yang X, Hu X, Wang J et al. Nucleotide and codon usage biases involved in the evolution of African swine fever virus: a comparative genomics analysis. J Basic Microbiol 2023; 63:499–518 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Dorn A, Kippenberger S. Clinical application of CpG-, non-CpG-, and antisense oligodeoxynucleotides as immunomodulators. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2008; 10:10–20 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Gómez MM, Tort LFL, Volotao E de M, Recarey R, Moratorio G et al. Analysis of human P[4]G2 rotavirus strains isolated in Brazil reveals codon usage bias and strong compositional constraints. Infect Genet Evol 2011; 11:580–586 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Roy A, Guo F, Singh B, Gupta S, Paul K et al. Base composition and host adaptation of the SARS-CoV-2: insight from the codon usage perspective. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:548275 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Jimenez-Baranda S, Greenbaum B, Manches O, Handler J, Rabadán R et al. Oligonucleotide motifs that disappear during the evolution of influenza virus in humans increase alpha interferon secretion by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Virol 2011; 85:3893–3904 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Hu J, Wang Q, Zhang J, Chen H, Xu Z et al. The characteristic of codon usage pattern and its evolution of hepatitis C virus. Infect Genet Evol 2011; 11:2098–2102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Kleiboeker SB, Burrage TG, Scoles GA, Fish D, Rock DL. African swine fever virus infection in the argasid host, Ornithodoros porcinus porcinus. J Virol 1998; 72:1711–1724 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Nuttall PA. Molecular characterization of tick-virus interactions. Front Biosci 2009; 14:2466–2483 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang P, Yang K, Dai X, Pang Y, Su D. Infection of wild-type Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus induces in vivo apoptosis of Spodoptera litura larvae. J Gen Virol 2002; 83:3003–3011 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Vaidyanathan R, Scott TW. Apoptosis in mosquito midgut epithelia associated with West Nile virus infection. Apoptosis 2006; 11:1643–1651 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Roth A, Anisimova M, Cannarozzi GM. 189Measuring codon usage bias. In Cannarozzi GM, Schneider A. eds Codon Evolution: Mechanisms and Models Oxford University Press; 2012 p 0 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Khattak S, Rauf MA, Zaman Q, Ali Y, Fatima S et al. Genome-wide analysis of codon usage patterns of SARS-CoV-2 virus reveals global heterogeneity of COVID-19. Biomolecules 2021; 11:912 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Franzo G, Tucciarone CM, Cecchinato M, Drigo M. Canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2) and Feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) codon bias analysis reveals a progressive adaptation to the new niche after the host jump. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2017; 114:82–92 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Guo F, Roy A, Wang R, Yang J, Zhang Z et al. Host adaptive evolution of avian-origin H3N2 canine influenza Virus. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:655228 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001186
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001186
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error